What does it mean when you're 100% straight and still get turned on by dick?

[deleted1048037]

This is another example of why sexuality labels, simply, don't work. I think every human being is born with an interest in both genders sexually, it's just whether they act on their sexual feelings or not. A woman can't say she doesn't find other woman attractive and a man can't say he doesn't find other men attractive.

Sexuality labels should just disappear now. They are old fashioned and they don't fit in with today's rising sexual diversity. Labels aren't accurate and they can be misleading. Sexuality labels were created to cause division in society because people didn't understand it and were afraid of it, for whatever reason. I think it's safe to say, homosexuality is part of life and so human beings just need to accept it. Using labels, is like half acceptance, as far as i'm concerned.

 

[Frodo46888]

Sexual orientation is on a continuum, with practically no one at the extremes. Practically no one is 100% straight or 100% gay. The ones who would protest this statement are almost surely not 100%!

 

[butch manley]

Gay means you sometimes get a hard on looking at men, but never with women (4%)
Straight means you sometimes get a hard on looking at women, but never with men (75%)
Bi means you sometimes get a hard on looking at men, and sometimes looking at women (1%).
This leaves the 20% who have at least jacked off with another man at some time in their life (20%)
If you have jacked off with another man, you are not more than 99% straight.
(you did get a hard on when you jacked off with him, remember?).
If you ever think about doing it again, you may be 10%-20% gay and 80%-90% straight.
If you have jacked off with another man more than once, you are not more than 80% straight.
If you have NEVER in your life had even a slight a twinge in your dick looking at, showering with, wrestling with, hugging, drinking with, thinking about, or dreaming about a man, you may be 100% straight. It's rare.
If you have ever fucked a man, you are not more than 80% straight (you had a hard on, remember?).
If you have ever been fucked by a man, you are not more than 70% straight.
If you liked being fucked by a man, and think about doing it again, you could not possibly be more than 50% straight, and probably way less.

 

[Mickey1234]

Gay means you sometimes get a hard on looking at men, but never with women (4%)
Straight means you sometimes get a hard on looking at women, but never with men (75%)
Bi means you sometimes get a hard on looking at men, and sometimes looking at women (1%).
This leaves the 20% who have at least jacked off with another man at some time in their life (20%)
If you have jacked off with another man, you are not more than 99% straight.
(you did get a hard on when you jacked off with him, remember?).
If you ever think about doing it again, you may be 10%-20% gay and 80%-90% straight.
If you have jacked off with another man more than once, you are not more than 80% straight.
If you have NEVER in your life had even a slight a twinge in your dick looking at, showering with, wrestling with, hugging, drinking with, thinking about, or dreaming about a man, you may be 100% straight. It's rare.
If you have ever fucked a man, you are not more than 80% straight (you had a hard on, remember?).
If you have ever been fucked by a man, you are not more than 70% straight.
If you liked being fucked by a man, and think about doing it again, you could not possibly be more than 50% straight, and probably way less.

Love how you think you have all the numbers. Are you a professional researcher?

 

[328982]

Obviously you can't be 100% straight if you get turned on by other men's dicks, assuming you buy into the percentages/labels in the first place. Of course you can be 100% straight on this site. I think the question is whether you can 'legitimately' be straight if you are not 100% straight.

 

[Notaes]

I think most males have some interest in both sexes to a degree. I consider myself straight married for a long long time to same woman and love eating pussy and fucking pussy. a handsome well fit man will get my attention. I compare my cock to others when I see someone else cock. I a, curious how I compare to other dudes. I think most honest males would admit some curious feelings about our same sex.

 

[328982]

Love how you think you have all the numbers. Are you a professional researcher?

Yes, love how you lose 50 'butch manly' points for been fucked rather than fucking Since I don't care for either that makes me... er, still gay as a goose.

 

[Shackleford]

There are the men on here who do not have interest in another man sexually or romantically, but who are comfy enough with their sexuality to acknowledge if another man has an impressive physique. Who found the site from some method or other and may enjoy being an exhibitionist, or who genuinely is seeking advisement on some issues.

I only "liked" this because there's no "standing ovation" button.

 

[bigbull29]

Of course you can be 100% straight on this site

100% straight women. Absolutely! LOL.

 

[ericbear]

An acquaintance of mine produced B-grade porn back in the 80's, both gay and straight. From his standpoint as a commercially successful producer, both were identical. Both were made for men and men only. Fundamentally, all men, gay or straight, want to see exactly the same thing. Men like to see something dominated by their big, powerful cock and their male essence. They want to see something utterly inundated in their cum. The want to think that their cum is the last word, and that after they have fucked, that hole is so satisfied/sore/destroyed/stretched-out/flooded/whatever that it will want no more until their seed has taken hold. They want to think that their seed is so copious and their fuck so powerful that it will displace whatever might have been there before. That is what makes an undeniably virile man in the context of porn.

