rbkwp
Mythical Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Posts
- 80,321
- Media
- 1
- Likes
- 45,713
- Points
- 608
- Location
- Auckland (New Zealand)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
Speaking of...Fox News is having an orgasm over the shoot-out in France. The full military might of France were pitted against two stereotypical made-for-propaganda muslim brothers Said and Cherif Kouachi and a good-buddy of theirs that went into a Jewish deli for a pastrami sandwich and hostages. Naturally he ended up really most sincerely dead as well. But because it was a Kosher market, the media is going bonkers over the anti-semitic angle of this terrorist story. So much for the Kouachi brothers being a highly-trained and armed terrorist army.
How the hell did two guys in a Citroen call for a response of 90,000 French police and paramilitary soldiers? To put those numbers in perspective, this is about 62% of the total that stormed the beaches of Normandy in 1944. And they still haven't captured the Kosher supermarket terrorist's girlfriend, Nayat Boumediene.
I'm trying to grasp parallels in American history. Way back in 1974 there was a group that called themselves the Symbionese Liberation Army. It was headed by an African-American fellow from Cleveland named Donald DeFreeze or Donald DeepFreeze. It wasn't so much an army as a rag-tag platoon of a half-dozen nut-cases including a kidnapped heiress turned member named Patty Hurst. Their motto was good sex and bad drugs were the hallmarks of a great civilization as they whomped and stomped their way from small-time California robbery to robbery.
Eventually the SLA was caught in a run-down house in beautiful south-central L.A. with half the available police from San Diego to Eureka surrounding it. Like their Parisian counterparts, the "Symbionese Zees" and their collection of pea shooters were no match for California's finest, some of whom may have also stormed the beaches of Normandy. In the blink of an eye the house was obliterated, Donald DeepFreeze was sent in a body bag back to Cleveland and Patty Hurst was sent packing back to daddy after getting de-programmed from the Stockholm Syndrome. The world was safe again for democracy and apple pie.
news
WTF is frencfhmen ALLENDE raving on about 'desyroying AIS'
let the attacks happen, trying the sympathy game, getting all on his side because a minimal amount were killed
countries only at risk because of there bungling
LONDON never had as much of a problem, not impressed!!!
getting more suspect and sick of the possible deceit and crap that could be comming from this
if its legitimate, wont to late for me to swallow my pride
rather say somethingf now than be taken in with possible hysteria/hype
SICK of all the deciet these days
Care to provide an update?
I understand your point Jjz1109. That previous post I made was an outgrowth from the Charlie Hebdo attack early this year. But please don't take your eye off underlying causal factors of radical Muslim terror. It has little to do with their envy of our western Caucasian freedoms and everything about our invasion to overthrow Middle East and North African governments that won't play ball with the U.S. (and more importantly Israel) on corporate and banking cartel interests, particularly oil and natural resources. The Arab Spring was brought to you courtesy of the C.I.A. and Mossad.
For a more extensive and more articulate analysis of the current situation might I suggest http://www.craigbhulet.com Hulet was a high-level C.I.A. terrorism analyst with an extensive military education and background who has the courage to cut-through the mandatory propaganda line on our current international crises.
Maybe because one BIt looks like since the "west" runs air strikes against ISIS, the bombs hit the right targets...
After the latest French air strikers, the leaders of ISIS and their families leave the Syrian city Rakka and move to Iraq.
Why wasn't it possible to do such strikes more early?
Might be are reason as well, but if so they could have done it even before the Paris attacks.Maybe because one B
IG reason is because earlier, "the west" was the only one doing air strikes. Now that Russia is also bombing, it has really devolved into who is bombing the "right" targets and who is not? Pretty sick if you ask me!
What it all comes down to is, "Who is calling the shots"? These military euphemisms, collateral damage, humanitarian bombing, surgical strikes, signature strikes sound like bureaucratic business type jargon; like calling a bus driver a "transportation engineer", garbage men are sanitation engineers, etc..Might be are reason as well, but if so they could have done it even before the Paris attacks.
the question is, stopped France to care for "political reasons" or do they stopped to care for collateral damages?
For example, in the past France and the USA didn't bombed ISIS oil trucks and sources, simply because they sold their oil to "rebells" the west had as allies.
But oil is one of ISIS's main income sources as well...
If the western ally Al Quaida would have been in Rakka as well, it could have been as reason not to bomb the city.
But if the reason was the fear of collateral damage, i understand why they didn't bombed rhe city in the past and would see it critical that they did it now
big fail, we should be fighting the origin nations of terror, Iran and the Saudis. .
When they murdered some 224 men women and children by bombing a Russian airliner, ISIS was quite boastful about it. Since Russia's entry into the fray, working with France in air attacks, see:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/18/world/europe/russia-plane-crash-bomb.html?_r=0
Now they're saying they got the wrong target:
www.yahoo.com: ISIS says soda can bomb detonated on Russian plane got the wrong target
All of the terrorists in France seem to have been European nationals.