I give up.
It seems it's plenty of people convinced that internet administrators have Gestapo powers (which is not true), and happy for it.
You don't like my face? Kill me out.
You don't like what I say? Remove every trace of my posts.
How can I discuss with someone who answers "
should LPSG moderators decide they don't like our usernames, don't like our pics, goodness, it even means if they don't like the colour we've chosen for our signature - guess what? We can be banned. You may not like that and you may not think it fair, but that's just the way it goes" ?
Sorry but you're born to be oppressed. Now that's the way it goes.
You're just a sheep, useful only as long as your pics and stories bring money to the forum's owners.
I'll be more than happy to leave this land of freedom all for yourself.
@
tallcurvycutie, sorry but you too live in your own pink and beautiful world. You keep talking about "a forest of reasons given". Perhaps you should read again (and again) the post from novice_btm, supposedly containing this 'forest':
The reason has been listed several times, and is also in the Mod Actions thread. I've also told you directly in a PM. At this point, it can only be assumed that you're publicly posting all of this to stir up things.
What, only one? And this single glorious reason being... what?
Good god, it was really that difficult to state once and for all. The SINGLE and ONLY time a reason have been 'listed' by those who know what it was has been in the Mod Actions thread (where, btw, moderators are supposed to provide information about their decisions; this about "
The moderators are under absolutely no obligation to explain the decisions they make"), and it was 'fake gender'.
The same novice_btm posts explained that couple accounts are not allowed, so THAT (and only that) is the reason. A quite poor 'forest'.
A forest of reasons which moreover, as the same novice_btm hinted, is continouosly violated by MANY.
None of them is banned.
Above all, no threads are removed.
In the end I'm still waiting to understand the riddle of horrible violations affecting those threads, especially considering that - as you say! - they were left pretty much empty.
Tallcurvycutie, you blathered about STDs and lack of verification, then the novice_btm answer came containing NONE of these, and you take it as a confirmation you were right?
Well, good for you.
You surely think I'm an offending prick, and what grieves me more is that youll never realize I'm just being rational.
And quite attached to my ideals, those ideals which Internet should foster and stand for. Not "they have any power, and no obligation to explain".