The only difference between gay and straight is the environment in which this occurs. If straight porn were really about being turned on by females, straight male porn stars would all be fat, bald, and have 4-inch dicks that dribbled a couple of pathetic drops into the cunts of gorgeous women while they held a Budweiser in the other hand. But it's not; it's about the power of a big powerful cock to blast huge jets of cum, rendering the recipient so satisfied as to have no further desire or even capability for sex. All men like their cocks, the power of their fuck, the size of their load. The only difference is where they prefer to deposit it.

So if you are 100% straight, and like seeing a horsedick drown some face in a huge wash of cum, don't worry: you are 100% hetero normal.

 

[figgnewton]

An acquaintance of mine produced B-grade porn back in the 80's, both gay and straight. From his standpoint as a commercially successful producer, both were identical. Both were made for men and men only. Fundamentally, all men, gay or straight, want to see exactly the same thing. Men like to see something dominated by their big, powerful cock and their male essence. They want to see something utterly inundated in their cum. The want to think that their cum is the last word, and that after they have fucked, that hole is so satisfied/sore/destroyed/stretched-out/flooded/whatever that it will want no more until their seed has taken hold. They want to think that their seed is so copious and their fuck so powerful that it will displace whatever might have been there before. That is what makes an undeniably virile man in the context of porn.

The only difference between gay and straight is the environment in which this occurs. If straight porn were really about being turned on by females, straight male porn stars would all be fat, bald, and have 4-inch dicks that dribbled a couple of pathetic drops into the cunts of gorgeous women while they held a Budweiser in the other hand. But it's not; it's about the power of a big powerful cock to blast huge jets of cum, rendering the recipient so satisfied as to have no further desire or even capability for sex. All men like their cocks, the power of their fuck, the size of their load. The only difference is where they prefer to deposit it.

So if you are 100% straight, and like seeing a horsedick drown some face in a huge wash of cum, don't worry: you are 100% hetero normal.

Right on and Amen.

 

[Smoldering]

"What does it mean?"

It means you have a pulse and you worry way too much about labels.

 

[328982]

Just once? What if he doesn't like it? What if he only likes it a little? What if in his lifetime there are fewer than 5 men to whom he could find himself sexually attracted? What if he can't get turned on enough for same-sex play unless there is an attractive woman to watch or direct?

I don't call myself bisexual because with that particular label, people automatically assume the attraction is equal. For me, it is NOT. Even a very pretty woman with a body I like is less likely to stir up a sexual response in me than a man who is further away from my physical ideal. I would align my life with a man's, but no woman has ever tempted me into daydreams of making a family and growing old together. Another woman living in my house? GTFO. I hate living with women. Furthermore, most of the women I laid with were disappointing and unsatisfactory sexual partners for me. Then there's the fact that most of the women with whom I would like to have sexual contact find a way to turn me off before I can express my burgeoning interest. I've never been distracted by the fantasy or memory of sex with any particular woman, but a man can really get under my skin and spoil my focus. If I think fucking a guy might wreck our friendship, I'll want to discuss that concern, but I can be talked into sex anyway. If I think sex will spoil a friendship with a woman, sex is off-limits. If semen seeps into my panties after sexual contact, I'm turned on again automatically. The very idea of another woman's fluids in my underwear disgusts me. It just isn't anywhere near 50-50 attraction. If I could find a man who was just right for me, I could easily never lay hands on another woman, and not ever give it a second thought, as happens whenever I am monogamous. I have never thought any woman I got physical with could make me not want to ride a real penis on a regular basis. I can't even watch "lesbian" porn scenes because for me, sex without a penis is almost without a purpose, and so many of my same-sex interactions have been boring and tedious.

I do believe sexual orientation is fluid and spectral, but I can quantify mine. I call myself heteroflexible, because I'm mostly oriented toward sex and love with cis-male people, but have experienced significant attraction to trans-male and cis-female people as well. I have never been attracted to any trans-women. Most of the time I report as heterosexual if asked, to avoid confusion or hurting the feelings of a female acquaintance who wants to initiate adult situations with me. But my actual self-identifying label of choice is heteroflexible. I very strongly prefer dudes, but there are women I could hook up with casually.

As a homoflexible male, I can really identify with this. There does seem to be a lot more tolerance though for the idea of a heteroflexible female than heteroflexible male. A man who reports as heterosexual but may dabble occasionally/casually with other men (or even considers it) is often characterised as gay/bi in denial, not 'genuinely' straight, probably with dubious motives or emotionally untrustworthy - even possibly a vector of disease between gay/bi and straight populations. None of these moral judgements seem to attach to heteroflexible women. There seems less flexibility allowed for men inherently, so the idea of male heteroflexibility is discouraged - particularly by hardliners who insist you can't report as straight unless you are 100% straight, as a man that is. This struck me quite forcibly when I joined the site - the policing of male sexuality by straight and gays alike, actually. I'm sure others will disagree.

 

[328982]

Basically what I'm saying is that straight women are allowed to be bicurious or heteroflexible without their self-identification being called into question, without being tipped into the 'at best bi' category, men aren't.

 

[693987]

As a homoflexible male, I can really identify with this. There does seem to be a lot more tolerance though for the idea of a heteroflexible female than heteroflexible male. A man who reports as heterosexual but may dabble occasionally/casually with other men (or even considers it) is often characterised as gay/bi in denial, not 'genuinely' straight, probably with dubious motives or emotionally untrustworthy - even possibly a vector of disease between gay/bi and straight populations. None of these moral judgements seem to attach to heteroflexible women. There seems less flexibility allowed for men inherently, so the idea of male heteroflexibility is discouraged - particularly by hardliners who insist you can't report as straight unless you are 100% straight, as a man that is. This struck me quite forcibly when I joined the site - the policing of male sexuality by straight and gays alike, actually. I'm sure others will disagree.

See, if someone identifies as hetero or homo flexible, that's peachy by me. The "I am a 100% straight man, I just suck a lot of dicks" etc is the one that makes me go "Fucking really?". Even if someone is like "yeah, I'm something other than 100% whatever", sure, okay, you do you. This is a super LGBT friendly site, so it confuses the hell out of me why some individuals on here are closet cases. People can have a very vague username, not post personal information, create an alternate email account, not post photos where they're identifiable, and be completely anonymous if for whatever reason they really really can't let anyone know who they are outside of this site.

I mean, as much as some may have an issue with the percentiles people can list, they do under some circumstances provide potentially useful information.

Even as a bi/queer/pan sort of female I can tell you that I most definitely have gotten judged, scorned, etc for my orientation. It may not be as commonly or openly seen as what you might see directed as men, but it definitely exists.

 

[328982]

See, if someone identifies as hetero or homo flexible, that's peachy by me. The "I am a 100% straight man, I just suck a lot of dicks" etc is the one that makes me go "Fucking really?". Even if someone is like "yeah, I'm something other than 100% whatever", sure, okay, you do you. This is a super LGBT friendly site, so it confuses the hell out of me why some individuals on here are closet cases. People can have a very vague username, not post personal information, create an alternate email account, not post photos where they're identifiable, and be completely anonymous if for whatever reason they really really can't let anyone know who they are outside of this site.

Even as a bi/queer/pan sort of female I can tell you that I most definitely have gotten judged, scorned, etc for my orientation. It may not be as commonly or openly seen as what you might see directed as men, but it definitely exists.

Yes, I agree that "I'm a 100% straight man, I just suck a lot of dicks" makes no sense. But even the way you've put that sounds a bit judgemental ("suck a lot of dicks"). Maybe they just sucked one in their life. But there's a large and vocal contingent on here who'd say they can't be straight at all unless they are 100% straight, have never been turned on by another man. And I'm sorry but that line doesn't seem to be applied in such an inflexible way to women, from what I've seen.

 

[328982]

See, if someone identifies as hetero or homo flexible, that's peachy by me. The "I am a 100% straight man, I just suck a lot of dicks" etc is the one that makes me go "Fucking really?". Even if someone is like "yeah, I'm something other than 100% whatever", sure, okay, you do you. This is a super LGBT friendly site, so it confuses the hell out of me why some individuals on here are closet cases. People can have a very vague username, not post personal information, create an alternate email account, not post photos where they're identifiable, and be completely anonymous if for whatever reason they really really can't let anyone know who they are outside of this site.

I mean, as much as some may have an issue with the percentiles people can list, they do under some circumstances provide potentially useful information.

Even as a bi/queer/pan sort of female I can tell you that I most definitely have gotten judged, scorned, etc for my orientation. It may not be as commonly or openly seen as what you might see directed as men, but it definitely exists.

And you assume they are closet cases, in denial, but maybe like Alteredego they genuinely identify as heteroflexible because bi doesn't accurately describe what they really are, or isn't understood correctly.

 

[693987]

Yes, I agree that "I'm a 100% straight man, I just suck a lot of dicks" makes no sense. But even the way you've put that sounds a bit judgemental ("suck a lot of dicks"). Maybe they just sucked one in their life. But there's a large and vocal contingent on here who'd say they can't be straight at all unless they are 100% straight, have never been turned on by another man. And I'm sorry but that line doesn't seem to be applied in such an inflexible way to women, from what I've seen.

I specified a lot of dicks for a reason. Not I fooled around with someone once. Not I may find a specific individual outside of what is my norm attractive. Thus the "sucked a lot of dicks" and seeing that as someone being a closet case.

So, you can take your unfounded assumptions after I chose my words carefully and put them I don't care where.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

How weird does it sound to say, I'm married but my face falls into pussy on the regular and I label myself straight. Honey, you are on the bi spectrum. And there is indeed a spectrum.

 

[328982]

I specified a lot of dicks for a reason. Not I fooled around with someone once. Not I may find a specific individual outside of what is my norm attractive. Thus the "sucked a lot of dicks" and seeing that as someone being a closet case.

So, you can take your unfounded assumptions after I chose my words carefully and put them I don't care where.

I get what you're saying - but you are choosing quite an extreme example of the "100% straight man who sucks lots of dicks", whereas I'm talking about the greyer area of men who identify as basically straight (not 100% necessarily, say 80/20) but aren't allowed that identification because of casual/occasional interest in other men. Btw, let's not be rude to each other, I thought we were having a decent discussion.