I would say any girth bigger than mine, so +5.75".
But approx the same girth from base to glans.
I ve seen pics with a big girth at the base, but a much smaller shaft.
Also a small shaft with a girthy glans.
Then even a +6" girth isn t so hung.
I think it's a fair assumption that +1SD (one standard deviation) above average of anything would be considered large. In the case of girth, and this site:
Not enough choices in the poll actually, biggest listed was 6.5" girth, and I don't consider that to be "hung" as it matches my own girth and I don't consider myself to be "hung" sure I'm a little over average, but not "hung"
Interesting that 6" girth is usually paired with 8" length in colloquial speech when talking about "big dicks", but the threads have 7" for hung length and 6" for hung girth.
I wonder if people are somehow better at judging girth than length or vice versa?
Well tangible or impressive girth is pretty rare. Long dicks are common by comparison. I am only 7" long but guys of the same length or or longer also are fascinated with my girth and even drool or express envy or frustration over it. And I can tell you, there is nothing like making a BBC look smaller next to me or making a BBC consider me part of the big boys.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.