People earning over £150K in the UK from a regular job, will be paying a standard rate of 63% from next April, acually, there are increments from 53% from £100K. Then you get all the other taxes which Flash mentions, and some more. The irony is that the government knows that it will have no effect on the overall tax take.
Do people think that it is fair or sensible to tax high earners like this?
D, as i have always said, i am a "high earner"...and i do support progressive taxation, absolutely...
my problem has always been "where is the line"?
my parents and grandparents were and are all high earners, and we have already gotten hit with one inheritance/estate tax when my grandparents passed...the next time we get hit, will be when my dad goes, and the bill will cause me and my mother to sell his business, which will cause many long time employees to lose their jobs.
i will also have to sell a home that has been in my family for decades, because its value is so high now, wheras it was cheap to buy the land and build the home in the late 60s.
-
the new levels of taxation on high earners in both federal income tax and new "healthcare surtax" to be instituted here in the US are taking us back to the 1970s in terms of previous rates on high earners, though not as extreme.
i watched in horror as the UK instituted the new tax on high earners (watch as all the high earning footballers flee to Spain eventually)
the question becomes, what is the line?
i support progressive taxation...however, i think it is "fair", that nobody, rich or poor, should have to surrender more than 25% of their yearly earnings in income tax to the federal government, as a point of principle.
also, the estate/inheritance tax is absolutely abominable. it has already been taxed several times, and is what your family has earned through its entire lifetime. it is a true "vulture" tax IMO.
a single person, making $600,000 a year, living in California, is going to get absolutely *smashed* in the coming years.