Voter Machine tampering:Ohio

SilverTrain

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Posts
4,623
Media
82
Likes
1,312
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Well fuck.

A couple of ACORN workers leaned too far into a rich county and enough outrage was "generated" to fuel 45 missions to Pluto. But shit like this helped secure a gazilion votes in 2004 and looks to be good for a gazillion more in 2012.

And it'll be the biggest non-story of 2012.

Again, FUCK.
 

AtomicMouse1950

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 30, 2011
Posts
2,968
Media
22
Likes
460
Points
218
Age
73
Location
Placerville , Ca.
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Well fuck.

A couple of ACORN workers leaned too far into a rich county and enough outrage was "generated" to fuel 45 missions to Pluto. But shit like this helped secure a gazilion votes in 2004 and looks to be good for a gazillion more in 2012.

And it'll be the biggest non-story of 2012.

Again, FUCK.

Accorn doesn't exist! It hasn't existed for 6 years!
 

Bardox

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Posts
2,234
Media
38
Likes
551
Points
198
Location
U.S.
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Important note. Accorn wasn't "caught" they reported the discrepancies themselves.
 

njitalian02

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2012
Posts
266
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
103
Location
NJ
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
As far as Ohio article , I understand the outrage that will follow, but it seems to me that the change is simply who is holding the pen. Before the election official fills it out, but now the voter is in charge of the pen. No requirements are changed. No more ID is required. Just the person writing is different. Am I reading that right?
 

AtomicMouse1950

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 30, 2011
Posts
2,968
Media
22
Likes
460
Points
218
Age
73
Location
Placerville , Ca.
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
But that, places the burden is on the voter, not anyone else. That's not the way it's supposed to be. It's the job of the polling places, not to cast judgement upon the voter. They're to collect the votes, and make sure they're to be counted.
 

njitalian02

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2012
Posts
266
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
103
Location
NJ
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I don't mean to be rude and maybe I just don't understand what you're trying to say, but when you say "cast judgment" what do you mean? Do you just mean, "cast judgment" as in the poll workers shouldn't decide whether or not the person filled out the form correctly? Hypothetically, assume the law said the voter fills out the form, who is to decide whether the form is filled out correctly and counted?

"They're to collect eh votes, and make sure they're to be counted"--> So, who is to assess whether a vote should not be counted (ex. bad information, incorrect information, fraud, etc.). I'm not saying it's likely to occur, but shouldn't someone check the information and assess whether the ballot meets the requirements of the law?

I agree the law says the election official shall record the information, but again, is this "issue" really boiling down to one person filling out a form versus another? Throwing the word "burden" makes it sound so much more devious than I read it to be. Again, the "burden" is filling out information. Just symantically, is it a "burden" that I fill out forms at DMV and bring the ID with me? It's not a "burden," it's just a system and I don't see how this is devious unless so many people cannot fill out their own information properly (i.e, maybe not so smart people) and b/c they can't fill out their social for example, their vote might not count.

Isn't it more insane to say that people can't fill out forms properly (with personal information) and that could sway a national election?
 

StormfrontFL

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Posts
8,903
Media
4
Likes
6,850
Points
358
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male

StormfrontFL

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Posts
8,903
Media
4
Likes
6,850
Points
358
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Where was yours in 2008 ?
You've been on the site since 2007 and came nowhere near this forum until HM began getting his ass handed to him, so where were you in 2008?* What about all the dirty GOP tricks in 2000 and 2004?
* One of your earliest posts was in the CE forum and it was highly racist so anything you have to say is pointless and without merit as far as I'm concerned

ACORN? Not even in the same league as the GOP when it comes to fraud

OnPolitics (washingtonpost.com)
Perhaps the most dramatic undercount in this election was the nonexistent ballots of the countless unknown eligible voters, who were wrongfully purged from the voter registration rolls, turned away from the polls, and by various other means prevented from exercising the franchise. While statistical data, reinforced by credible anecdotal evidence, point to widespread disenfranchisement and denial of voting rights, it is impossible to determine the extent of the disenfranchisement or to provide an adequate remedy to the persons whose voices were silenced in this historic election by a pattern and practice of injustice, ineptitude and inefficiency.
During the November 2000 presidential election in Florida, restrictive statutory provisions, wide-ranging errors and inadequate and unequal resources in the election process denied countless Floridians the right to vote. The disenfranchisement of Florida's voters fell most harshly on the shoulders of African Americans. Statewide, based upon county-level statistical estimates, African American voters were nearly ten times more likely than white voters to have their ballots rejected in Florida. On a statewide basis, while African Americans comprised about 11% of all voters in Florida in the November 2000 presidential election, African Americans cast about 54% of the ballots that were rejected in the election. Before and during the election state and county officials were aware of several key factors that ultimately contributed to the disenfranchisement of qualified voters.
2000 Elections: Voter registration issues
GOP registration worker charged with voter fraud - NBC Politics
GOP registration worker charged with voter fraud - NBC Politics
Voter Fraud: It's Time to Apply the ACORN Rule and Defund GOP | NJ.com
 
Last edited:

lurker37160

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Posts
526
Media
0
Likes
27
Points
248
Location
Murfreesboro (Tennessee, United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
So much misinformation....but keep saying it and some of the Sheeple will believe you. Thinking people will not.

You've been on the site since 2007 and came nowhere near this forum until HM began getting his ass handed to him, so where were you in 2008?* What about all the dirty GOP tricks in 2000 and 2004?
* One of your earliest posts was in the CE forum and it was highly racist so anything you have to say is pointless and without merit as far as I'm concerned

ACORN? Not even in the same league as the GOP when it comes to fraud

OnPolitics (washingtonpost.com)
Perhaps the most dramatic undercount in this election was the nonexistent ballots of the countless unknown eligible voters, who were wrongfully purged from the voter registration rolls, turned away from the polls, and by various other means prevented from exercising the franchise. While statistical data, reinforced by credible anecdotal evidence, point to widespread disenfranchisement and denial of voting rights, it is impossible to determine the extent of the disenfranchisement or to provide an adequate remedy to the persons whose voices were silenced in this historic election by a pattern and practice of injustice, ineptitude and inefficiency.
During the November 2000 presidential election in Florida, restrictive statutory provisions, wide-ranging errors and inadequate and unequal resources in the election process denied countless Floridians the right to vote. The disenfranchisement of Florida's voters fell most harshly on the shoulders of African Americans. Statewide, based upon county-level statistical estimates, African American voters were nearly ten times more likely than white voters to have their ballots rejected in Florida. On a statewide basis, while African Americans comprised about 11% of all voters in Florida in the November 2000 presidential election, African Americans cast about 54% of the ballots that were rejected in the election. Before and during the election state and county officials were aware of several key factors that ultimately contributed to the disenfranchisement of qualified voters.
2000 Elections: Voter registration issues
GOP registration worker charged with voter fraud - NBC Politics
GOP registration worker charged with voter fraud - NBC Politics
Voter Fraud: It's Time to Apply the ACORN Rule and Defund GOP | NJ.com
 

StormfrontFL

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Posts
8,903
Media
4
Likes
6,850
Points
358
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
So much misinformation....but keep saying it and some of the Sheeple will believe you. Thinking people will not.
Racist says what?:rolleyes:
http://www.lpsg.com/1793522-post184.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by texas41-38

Additionally, Mrs. Obama doesn't strike me as the type of woman that is going to hook up with a little dicked man or one that can't get down and eat some mean gash.

lurker37160
She looks EXACTLY like an organ grinder's monkey.



Take off the hood and try to sound out the big words in the article. :duh:



 
Last edited: