What happened? Removed threads?

TallCurvyCutie

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Posts
129
Media
40
Likes
35
Points
253
Location
West Coast, United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
Thanks, Mme! I think you may have saved me that expanded follow up post I promised!

Here goes anyway... :tongue:

But Yes, it is a concern that a lot of the guys she has sex with don't wear a condom, and pump her full of cum.

Dear sir, as I recall, you were one of the main proponents of more pics and said the lack of protection was HOT. Geographical considerations be damned, the county clinic might be full of former participants. Ever hear of 6 degrees of separation? That is TOO FEW between me and an STD, thanks.

Come on guys (and ladies), let's be serious.
If the real reason behind all this is the STD issue, there had been A LOT of discussion about it, not threads misteriously disappearing while no one's looking.
[...]
Why on earth a user should be 'warned' not to give away their new address, without a proper explanation?

No, they never ONCE answered any question as to if they are STD positive. I followed the thread under the premise of watching humanity do what it does best: defy logic. They were clearly banned for a reason, and directing the membership elsewhere to follow them is advertising, nevermind chasing after something the mods had more sense than letting see the light of day. Additionally, why would threads remain that were pretty much no more than links to pics in a profile that no longer exists, rendering them inaccessible?
 
Last edited:

Tattooed Goddess

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Posts
14,088
Media
70
Likes
20,572
Points
668
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Female
Also, being banned for advertisements or for putting up pictures without your permission, or photos you say are you when they are not would render them to remove all of your content as it would continue to advertise and/or deceive the membership or violate copyright laws.

Someone call the Wahhhmbulance.
 

TallCurvyCutie

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Posts
129
Media
40
Likes
35
Points
253
Location
West Coast, United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
Also, being banned for advertisements or for putting up pictures without your permission, or photos you say are you when they are not would render them to remove all of your content as it would continue to advertise and/or deceive the membership or violate copyright laws.

Someone call the Wahhhmbulance.

Mmes, I barely knows ya, but I loves ya already. :biggrin1:

I REALLY do not understand this.
In order:
(1)- 'Their only follow up', they actually maintained quite a prolonged chat with many other users, answering questions and posting updates.

(2)- About STDs, I remember them answering, even if they did only once.

(3)- Their "posting themselves everywere"... Look, if you go online willing to post pics of yourself having sex, I think it can be said you are someway exhibitionist, you like the resulting attention/reaction. Just like ALL other users tend to be voyeurs, meaning they LOVE to see such pics.
Isn't that 'posting around' meant to be the purpose of a forum like this?

(4)- 'There have been issues of the not consenting', this one's the one I understand less. Do you really believe it? I cannot even imagine how something like that came into your mind. They even planned and performed a meeting with more than a single LPSG user, posting online a few of the resulting photos. But yes, she could be against it. WTF?!?!?

(5)- 'trolling for pics', strange enough, considering THEY were the ones posting all the pics so many kept asking for.

Then again, perhaps I'm not using my 'gray matter brain' and they were the greatest con artists. Perhaps it was a single fat nerd building an incredibly complicated fake identity.
In that case, please let him go on, it's still the most interesing thing on LPSG.

1. If by prolonged chat you mean adding more pictures with very brief commentary to stoke interest, then yes.

2. Nope, never. You can see how I know above.

3. They posted pics, allegedly of themselves, although the men in pics were NOT the member usually, across SEVERAL threads in different areas. There is the SHOW OFF forum for that, not interjecting themselves all over the place every chance they got. I believe such extensive cross posting might be against ToS too. The user eventually hyped starting a potential website. This may likely have been a ploy from day 1 to drum up a fan base to transfer over.

4. Just because the woman allowed pictures to be taken of her DOES NOT mean she consented to them being posted on LPSG. If you are going to try using my words against me, please copy and paste them so they are quoted properly. Who says or has any evidence their event actually happened? The one who said he was there, not sure his standing on here. Anyone can play along. Also, those men may not have agreed to being blasted all over threads.

5. Those pics, be them of said member and his girlfriend or not, and posting an email address for members to contact them offsite, would bait many guys to send their pics in turn with the hope of being picked, and is essentially trolling.
 
Last edited:

D_Phil_R_Upp

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Posts
356
Media
0
Likes
101
Points
113
Sexuality
No Response
Uploading Photos and Videos to the gallery, albums or videos section: This site allows its members to share photos and videos with each other. However, uploading photos or videos that do not belong to you is strictly forbidden.

