VOLUME--measurement gold standard

[Mr._dB]

[quote author=thefrench_h link=board=meetgreet;num=1076526588;start=0#7 date=02/12/04 at 08:27:47]31,72 for me.

BTW, I don't believe that Napier and Mandingo are so big. I would estimate them at 10-11" long and 7-7,5" around at max. That would mean a max volume close to 50 cubic inches...
And I know girls that will be surprised to know that there's guys with cocks 64% bigger than mine ;-) Girth is everything ![/quote]

The porn guys always lie about their stats. Every time I see a film clip of one of these guys who are supposed to be 12-15", my first reaction is "...that doesn't look any bigger than mine."

Now, I haven't seen that much porn, I'm not an aficianado of the genre, surely there really ARE some monsters in the field, but most of 'em exaggerate.

Someone once sent me a link to a site for some dude named "King Chile" who supposedly had a 12" unit. I looked at the film clips, and saw what I estimate is an 8.5" L x 7.5" C unit. When I wrote back to my friend that "hell, I'm longer than that..." she called me a liar. I see that King Chile has since revised his stats to 10", but when you see a girl giving him a hand job you can tell it's less than that, unless she's got man hands.

 

[13788]

Krowax: 19,00 cubic inches or 311,5 cm^3.

 

[13788]

an8x7: i just found the lpsg hall of fame and noticed some rather large members! i guess rangersean is not the winner after all.

blackbanana0166 takes the trophy with 249.5 cubic inches!!! : that's 3 times bigger than poor rangersean ???

a distant second is alex17inch with only 187.4 cubic inches.

could someone help me develop a formula to calculate how much blood would be needed to get these two sequoias erect? ;D

 

[B_DoubleMeatWhopper]

I have to wonder how volume is a useful stat. If I quote my size as 9.25" x 6.75", that gives a pretty good idea what kind of size I'm talking about. If I give my volume as a little over 33.5 cubic inches, that's not so informative. Average length but very fat? Slender, but extremely long? Above average in both length and girth? All those combinations are possible for 33.5, so how is using volume practical? I doubt anyone thinks, "I wonder how much liquid that dude's dick displaces?"

 

[13788]

an8x7: hi doublemeatwhopper,

you're right about nothing will replace length as the best description of a cock along with an adjective like thick as most people probably don't think in terms of circumference.

i just found that volume was an interesting way to deal with both length and girth. i find that it is unusual to have both long length and huge girth together. most dicks seem to be one or the other. the definitive penis study guy had all these statistics about each separate but had never done a correlation. i suggested he graph them both together and the result was enlightening. my length was only in the top 10% and my circumference was in the top 5% but the combination was in the top 1%!

any way you describe it yours is impressive!!!!

 

[jonb]

[quote author=DoubleMeatWhopper link=board=meetgreet;num=1076526588;start=20#23 date=02/15/04 at 12:58:12]I have to wonder how volume is a useful stat. If I quote my size as 9.25" x 6.75", that gives a pretty good idea what kind of size I'm talking about. If I give my volume as a little over 33.5 cubic inches, that's not so informative. Average length but very fat? Slender, but extremely long? Above average in both length and girth? All those combinations are possible for 33.5, so how is using volume practical? I doubt anyone thinks, "I wonder how much liquid that dude's dick displaces?" [/quote]
LOL Hell, I'd prefer surface area. Makes more sense, given what we use the penis for.

 

[13788]

thefrench_h: [quote author=DoubleMeatWhopper link=board=meetgreet;num=1076526588;start=20#23 date=02/15/04 at 12:58:12]I have to wonder how volume is a useful stat. If I quote my size as 9.25" x 6.75", that gives a pretty good idea what kind of size I'm talking about. If I give my volume as a little over 33.5 cubic inches, that's not so informative. Average length but very fat? Slender, but extremely long? Above average in both length and girth? All those combinations are possible for 33.5, so how is using volume practical? I doubt anyone thinks, "I wonder how much liquid that dude's dick displaces?" [/quote]

Volume doesn't mean much alone but, from my point of view, it is quite a good indicator for comparison.
If the average is close to 12 cubic inches, let's say that any guy with a volume over 24 got a big one, and that monsters began at 36 for example ;-)

 

[13788]

m17in3: I'd like to add that volume can also be divided by other dimensions, like body size or weight.
This ratio would be higher for a small guy with a big package than for a tall guy with the same cock.

For me : volume = 17 in^3, size = 73" ==> Ratio = 0.23
for DMW : vol = 36, size = 66 ==> ratio = 0.55
gigantikok : vol = 41, size = 77 ==> ratio = 0.53

it would express the contrast (or the visual effect) given by the cock compare to the body/frame, a kind of "Is it all yours" factor ;-)

 

[13788]

an8x7: very interesting m17in3!

it is sorta like the comparison between me and my long thin dick friend.  because mine is fatter it looks shorter and vice versa his looks even longer because it is thinner.

the same is true of tall slim men versus short heavier men.  so in addition to a height factor maybe we should add a weight factor--of the total person--not to be confused with our ongoing quest to develop a weight formula for our cocks.

 

[13788]

m17in3: I reused the data of over13inches hall of fame, and here are the figures for the ratio volume/height :

blackbanana0166 3,3
alex17inch 2,9
toowellhung 1,9
johnholmeshorse 1,5
doctor_ay 1,4
bigbebop 1,3
xlhorsemeat 1,0
14x8thck 1,0

A pornstar like Mandingo would only be close to 0,66

Congratulations guys !

 

[jonb]

Don't you mean volume compared to weight? If you double the height of something and the proportions remain the same, its volume increases by a factor of 2^3 or 8.

 

[13788]

punk9: Didn't Archimedes measure the displaced water?

You can fill any vessel to the top and simply collect the displaced water in another vessel. After sinking your member into the water, just measure the overflow in a graduated cylinder and you have your volume.

 

[jonb]

Well, Archimedes was working with gold and silver, two materials which sink. Your penis doesn't sink, and quite frankly it doesn't

I'd still say surface area would be better. Here's a rough idea of surface area:

headLength ^ 2 * 2 * pi + shaftLength * girth

Of course, this assumes your head is a perfect hemisphere. So, using mine . . . My head's about an inch and a half long, my shaft is about 9 inches long. My girth is 7 inches.

1.5 ^ 2 * 2 *pi + 9.0 * 7.0
2.25 * 2 * pi + 9.0 * 7.0
4.5 * pi + 9.0 * 7.0
14.13 + 9.0 * 7.0
14.13 + 63
77 square inches, or 500 cm[sup]2[/sup]

 

[13788]

HORSEHUNGshowoff: Hmmmmmmmm Interesting proposition, with this mathematical formula i have 43"

 

[13788]

HORSEHUNGshowoff: Posted by: an8x7
could someone help me develop a formula to calculate how much blood would be needed to get these two sequoias erect?

IMAGINATION ??????????? Surely yu dont believe these stupid fukin dreamers claims, how naive can someone be ? Of course they have NO PICS no CAMS or worse those ridiculous enhanced pics lol
I woudl love to know what size these FREAKS are when they hear their alarm clock , I bet not even bigger than my soft size

GET REAL guys stop being so fukin dense

HORSE

 

[jonb]

That's square inches, not inches. Someone didn't take geometry. I know it biases for length, but so what?

 

[13788]

rangersean: I'm very glad not to be the 'winner' (whatever that means, since I never claimed longest or thickest or largest, etc.). But I'm not playing any more with math today.