Washington shooting

[Perados]

We can't. There are violent leftists gunning down conservatives in the street. We need to protect ourselves. Maybe instead we could ship all of our liberals to Germany....

oh please no... they would be far to right for us (serious)

 

[BULLDOG00]

so, it's a bad system... stop it by banning all guns

See, that right there is what liberals REALLY mean when they say they want "common sense," gun control.

 

[Chrysippus]

I don't know about you, but I don't have a personal police detail that goes with me everywhere, however I am highly trained and a .45 rides on my right hip.
As for guns being illegal, ask the people in Paris (Muslim shooting) how that worked out them, or the people on London Bridge (Muslim stabbing), or the people at the Boston Marathon (Muslim bombing).

The Alexandria shooter was a white working-class American from Illinois--not Muslim, not immigrant. Dylann Roof was white American, not an immigrant, not Muslim. Anything else you want to blame on Muslims?
Trump's travel ban wouldn't and couldn't have prevented the Roof or Hodgkinson shootings.

 

[BULLDOG00]

The Alexandria shooter was a white working-class American from Illinois--not Muslim, not immigrant. Dylann Roof was white American, not an immigrant, not Muslim. Anything else you want to blame on Muslims?
Trump's travel ban wouldn't and couldn't have prevented the Roof or Hodgkinson shootings.

Who said anything about the travel ban?

The shooter was a Bernie Bro.

 

[Perados]

See, that right there is what liberals REALLY mean when they say they want "common sense," gun control.

You have to agree, 99% don't need a gun and 99.9999% don't need all the guns they own.

I understand that farmers or hunter need a gun. Even if you do some sport shooting, I understand it. But NO ONE needs a gun that could kill an Elephant with one shot, or a gun that can fire 40 shots per minute, or can kill on a distance of half a mile.

Everyone else only owns a gun out of psychological reasons. They FEEL more safe, some even try to compensate something. For others it's a symbol of freedom, or they think they are a rebel...
But none of this is a REAL reason to own a gun...

But the very first step would be a serious gun control. But even this doesn't seem to be possible. THIS could be seen as common sense. If you have legal guns, make sure that only the "right" people own one.

 

[BULLDOG00]

You have to agree, 99% don't need a gun and 99.9999% don't need all the guns they own.

I understand that farmers or hunter need a gun. Even if you do some sport shooting, I understand it. But NO ONE needs a gun that could kill an Elephant with one shot, or a gun that can fire 40 shots per minute, or can kill on a distance of half a mile.

Everyone else only owns a gun out of psychological reasons. They FEEL more safe, some even try to compensate something. For others it's a symbol of freedom, or they think they are a rebel...
But none of this is a REAL reason to own a gun...

But the very first step would be a serious gun control. But even this doesn't seem to be possible.

In America we don't have a bill of needs, we have a Bill of Rights. We prohibit the government from telling the citizens what they need or don't need.

 

[Perados]

In America we don't have a bill of needs, we have a Bill of Rights. We prohibit the government from telling the citizens what they need or don't need.

Every right can be limited
Right of freedom, when you go to jain.
Right of privacy, when intelligence think so.
Right to vote, you have to be old enough.
Even the right to live
.
.
.

Why no limits for the right to own a gun?

 

[Perados]

In America we don't have a bill of needs, we have a Bill of Rights. We prohibit the government from telling the citizens what they need or don't need.

Every right can be limited
Right of freedom, when you go to jain.
Right of privacy, when intelligence think so.
Right to vote, you have to be old enough.
Even the right to live
.
.
.

Why no limits for the right to own a gun?

 

[BULLDOG00]

Every right can be limited
Right of freedom, when you go to jain.
Right of privacy, when intelligence think so.
Right to vote, you have to be old enough.
Even the right to live
.
.
.

Why no limits for the right to own a gun?

What limits are you looking for? Usually when we dig into this we find out the liberal just wants an outright ban.

 

[Klingsor]

What limits are you looking for? Usually when we dig into this we find out the liberal just wants an outright ban.

Usually when we dig into that claim, we find it untrue.

 

[Perados]

What limits are you looking for? Usually when we dig into this we find out the liberal just wants an outright ban.

Sure I would prefer a total ban... but that's not the point.
It's about consensus.
I want a total ban, tou want it as free as possible. Let's meet in the middle.