Slightly OT to this thread but - wow, that's news to me. We have a ton of accounts where guys post dozens if not hundreds of photos that are NOT them - usually porn stars, guys they find hot, etc. I did not know that was a violation of TOS.
 

Tattooed Goddess

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Posts
14,088
Media
70
Likes
20,572
Points
668
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Female
Slightly OT to this thread but - wow, that's news to me. We have a ton of accounts where guys post dozens if not hundreds of photos that are NOT them - usually porn stars, guys they find hot, etc. I did not know that was a violation of TOS.

uploading images and videos of a person who is not you when you say it is violates the deceiving membership rule. Maybe some mods can chime in on this but I'm pretty sure if someone has a zillion photos of a bunch of porn stars they aren't fooling anyone.
 

hungryman40

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Posts
505
Media
1
Likes
68
Points
113
Location
Canberra Australia
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
I think it would be FANTASTIC if the person/s who decided to ban them decided to open up their mouth and just TELL us why they were banned. would have saved a LOT of typing and bullshit on everyone's part.

Is that really too much to ask?

One simple sentence saying "They were banned because________" would suffice. Maybe a little bit of explanation or SOMETHING?

Oh well, such is life online...
 

hungryman40

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Posts
505
Media
1
Likes
68
Points
113
Location
Canberra Australia
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
I think it's interesting that a bunch of guys are asking "What happened?" while a bunch of ladies are telling us what they "Think" might have happened.. and the moderators sit back and don't comment.. even though they are the only ones who KNOW!
 

Richard Lottery

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Cammer
Joined
Oct 10, 2011
Posts
131
Media
10
Likes
380
Points
343
Verification
View
Gender
Male
Even though im pretty sure 95% of the posts on the Personal threads that are not Guys 4 Guys is bullshit certain measures could be taken like requiring a Verified Photo in profile to even start one period, Also those threads with Guys looking for Guys for their Girl should be banned as well, just have the woman post it's ridiculous...It would atleast downsize the flakes and fakes, i also think couples should verify themselves within the same pic...
 

D_Tinker Ball

1st Like
Joined
May 28, 2008
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
Last answer, then I'll give up.
This all discussion seems VERY unlogical to me. Like someone already noticed, me and a few others asking what happened, someone else looking for explanation based on guess.
You may believe what you want, but the persistent and total lack of answers from those who know - and did the fact - sounds much more interesting and - unfortunately - convincing than most personal opinions, mine included.

I was only asking for that answers, from the person who removed the threads. Nothing more. Not even saying it can't be for the reasons summarized here.
But still nothing to report.
Commercial advertisement - not previously approved by the owner of LPSG
Please note that they moved to Zoig after being banned. Obviously, the posts 'advertising' their relocation came from OTHER users. Can you consider this 'commercial ad'? I don't, since there's no direct economical interest. But if you do, in that case the other users should be banned too, not 'warned' with no explanation.
And the threads should still be here.

Use by more than one person of the same account - friends and partners are required to create their own account, no more than one person is permitted to access this site via the same account.
My opinion is that this forum, just like everyone else, sees far bigger violations every day. But fine, let's use this reason: it's reason enough for being banned.
Not removing threads.

Uploading Photos and Videos to the gallery, albums or videos section: This site allows its members to share photos and videos with each other. However, uploading photos or videos that do not belong to you is strictly forbidden.
Hard to debate about this. I say I see no reason to doubt the pics' ownership, you say you do.
Again, I seem to recall there's been at least two independent users who met them in real life. They could be fake identities, yes. Then we're talking about a great conspiracy, and I won't say anything else till I see the Zapruder film.
Seriously, to consider it a huge plot, with fake identities, lot of congruent pics, durable stories and so on, I would question the reason to do that.
As long as they were on LPSG, the only ones gaining from them were the owners of forum itself.
So, if you're trying to convince me it was a plot, fine: in that case I'll answer the only possible outcome is, 'they' were the owners of this site, trying to induce users getting a gold account and pay.

Notwithstanding the above conditions, LPSG reserves the right to deny access to any member, at its sole discretion.
That's my point.
All this can be very easily explained by an act of pure and simple will, the 'sole discretion' of the moderator who removed the threads.
Fine.
May I say I don't like being in a forum where moderator acts this way?

