What happened? Removed threads?

TallCurvyCutie

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Posts
129
Media
40
Likes
35
Points
253
Location
West Coast, United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
Also, the user was never VERIFIED. How difficult is it to do if one has THAT many pictures and is real, FFS? :rolleyes:

theleviathan, you seem to see this one tree, and not entire FOREST of reasons given. The user was banned. There was no point leaving threads containing links to nowhere and which were full of breaches in ToS. It happens. Oh well. Get over it.
 
Last edited:
5

554279

Guest
Their only follow up to questions was to post more pics. They never addressed inquiries about their STD status or lack of protection. They posted across every thread they could seemingly try to insert themselves as relevant. There also may have been issues of her not consenting to the images posted since it was him doing all the interacting. To me, the user seemed to be here for no more than promoting themselves and trolling for pics. Men, use your gray matter brain, not the fleshy one in your pants, and you will likely answer many of your own questions...

Amen. If something looks to good to be true it probably is.
 

D_Tinker Ball

1st Like
Joined
May 28, 2008
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
I give up.
It seems it's plenty of people convinced that internet administrators have Gestapo powers (which is not true), and happy for it.
You don't like my face? Kill me out.
You don't like what I say? Remove every trace of my posts.

How can I discuss with someone who answers "should LPSG moderators decide they don't like our usernames, don't like our pics, goodness, it even means if they don't like the colour we've chosen for our signature - guess what? We can be banned. You may not like that and you may not think it fair, but that's just the way it goes" ?
Sorry but you're born to be oppressed. Now that's the way it goes.
You're just a sheep, useful only as long as your pics and stories bring money to the forum's owners.
I'll be more than happy to leave this land of freedom all for yourself.


@tallcurvycutie, sorry but you too live in your own pink and beautiful world. You keep talking about "a forest of reasons given". Perhaps you should read again (and again) the post from novice_btm, supposedly containing this 'forest':
The reason has been listed several times, and is also in the Mod Actions thread. I've also told you directly in a PM. At this point, it can only be assumed that you're publicly posting all of this to stir up things.
What, only one? And this single glorious reason being... what?
Good god, it was really that difficult to state once and for all. The SINGLE and ONLY time a reason have been 'listed' by those who know what it was has been in the Mod Actions thread (where, btw, moderators are supposed to provide information about their decisions; this about "The moderators are under absolutely no obligation to explain the decisions they make"), and it was 'fake gender'.
The same novice_btm posts explained that couple accounts are not allowed, so THAT (and only that) is the reason. A quite poor 'forest'.
A forest of reasons which moreover, as the same novice_btm hinted, is continouosly violated by MANY.
None of them is banned.
Above all, no threads are removed.
In the end I'm still waiting to understand the riddle of horrible violations affecting those threads, especially considering that - as you say! - they were left pretty much empty.

Tallcurvycutie, you blathered about STDs and lack of verification, then the novice_btm answer came containing NONE of these, and you take it as a confirmation you were right?
Well, good for you.

You surely think I'm an offending prick, and what grieves me more is that youll never realize I'm just being rational.
And quite attached to my ideals, those ideals which Internet should foster and stand for. Not "they have any power, and no obligation to explain".
 

Tattooed Goddess

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Posts
14,088
Media
70
Likes
20,563
Points
668
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Female
So that's the "violation of ToS" you all are suggesting?
That's the reason to ban and remove threads?

Given that the photos could have been of someone who didn't give their permission, why would they leave any trace of that up? It could jeopardize their legal status to promote it.

Also, spammers get their shit removed all the time where there is ZERO trace of evidence of their registering and posting here.

Just find them elsewhere on the interwebz and jack off accordingly. It's not the end of the world.
 

TallCurvyCutie

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Posts
129
Media
40
Likes
35
Points
253
Location
West Coast, United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
As far as posting information about their whereabouts online now, we have no idea if they want you giving out whatever address, link, or whatever about them. So, again, this part of the ToS is what covers that.