 

[b.c.]

What limits are you looking for? Usually when we dig into this we find out the liberal just wants an outright ban.

Usually when we dig into that claim, we find it untrue.

More right winged spin and bullshit. There are few liberals looking for an outright ban. On the other hand, MOST conservatives don't even want a BACKGROUND check.

Btw, have you see this?

Republican who voted against background checks wants to know background of Scalise's shooter

 

[Mercurygirl]

Who didn't see this coming.

This is what you get when the Left, its mainstream media propaganda mouthpiece, continues to promote and inspire hate and violence against the President of the United States and his supporters.

Question: Liberals, have you no decency?

Time to honor the Constitution and put an end to your irrational erratic violent behavior.

 

[Chrysippus]

The shooter was a Bernie Bro.

Are you really stupid enough and enough of a jerk to blame Bernie Sanders for this assassination attempt?

 

[deleted15807]

More right winged spin and bullshit. There are few liberals looking for an outright ban. On the other hand, MOST conservatives don't even want a BACKGROUND check.

Btw, have you see this?

Republican who voted against background checks wants to know background of Scalise's shooter

It should be easier to get a gun than vote! Right?!

 

[Tight_N_Juicy]

Who didn't see this coming.

This is what you get when the Left, its mainstream media propaganda mouthpiece, continues to promote and inspire hate and violence against the President of the United States and his supporters.

Question: Liberals, have you no decency?

Time to honor the Constitution and put an end to your irrational erratic violent behavior.

You do realize being on the left kinda means your Anti-Violence... if not, well.. yeah. It's part of the whole 'pussy snowflake' deal.

And I'm sorry, how many far-right conservatives have been super gun-ho about violence when it pushes their agenda. Bill fucking O'reilly... ring a bell? SMFH, still throwing shit.

ETA if you seriously think the MSM is promoting a true 'leftist agenda' you're sadly, sadly mistaken. All those assholes on All the main-stream channels licking Chrumps balls when he dropped the MOAB, disgusting.

 

[chicocklarge]

Are you really stupid enough and enough of a jerk to blame Bernie Sanders for this assassination attempt?

What assassination attempt was this?

 

[phonehome]

Yep all those Republicans Donald Trump included talking about and in a positive certainly not negative way about "2nd amendment remedies"

Not so fucking funny now is it !!!!!!.

 

[Wave85]

Let's just get rid of the whole left and right thing and label people as quality or crappy and not because they are either a liberal or conservative. There are quality conservatives and quality liberals - stand up people who are not bigoted or sexist or self-centered, who care deeply about making things better for everyone, just maybe with different ideas about how to get there. There are crappy people on both sides too who are crappy for any number of reasons. The shooter in Alexandria is an attempted murderer - a crappy person. The President by any objective standard is a crappy person too. If we just stop rallying around people merely because they are labeled as left or right and instead rally around people of quality we will get what we rally around.

 

[b.c.]

You do realize being on the left kinda means your Anti-Violence... if not, well.. yeah. It's part of the whole 'pussy snowflake' deal.

And I'm sorry, how many far-right conservatives have been super gun-ho about violence when it pushes their agenda. Bill fucking O'reilly... ring a bell? SMFH, still throwing shit.

ETA if you seriously think the MSM is promoting a true 'leftist agenda' you're sadly, sadly mistaken. All those assholes on All the main-stream channels licking Chrumps balls when he dropped the MOAB, disgusting.

That kind of b.s. mischaracterization of liberals is typical of MG and those of like mind.

Lest they forget, it is WE liberals who've traditionally decried acts of terrorism, whether against politicians, ordinary people, minorities, gays, immigrants, and the like.

It is WE who advocated for stronger gun laws and background checks while conservatives and the NRA fight it tooth and nail.

It is WE who spoke out against the persecution of and discrimination against people because of their nationality, race, religion, or sexual identity.

It is WE liberals who called out acts like questionable killings on the part of law enforcement, the racist attack in Portland by a supremacist crackpot, and the recent DEATH threats made by conservatives against democratic candidates for office...

all that and MORE - while conservatives sat quietly by and didn't say a FUCKING word in condemnation of ANY of it.

So for one of them to show up NOW and post some bullshit like "liberals have you no decency" would be damn near laughable, if it weren't so patently PATHETIC.