What are you watching?

Yorkie

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Posts
5,412
Media
79
Likes
4,499
Points
358
Location
England (United Kingdom)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
wow
little envious
a man ahead of his time
They all have rare footage. I thought they would have been licenced to be shown everywhere with the BBC operating worldwide. Unmissable for any Bowie fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rbkwp

rbkwp

Mythical Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Posts
80,591
Media
1
Likes
45,897
Points
608
Location
Auckland (New Zealand)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
They all have rare footage. I thought they would have been licenced to be shown everywhere with the BBC operating worldwide. Unmissable for any Bowie fan.


is
my fav
amongst all his others ha
yes, esp the SAX work

i doubt we will get it
ma bbc too busy trying to get rid of fawlty towers huh

now for dins

 

rbkwp

Mythical Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2007
Posts
80,591
Media
1
Likes
45,897
Points
608
Location
Auckland (New Zealand)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Rob Atkin's .. outside source ... news
BBC
seemingly,every statement gospel

always good,even if rare
that one has a trusted newsperson
known of/followed for 20 plus years
radio only for 5 of those
brilliant

Amy,of democracy now another gem
 

Enid

Worshipped Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Posts
7,326
Media
10
Likes
17,474
Points
393
Age
53
Location
Arlington, Texas, US
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Female
SPOILERS ahead for Showtime show Billions.

*************************





I'm catching up on Billions season 5. On episode 6 right now, The Nordic Model.

First off let me just say Chuck Rhoades is a goddamn asshole. Fuck his patriarchal attitude about "prostitutes" and his willingness to underhandedly use a negative argument regarding sex workers to get what he wants. I know, it's part of the character. And it's something I really like about the show, the supposed good guy isn't that good and the bad guy has his moments of redemption. I guess. He's still pretty bad, though. ANYway...



Now that's out of the way, I see what I think is a major plothole. Chuck *intentionally* spills red wine on the Van Gogh trying to catch Axe in the lie that it's a replica. It's so not a replica. Chuck then organizes some big takedown trying to catch him for tax fraud but by then Axe has made his apartment a museum displaying the original works so he can't be charged. Chuck has art authenticators with him and everything. But since Axe did what he did, Chuck slinks away without his win.

Why the eff can't Chuck get the authenticator to evaluate at least the Van Gogh? To show 1, that it's real (which we know, Axe isn't trying to say that it's a replica at this point) and 2, it has red wine on it? Even if Axe had it cleaned no way all traces of that wine are gone. That would prove Axe had the original in his apartment when he said he had the replica. I DON'T GET IT.
 

Yorkie

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Posts
5,412
Media
79
Likes
4,499
Points
358
Location
England (United Kingdom)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
The Addams Family 2019 cartoon..

Me and my love are a flesh and blood version of Morticia and Gomez
I'd be happy to have you living next door. :cool:

It's animation for me too tonight, Bojack Horseman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tight_N_Juicy