Publication of the personally identifiable information of individuals without their consent - This means real names, contact details, addresses, dates of birth, place of business and so on, and includes the distribution of such information via the forum, chat room, private message, instant chat message and linking to the information being held elsewhere via this site. Should you wish to post your own address and/or contact numbers, we request that you ask members to get in touch privately to request this information.

By the end, both of those threads, were riddled ToS violations, as well as people still addressing the long gone original posters, etc.

Couples accounts aren't allowed here. Individuals need to have individual accounts.

In all of the photos that were posted, HE wasn't posting pics of himself, or maybe he was, but there were so many various men in the pics, that if he was in one of them, we have no way of knowing that, because he never ID'd himself in any of the pics.

The pics that were posted, were of HER. We have no idea if he had her permission. If SHE wanted her pics posted, then she should've opened her own account and posted them.

To me it is quite clearly implied this covers many of the indiscretions Mme Rouge and I mentioned...
 

woodyq

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Posts
547
Media
29
Likes
3,065
Points
523
Age
44
Location
New York (United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
@theleviathan: You inadvertently bring up a very good point. Couples accounts aren't allowed here. Individuals need to have individual accounts. In all of the photos that were posted, HE wasn't posting pics of himself, or maybe he was, but there were so many various men in the pics, that if he was in one of them, we have no way of knowing that, because he never ID'd himself in any of the pics. The pics that were posted, were of HER. We have no idea if he had her permission. If SHE wanted her pics posted, then she should've opened her own account and posted them.

i am a fan of a female on here and based on the size/color of the penises i see she has posted penises of several different men, how can we be sure she had their permission or that is her boobs/vagina in the pictures since her face is never in the same pictures as the penises/boobs/vagina?
 
5

554279

Guest
So that's the "violation of ToS" you all are suggesting?
That's the reason to ban and remove threads?

No I think you misunderstood me. IMHO I don't necessarily think people should be banned, etc if it is the usual harmless bullshitting. However if someone comes on and acts as a digital predator I think the mods have every right to take precautions.

If people don't like something or get offended, then they should leave. I have dropped off of a few sites because things were said or done that crossed my personal red lines.

My advice of being if something looks to good to be true it probably is, is for the younger horny males which we all once were to preclude them from sending information, pictures, videos and in some cases going out of their way to "hook up" with an invisible entity or possibly a nut case.
 

D_Tinker Ball

1st Like
Joined
May 28, 2008
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
Given that the photos could have been of someone who didn't give their permission, why would they leave any trace of that up? It could jeopardize their legal status to promote it.
The photos were removed the moment they banned the user, so there was no need to remove the threads too.

Then again, I've seen SO many other users posting pics with many more individuals involved - most of the times in the pic doesn't even appear a (supposed) LPSG user, being entirely depicting some else. It's just ludicrous to call this "a riddle of ToS violation" and use it not only to ban the user, but to remove the threads.

I'd like also to point out a very simple thing: even saying the user was never verified, there's NEVER even been a confirmation of its being fake.
So, a user have been banned under the more or less reasonable suspicion of being fake?
No, it's been banned because - being a couple - it changed the gender.

Well, no great reason has finally surfaced, unless someone keep thinking their were probably/perhaps spreading illnesses or trolling around (thus surely deserving total deletion), so I'd say it's useless to go on arguing.
Something strange happened, the moderators' team proved to have no obligation for an explanation. Fine.

I'll wonder sometime what could have been the real reason (in the end, I'm just real damn curious), and move on to another forum.
Cheers
 

D_Tinker Ball

1st Like
Joined
May 28, 2008
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
Almost forgot:
To me it is quite clearly implied this covers many of the indiscretions Mme Rouge and I mentioned...
"Personally identifiable information [...] means real names, contact details, addresses, dates of birth, place of business and so on."

1) If they were publishing so many personal informations, how come no one here knows their name, their addresses, their date of birth, to the point you're actually claiming they did not even really exist?

2) The only 'personal information' they published were those answering direct and precise questions in the LPSG profile page. Just like most other users.
On their profile page, which has been perfectly legal for months if not years, there was also their Zoig address. Which, btw, in my opinion is NOT 'personally idenfiable information'.

