...
What I wonder is whether just looking at some "hot guy's" body (not fully nude, penis covered) is already enough to get the juices flowing?
I am particularly talking just about viewing, without any thought of what that guy might do to you (and without viewing his cock, only a 'hot' body).
Give me a picture of nice tits (dressed or nude) and I'm hard as brick.
Does the same work for women? Show her a picture of a nice male upper body and it's all soaked?
Nope, not for me.
I need to be able to feel a connection to the visual, an emotion at least.
It's perfectly possible for a good picture to "get the juices flowing", but it has to be an artistic picture that captures something. (Like the ones petite (and others) have been posting, thanks for that!
)
It's perfectly possible that staring at a guy with a great torso gets me going, but that will be because of his attitude, what he projects. How he walks, what kind of signals I perceive,... things like that.
When porn is just a dick being shoved in a pussy, doesn't do anything to me. When the director shoots the actors staring into each other eyes, captures a trembling hand or a spasm or you can see the two people in the picture really connecting, THEN I get turned on.
But purely a visual that doesn't project anything more... nope. Nothing.
Of course, there's a big grey zone between an empty, superficial image and an artistic, emotional one.