No, they never ONCE answered any question as to if they are STD positive. I followed the thread under the premise of watching humanity do what it does best: defy logic.
As I said, I remember them answering this question in another thread: as you mentioned, they usually posted in a lot of different places.
I could be wrong, of course, since for sure I did not follow them like someone else seemed to do. I just stumbled upon their post here and there.
But perhaps, could you be wrong too?
The answer I seem to remember, btw, was actually very simple. STDs becomes THE issue only when you set up a meeting and you're certain you'll meet the person in real life. In that case, you talk about STDs with the single person, in real life, and do what you need to do.
Beyond that, I see no particular reason to repeat other and other the same thing.

[btw, I consider amusing that on one hand, you say "they just kept posting new pics, never answering direct question, so they must be fake", on the other you accuse them of STDs because they never answered STDs' related question, in particular, "so they have STDs too".
Something not far from saying "he's mute, because he never talk. And he's dishonest too, because he never answered whethere he was onest or not". :) ]

They were clearly banned for a reason, and directing the membership elsewhere to follow them is advertising
It's so 'clear' that they actually never did that, because they couldn't. They were already banned. It was other users, like hungryman, to do that and without 'commercial interest'. And they have been warned.

Additionally, why would threads remain that were pretty much no more than links to pics in a profile that no longer exists, rendering them inaccessible?
That's the absurd part. You're trying to convince me of something, without actually answering my questions.
Why remove the thread?
Why act without a single explanation?

I think it would be FANTASTIC if the person/s who decided to ban them decided to open up their mouth and just TELL us why they were banned. would have saved a LOT of typing and bullshit on everyone's part.

Is that really too much to ask?
Actually, it was THE ONLY answer I was looking for.

Now I find myself arguing about this all story, being accused of reasoning 'by my fleshy mind', when I really have little interest in them. I never even considered looking for them in Zoig. If I want porn, I can have plenty, like everyone else.
I just do not like this way of conduct, and I'd like to know what really happened.
You may think the reasons provided by independent users on this thread are enough to explain. I certainly don't.
 

novice_btm

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Posts
9,891
Media
18
Likes
4,559
Points
358
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
I think it would be FANTASTIC if the person/s who decided to ban them decided to open up their mouth and just TELL us why they were banned. would have saved a LOT of typing and bullshit on everyone's part.

Is that really too much to ask?

One simple sentence saying "They were banned because________" would suffice. Maybe a little bit of explanation or SOMETHING?
The reason has been listed several times, and is also in the Mod Actions thread. I've also told you directly in a PM. At this point, it can only be assumed that you're publicly posting all of this to stir up things.

To clarify for others, *A* person never makes decisions on a ban. There is a Moderating TEAM, and all actions are done upon an agreement by the team. You can look and ANY banning that has ever been done here, and you will NEVER see a public discussion of it by the Mods. It's just not done, never has been, never will.

As far as posting information about their whereabouts online now, we have no idea if they want you giving out whatever address, link, or whatever about them. So, again, this part of the ToS is what covers that.

Publication of the personally identifiable information of individuals without their consent - This means real names, contact details, addresses, dates of birth, place of business and so on, and includes the distribution of such information via the forum, chat room, private message, instant chat message and linking to the information being held elsewhere via this site. Should you wish to post your own address and/or contact numbers, we request that you ask members to get in touch privately to request this information.
...and the moderators sit back and don't comment.. even though they are the only ones who KNOW!
See my first paragraph.

...but the persistent and total lack of answers from those who know - and did the fact - sounds much more interesting and - unfortunately - convincing than most personal opinions, mine included.

I was only asking for that answers, from the person who removed the threads. Nothing more...

...All this can be very easily explained by an act of pure and simple will, the 'sole discretion' of the moderator who removed the threads.
Fine.
May I say I don't like being in a forum where moderator acts this way?
...
Again, Mods can't, and don't, act on "sole discretion". It's a group discussion and vote.

By the end, both of those threads, were riddled ToS violations, as well as people still addressing the long gone original posters, etc.
 
Last edited:

D_Tinker Ball

1st Like
Joined
May 28, 2008
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
Ah, ok. Now I understand.
As far as posting information about their whereabouts online now, we have no idea if they want you giving out whatever address, link, or whatever about them. So, again, this part of the ToS is what covers that.
Publication of the personally identifiable information of individuals without their consent - This means real names, contact details, addresses, dates of birth, place of business and so on, and includes the distribution of such information via the forum, chat room, private message, instant chat message and linking to the information being held elsewhere via this site. Should you wish to post your own address and/or contact numbers, we request that you ask members to get in touch privately to request this information.
So their new Zoig address cannot be diffused because "we have no idea if they want you giving out whatever address"?
That's great.
Please shut down and remove also ALL thread in the 'Adult Websites' section, and many others. How on earth can we post link to amateur pics and vids, since we never have proof that the protagonists agree?

Come on, seriously? Am I the only one to consider this ridiculous?
I personally have no idea of their real name, address, phone number or whatsoever. A URL address is none of the above. It's not that posting a link break the forum rules, even if by chance at that page they publish their own data. That's their choice, it's not the LPSG poster releasing private details out of their control.
You may state otherwise, but in that case there are so many other threads to remove. Included every single profile page; how can you be sure each user isn't publishing someone else's personal information?!?!

By the end, both of those threads, were riddled ToS violations, as well as people still addressing the long gone original posters, etc.
'Riddled', no less.
And I still have to understand which violations, how stupid can I be?
Did she contact someone of the 'moderator team' saying that those were her photos, and she never agreed to post them online?
 

hungryman40

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Posts
505
Media
1
Likes
68
Points
113
Location
Canberra Australia
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
Novice Bottom:

Thanks for your clarification. If you PM's me this info, or posted anywhere in either of those forums (before they disappeared) or here, I apologise, I must have missed it.

Now I suppose it's impossible for either of them to log in again with two separate accounts, since we might all have their pictures, and any of us could log in and pretend to be either of them.

Oh well...
 

D_Tinker Ball

1st Like
Joined
May 28, 2008
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
By the way, just to testify how difficult it is to find their new address (with no violation of the notorious LPSG ToS, of course), I'd suggest trying something very complicated with the latest web advancement: it's called Google.

I hope this will prove how deeply worried I am about their unfortunate departure.


[oooops, perhaps I posted a forbidden link, considering that it can trace back to their secret identities! Just hoping that I'll get extenuating circumstances, considering the origin is LPSG itself.]
 
Last edited:

novice_btm

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Posts
9,891
Media
18
Likes
4,559
Points
358
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
Novice Bottom:

Thanks for your clarification. If you PM's me this info, or posted anywhere in either of those forums (before they disappeared) or here, I apologise, I must have missed it.

Now I suppose it's impossible for either of them to log in again with two separate accounts, since we might all have their pictures, and any of us could log in and pretend to be either of them.

Oh well...
Where you're telling everyone that you received a warning... that happened in a PM, and the clarification is contained in the very same one.
:smile:
 

novice_btm

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Posts
9,891
Media
18
Likes
4,559
Points
358
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
@theleviathan: You inadvertently bring up a very good point. Couples accounts aren't allowed here. Individuals need to have individual accounts. In all of the photos that were posted, HE wasn't posting pics of himself, or maybe he was, but there were so many various men in the pics, that if he was in one of them, we have no way of knowing that, because he never ID'd himself in any of the pics. The pics that were posted, were of HER. We have no idea if he had her permission. If SHE wanted her pics posted, then she should've opened her own account and posted them.
 

D_Tinker Ball

1st Like
Joined
May 28, 2008
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
So if he had created the account with setting 'female' from the beginning, everything would have been fine?

Why his account wasn't disabled before, considering his posting pics continued for months? Or, if you prefer, why arent't similarly banned other users posting pics of undistinguishable people?

Why removing entire threads, if the pics were made immediately unavailable by banning the user? Exactly which were the many violations riddling those threads?
 

TallCurvyCutie

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Posts
129
Media
40
Likes
35
Points
253
Location
West Coast, United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
novice_btm, thanks for chiming in to confirm much of what Mme Rouge and I had to say was more than mere speculation, what the women "think" according to hungry, and that between the two us, we were correct about MULTIPLE violations by the former user in those threads. I am fairly new, but do have literacy skills and the ability to follow directions! :biggrin1: You are a good sport to appease these guys publicly after doing so individually. Common sense and reason seem to be so often lost on people adamant about a cause. :tongue: Now I think I should bow out lest I get myself in trouble for continuing what seems to be a resolved thread and lead to its deletion in the process! :lmao:
 

MelbourneGirl

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Posts
141
Media
6
Likes
385
Points
333
Location
Down Under
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Female
@theleviathan, I think the most important TOS is the following;

Notwithstanding the above conditions, LPSG reserves the right to deny access to any member, at its sole discretion.

That of course means that should LPSG moderators / management decide they don't like our usernames, don't like our pics, goodness, it even means if they don't like the colour we've chosen for our signature - guess what? We can be banned. You may not like that and you may not think it fair, but that's just the way it goes.

The moderators are under absolutely no obligation to explain the decisions they make. If we don't like what they do, we can of course exercise our right to vote with our cyber feet.