Not a single clue they were not what they said to be.
A not-even-that-much-reasonable doubt they could be fake.
 

woodyq

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Posts
547
Media
29
Likes
3,065
Points
523
Age
44
Location
New York (United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Their only follow up to questions was to post more pics. They never addressed inquiries about their STD status or lack of protection. They posted across every thread they could seemingly try to insert themselves as relevant. There also may have been issues of her not consenting to the images posted since it was him doing all the interacting. To me, the user seemed to be here for no more than promoting themselves and trolling for pics. Men, use your gray matter brain, not the fleshy one in your pants, and you will likely answer many of your own questions...

i asked you your height 3 times and you started with a avoid answer then "tall enough"...since you didn't answer directly should we ban you
?
 

Pecker

Retired Moderator
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Posts
54,502
Media
0
Likes
301
Points
283
I give up.
It seems it's plenty of people convinced that internet administrators have Gestapo powers (which is not true), and happy for it.
You don't like my face? Kill me out.
You don't like what I say? Remove every trace of my posts.

How can I discuss with someone who answers "should LPSG moderators decide they don't like our usernames, don't like our pics, goodness, it even means if they don't like the colour we've chosen for our signature - guess what? We can be banned. You may not like that and you may not think it fair, but that's just the way it goes" ?
Sorry but you're born to be oppressed. Now that's the way it goes.
You're just a sheep, useful only as long as your pics and stories bring money to the forum's owners.
I'll be more than happy to leave this land of freedom all for yourself.


@tallcurvycutie, sorry but you too live in your own pink and beautiful world. You keep talking about "a forest of reasons given". Perhaps you should read again (and again) the post from novice_btm, supposedly containing this 'forest':

What, only one? And this single glorious reason being... what?
Good god, it was really that difficult to state once and for all. The SINGLE and ONLY time a reason have been 'listed' by those who know what it was has been in the Mod Actions thread (where, btw, moderators are supposed to provide information about their decisions; this about "The moderators are under absolutely no obligation to explain the decisions they make"), and it was 'fake gender'.
The same novice_btm posts explained that couple accounts are not allowed, so THAT (and only that) is the reason. A quite poor 'forest'.
A forest of reasons which moreover, as the same novice_btm hinted, is continouosly violated by MANY.
None of them is banned.
Above all, no threads are removed.
In the end I'm still waiting to understand the riddle of horrible violations affecting those threads, especially considering that - as you say! - they were left pretty much empty.

Tallcurvycutie, you blathered about STDs and lack of verification, then the novice_btm answer came containing NONE of these, and you take it as a confirmation you were right?
Well, good for you.

You surely think I'm an offending prick, and what grieves me more is that youll never realize I'm just being rational.
And quite attached to my ideals, those ideals which Internet should foster and stand for. Not "they have any power, and no obligation to explain".

I don't know where you got the idea that no one on the internet has the right to run his/her site as he or she wishes. This one is owned and operated by Rob_E, who has appointed administrators and moderators to help him try to keep LPSG an informative, supportive and most of all a fun site for those who wish to participate. As owner he makes the rules. They aren't law - they are guidelines to enhance the enjoyment and smooth flow of the site by limiting those who would be disruptive or downright devious. This requires sending Heads Ups to some, Warnings to others, or even enforcing Temp Bans. Sometimes the only alternative is to permanently ban an account. These decisions are the results of a team discussion among the admins and mods - sometimes including Rob_E himself. It's a constantly evolving process and it's as fair as we can make it.

I doubt that my comments are going to change your mind, Mr. L., but many who read it will appreciate it. My best advice for you is that, if you are really unhappy with the state of affairs at LPSG then perhaps you'd be happier elsewhere. The internet is a big place and LPSG is just a tiny speck in comparison.

Perhaps zoig would be a good place for you to start looking?
 

TallCurvyCutie

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Posts
129
Media
40
Likes
35
Points
253
Location
West Coast, United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
I don't know where you got the idea that no one on the internet has the right to run his/her site as he or she wishes. This one is owned and operated by Rob_E, who has appointed administrators and moderators to help him try to keep LPSG an informative, supportive and most of all a fun site for those who wish to participate. As owner he makes the rules. They aren't law - they are guidelines to enhance the enjoyment and smooth flow of the site by limiting those who would be disruptive or downright devious. This requires sending Heads Ups to some, Warnings to others, or even enforcing Temp Bans. Sometimes the only alternative is to permanently ban an account. These decisions are the results of a team discussion among the admins and mods - sometimes including Rob_E himself. It's a constantly evolving process and it's as fair as we can make it.

I doubt that my comments are going to change your mind, Mr. L., but many who read it will appreciate it. My best advice for you is that, if you are really unhappy with the state of affairs at LPSG then perhaps you'd be happier elsewhere. The internet is a big place and LPSG is just a tiny speck in comparison.

Perhaps zoig would be a good place for you to start looking?

:arms: :arms: :arms:

3 moderators. ONE thread. If that does not convince someone to stop beating a dead horse, I have no idea what will! Pecker, thank you for expressing what theleviathan was not taking as what is from anyone else!
 
Last edited:

D_Tinker Ball

1st Like
Joined
May 28, 2008
Posts
283
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
103
I doubt that my comments are going to change your mind, Mr. L., but many who read it will appreciate it.
That's the sad part, and of course the only thing I'll remember about this discussion here.
The fact there's plenty of people who will appreciate the arbitrary limitations to their freedom, and even applaude ( :arms: :arms: :arms: , really? I'm sorry ) when you spend many words to explain your right to take it away from them, and not one word to explain your decision.

As you and them suggested, nope, I don't like it, ain't gonna accept it. This is clearly your feud, live happily ever after with your vassals.
Vassals which of course will consider me an exaggerated absurd prick. At least they're still free to do that.

I'm going to remove my account, also to avoid being someway sucked back into answering again.
Cheers
 

Tattooed Goddess

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Posts
14,088
Media
70
Likes
20,563
Points
668
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Female
That's the sad part, and of course the only thing I'll remember about this discussion here.
The fact there's plenty of people who will appreciate the arbitrary limitations to their freedom, and even applaude ( :arms: :arms: :arms: , really? I'm sorry ) when you spend many words to explain your right to take it away from them, and not one word to explain your decision.

As you and them suggested, nope, I don't like it, ain't gonna accept it. This is clearly your feud, live happily ever after with your vassals.
Vassals which of course will consider me an exaggerated absurd prick. At least they're still free to do that.

I'm going to remove my account, also to avoid being someway sucked back into answering again.
Cheers

Do I have your permission to do a dramatic reading of this post?

Sorta like this: Dot Dot Dot (Official Video HD) - YouTube
 
Last edited by a moderator:

bimetaldude

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2011
Posts
832
Media
11
Likes
43
Points
173
Location
Seattle, Washington
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
I remember getting sand in my mangina for a heads up a month or so ago. served me right because i did not read the rules clearly enough.... and i liked peckers reply in this thread
 

TallCurvyCutie

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Posts
129
Media
40
Likes
35
Points
253
Location
West Coast, United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
That's the sad part, and of course the only thing I'll remember about this discussion here.
The fact there's plenty of people who will appreciate the arbitrary limitations to their freedom, and even applaude ( :arms: :arms: :arms: , really? I'm sorry ) when you spend many words to explain your right to take it away from them, and not one word to explain your decision.

As you and them suggested, nope, I don't like it, ain't gonna accept it. This is clearly your feud, live happily ever after with your vassals.
Vassals which of course will consider me an exaggerated absurd prick. At least they're still free to do that.

I'm going to remove my account, also to avoid being someway sucked back into answering again.
Cheers

At least theleviathan finally read ONE tidbit, while ignoring or misconstruing all others, and rode his high horse off to his ivory tower! I have to wonder how many other things he has abandoned based on his principles... Who wants to bet this guy comes back as a lurker to see what is said?
 
Last edited: