- Joined
- May 2, 2013
- Posts
- 8,453
- Media
- 26
- Likes
- 24,160
- Points
- 568
- Location
- None. I’m out.
- Sexuality
- Asexual
- Gender
- Female
I didn’t want to get philosophical on a long running pic thread (it’s in the underwear Subforum), but the discussion had turned to “what’s public?”
Many of the shots are porn. Closed sets, staged, whatever. And folks brought it up.
Sort of like the line if a tree falls in a forest logic.
so, is public a location, or is it being, or potentially being, seen?
my take as of now:
I often peel off layers during a hike, usually to wet them in a stream.
The land is public.
I do not want to be seen. I am not an exhibitionist. And I don’t want to be a voyeur.
I choose trails based on low density, and go back where my privacy is almost assured.
When hiking with an intimate partner, there’s the option of some nakedness, but not “nekkidness.”
Many of the shots are porn. Closed sets, staged, whatever. And folks brought it up.
Sort of like the line if a tree falls in a forest logic.
so, is public a location, or is it being, or potentially being, seen?
my take as of now:
I often peel off layers during a hike, usually to wet them in a stream.
The land is public.
I do not want to be seen. I am not an exhibitionist. And I don’t want to be a voyeur.
I choose trails based on low density, and go back where my privacy is almost assured.
When hiking with an intimate partner, there’s the option of some nakedness, but not “nekkidness.”