Website editors strive to rein in nasty comments.

Discussion in 'Et Cetera, Et Cetera' started by D_Wally Walnuts, May 27, 2010.

  1. D_Wally Walnuts

    D_Wally Walnuts New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    2
  2. B_Nick4444

    B_Nick4444 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    12
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    the article corroborated what I suspected about some of the more churlish postings one comes across

    and I agree freedom of expression is indeed of value, if there is a valid point being made -- the question, and the caveat is: who is to decide?
     
  3. D_Wally Walnuts

    D_Wally Walnuts New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    2
    The thing is there are some posts on some sites that are only meant to incite anger. I think the mods of those sites could keep those kinds of comments to a minimum.
     
  4. TomCat84

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    3,497
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    32
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    On my hometown nespaper's (San Diego Union-Tribune) site, whenever there's an article about Obama or gays, it's Katie bar the door, and all the crazy kooks come out and play. :eek:
     
  5. Bbucko

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,413
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    58
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sunny SoFla
    I have had to moderate comments on my blog only once, and that was after someone had posted personal information (name and where he went to HS) about another commenter. The only other reasons why I'd delete anything is either because it provided a link to underage porn or were spam.

    Otherwise, everything else stays. If you're gonna talk the talk regarding free speech, you've gotta be prepared to walk the walk.
     
  6. D_Wally Walnuts

    D_Wally Walnuts New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2010
    Messages:
    587
    Likes Received:
    2
    I'm not saying they should be locked up, but I do think it's a good thing to make sure the comments stay on topic.
     
  7. B_talltpaguy

    B_talltpaguy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2007
    Messages:
    2,394
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Obviously the owner, or the owner's designated agents decide.

    On sites I run, we make a point reminding people that 'free speech' only applies to the public domain (like parks, public ROW, govt meetings, etc). A privately owned, members only website is NOT considered to be in the public sphere.

    Think of it like this... if you went over to your neighbor's house and started calling him names, and drew nasty messages on his walls, does he have to listen to your diatribe because you are protected by 'free speech'? Or can he kick you off his property, paint over the messages you left and never speak to you again?... A members only website (such as LPSG) isn't much different.
     
  8. Bbucko

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,413
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    58
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Sunny SoFla
    My blog typically attracts three types of commenter:

    1) Long-time readers and other friends who acknowledge having read something;

    2) New readers who find it via Google;

    3) One of several trolls to stalk me from place to place.

    While obviously preferring the first two, I have never deleted a nasty or inflammatory comment. Except during that brief time mentioned above, I've never moderated the comments. The Spin Cycle is supposed to be provocative; I really can't worry overmuch about whom I provoke negatively or why. It's really their problem, not mine.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted