Snoozan, I don't have children of my own, but have spent lots of time tending nephews and cousins... at times for several days at a time, usually for 6 hours or so.
The things that I call irresponsible parenting are not those happen-in-a-flash occurrences. If a parent is not capable of carrying on a cell phone conversation and watch their child at the same time, guess which one I'm going to suggest that they do?
Your dog lashing out unexpectedly is NOT the same as a parent who chronically refuses to watch OR DISCIPLINE their child. The parent who says nothing as their child continually kicks the seat in front of them on an airplane. The parent who lets their child run up and down the aisles in a restaurant.
I guess she was either mortified, or indifferent. But sure, a grovelling apology would certainly have been in order, perhaps a donation.
On the test thing; it's curious how those who advocate such things (like a tougher driving test) are almost always speaking retrospectively - they already have children, or a license etc and so, are thus not affected. Would you submit to one as a condition for having another child - after all previous good practice is no guarantee of future excellence?
And, who is 'they' exactly?
Personally, I think it's nonsensical, at least on the parental thing, in part because it's a fundemental breach of human rights but few things about parenting are standard - so how can you pre-assess parental competence with a standardised test?
That's not aimed at you specifically, just punted into the ether.:smile:
I think I may be the only person here who doesn't feel righteous indignation at this incident. The truth is, toddlers are toddlers, and parents, even good parents, are going to have moments when they can't react fast enough, let alone act rationally when their child gets away from them and does something like this.
I think the problem I have, is that the child didn't "get away" from her... the child was never really WITH her. If my son is walking behind me and I can't see what he's doing, I don't consider that being "with" me.
Even excellent parents can't always keep their children within their line of sight at all times. These things happen. The fact that she didn't tell anyone-- well, who was there to tell? This incident happened after hours, so I wonder if there was anyone that was around to tell this about. If it were me, I may have been so embarrassed in the heat of the moment that I would have just walked away. I may have regretted it later, but I may not have reacted well when it happened. All parents make mistakes. Or there could have been a handful of other reasons that I would have chosen not to try to find someone and explain what happened.
I'm not sure that this incident was completely after hours. If you listen to the video with the volume up, you can hear MANY voices talking in the background. Surely there was someone there she could've reported too. Also, I'm sure that the majority of you don't even know what Union Station is, so maybe I should explain that a little. It's an old train station... still is a train station in part of, but the rest of it has been transformed and remodeled. There are restaurants and stores in there (not to mention the post office that the mother was at.) There is also "Science City" in there which is a science museum. I just have a hard time imagining that there were NO employees around somewhere.
The fact that this story made the newspaper just shows me that it must have been a slow news day or that nothing happens in Kansas City if there's not a tornado. The monks reacted appropriately. Shit happens. They know that. Why don't the rest of us? It's ironic that we're up in arms about it and the creators understand and in some ways may have welcomed such a strong example of their faith.
For those of you criticising other parents and waxing on about "the good old days," the truth is that our parents said the exact same things about other parents and how much better things were when they were kids. Are there negligent parents out there? Yes. However, some of this behavior that you're talking about is well within the realm of what good parents do. Children are overwhelming. We can't always be the perfect parents in public, or even in private.
Let me give you a personal experience. My son was bitten by the family dog when he was 9 months old. I wasn't home, but my husband was. The baby was crawling on the floor about 3 feet from my husband and went close to the dog (who had never shown any sort of aggression towards my son) and she nipped him in the face faster than it took my husband to grab the baby away. He was watching the whole time and just didn't act fast enough. Since my son was so small and the dog large, he was seriously hurt. It was a tragic accident. We put the dog down before my son came home from the hospital.
I had news vans and the newspaper show up on my doorstep the days after this happened, all wanting to know how such a tragic thing could happen and musing over what kind of parents would let this happen etc. so on and so forth. Pretty much, the same bullshit that you all are spouting about this "terrible parent" who let her kid destroy a sacred sand sculpture. This kid didn't know it wasn't appropriate to play in sand (he/she probably has a sandbox) and mom (or dad) got distracted. This happens all the time, and I bet all of you parents and caregivers out there have had that happen to you. Toddlers are fast and they can destroy something faster than it takes to blink.
I'm sorry to hear that this happened to your son! I'm a mother, I completely understand how things happen so quickly that you can't react. Shit DOES happen. This mother just seemed a bit negligent to me. Her child is three years old... she should understand that three year olds get into trouble faster than you can imagine.
You're all being ridiculous because it's a non-story and a non-issue. Kids do destructive shit all the time. All the time. And they get away from us even when we're pactically staring at them. So go ahead and get outraged, go ahead and get indignant, and go ahead and wonder about me and my parenting skills because of what happened to my kid, and thank God that nothing bad has happened to your kid and pray that it doesn't ever happen to you.
My husband and I will be wracked with guilt for the rest of our lives for something that could not have been predicted and wasn't due to some gross negligence (or at least we try to tell ourselves). People playing Monday morning quarterback over how someone else parents their child-- me or the parents of the mandala destroyer or anyone else-- are reprehensible and hypocritical to me.
If the mandala had been staffed (which is should have been) or had proper barriers installed (more than those courtesy ropes that toddlers probably don't even see), this incident probably would not have happened or mom would have reported it to the person that was there. The bottom line is, we don't know, and the writers of the story probably have half of their facts wrong. In my case, the reporters didn't even report the very simple facts correctly-- like my son's age, the time the incident happened, or the police-reported severity of the injury when it first happened. But those things they reported made a better story than what really happened.
Go parent your own children and really take a look at how imperfectly you really are, or, if you don't have kids, babysit a two year old for a week and then comment on this.
hmm.....pondering what has been said since i posted.
My opinions in this thread are observations from my profession...something i see and deal with each day, 40 hours a week...I find it to be credible, rather than...wait, what was the word i read above..."ridiculous".
I understand what you mean, and when I said the thing about the tests, I was mostly just being facetious and frustrated. I know it's not realistic. However if there WERE a test, I would take one before having more children.
I'm not saying that I'm a perfect parent. But I do pay attention to my son and his whereabouts while in public. For his safety and everyone else's.
hmm.....pondering what has been said since i posted.
My opinions in this thread are observations from my profession...something i see and deal with each day, 40 hours a week...I find it to be credible, rather than...wait, what was the word i read above..."ridiculous".
I think Harvey Danger had it right. I don't have time to dig for statistics, but isn't early parenthood practically synonymous with not going to college and a lower living standard?
Parents need to start being parents and stop being friends. When a parent takes some responsibility and shows who is in charge, the children learn respect.
I am also better off because my mother was not afraid to spank me or wash my mouth out with soap if I talked back to her. To this day, I am still petrified of the wooden spoons in her kitchen!
My mother was concerned with my safety and had my best interests in mind when she would exert parental control. I am glad she did and to this day I still respect her for it.
The little boy who ruined the mandala probably didn't know any better, but his mother sure did. With all the child abductions that take place, why in the world would you take your child to a busy place and leave them unattended? That is pure stupidity. The mother obviously needs some discipline herself.
I hope that the video keeps getting played all over the world so the mother is embarassed about her poor parenting skills. People need to learn that they have to be accountable for their actions.
As was mine, and so do I. She also allowed me to make my own mistakes, that's how I learned how to make my own judgements.
My mom let me make my own mistakes too. But she would never allow me to destroy a display case in a store, or destroy someone else's property, which is pretty much what this woman did. By not watching her son, she allowed it to happen.
I understand what you mean, and when I said the thing about the tests, I was mostly just being facetious and frustrated. I know it's not realistic. However if there WERE a test, I would take one before having more children.
Actually he was right next to her until he wandered off to the sand pit. She looked like she was in a hurry (which we all are at times, especially when we're parents) and she was expecting that he was still next to her (because that's what he was told to do and probably what he normally does) and he wandered off. She was obviously preoccupied by the way she was walking and though she should have seen him, she didn't. This is not the sign of a bad parent-- it's a sign of a busy, frazzled parent who made a bad judgement call. Now, if this is what she's always like, then yes, she's a bad parent. We just can't tell from this video. The entire incident took less than a minute. If you tell me that your child has never gotten away from you for 30 seconds or a minute, you're a better parent than I am.I think the problem I have, is that the child didn't "get away" from her... the child was never really WITH her. If my son is walking behind me and I can't see what he's doing, I don't consider that being "with" me.
I'm not sure that this incident was completely after hours. If you listen to the video with the volume up, you can hear MANY voices talking in the background. Surely there was someone there she could've reported too. Also, I'm sure that the majority of you don't even know what Union Station is, so maybe I should explain that a little. It's an old train station... still is a train station in part of, but the rest of it has been transformed and remodeled. There are restaurants and stores in there (not to mention the post office that the mother was at.) There is also "Science City" in there which is a science museum. I just have a hard time imagining that there were NO employees around somewhere.
I'm sorry to hear that this happened to your son! I'm a mother, I completely understand how things happen so quickly that you can't react. Shit DOES happen. This mother just seemed a bit negligent to me. Her child is three years old... she should understand that three year olds get into trouble faster than you can imagine.
I'm not saying that I'm a perfect parent. But I do pay attention to my son and his whereabouts while in public. For his safety and everyone else's.
I also don't think that it's a coincidence that this woman looks to be non-caucasian. I wonder if the video would have even made the news had it been an attractive young white woman.
The little boy who ruined the mandala probably didn't know any better, but his mother sure did. With all the child abductions that take place, why in the world would you take your child to a busy place and leave them unattended? That is pure stupidity. The mother obviously needs some discipline herself.
Been there, done that, still have neighbors and family members that won't talk to me because of my poor parenting skills. The funny thing is, I get most of the heat but it was my husband that was at home when my son was bitten. If this is being "held accountable" it's a fucking shame.I hope that the video keeps getting played all over the world so the mother is embarassed about her poor parenting skills. People need to learn that they have to be accountable for their actions.
I am a child and parent advocate, that is my job...so i'm certainly not intending any 'bashing' at all...I'm just sharing work stories, and my concern....I am reporting a shocking and disturbing upward increase of such incidents as I've had to deal with them at my job.
Cautioning parents is part of the job I am paid to do. I caution parents not only about child safety, but about predators...and these factors come into play when children are left unattended at my workplace.
I've been around the ole LPSG a long time, and was always known as the peaceful guy. I still am. Just clarifying my point. I'll step aside now.
Parents seem to accept increasingly less responsibility for their children as time goes on.
I see similar parental (non)behavior all the time. It really just drives me mad! My neighborhood has a tennis court and a "tot-lot" (playground) behind my house, in the common areas. I've been on my deck before, and heard one child or another screaming "help me, help me" at the top of his lungs - with mom standing there, not missing a beat gossiping with her friend. Sometimes, people will let their children play on the tennis court, and I've seen two of those moms stand there gossiping while their child(ren) ride and bounce on the net until it breaks. One mom walked over there (still not scolding the children), took a look, and said "I don't think we can fix that, we better leave before we get in trouble." The nets have been broken and fixed 3 times already this year.
Why are people like this allowed to breed?
Good question. I think they should have some standardized tests you have to take before you can conceive children. When my son (age 5) and I are out in public, he stays within 3 feet of me at all times. 90% of the time he's holding my hand, unless I'm carrying things and cannot do that. He doesn't touch things when we go into a store, he just looks. He doesn't throw fits if I say he can't have something. He's very well behaved, and I know that I made him that way. Granted, every parent has had their "moment of weakness" when it comes to children. Generally when you're at home, and not paying complete attention to what they're doing and they do something horrible. It happens to all parents. But seriously? This woman was walking several feet in front of her child from the get-go. My son NEVER walks behind me. Always next to me or in front of me.
Maybe that's just a Texas thing. Usually, when I see an inattentive parent, and the child makes something go wrong, the parent usually blames everyone else in the vicinity.
If he knocks cans off the shelf in the market, the cans should not have been stacked so high.
I'd expect that there's a correlation, though synonymous may be pushing it a little. However, even so is that a sure fire predictor of poor parenthood or is it as much cause and effect? Does being poor or ill educated make one a poor parent per se?
Inother words; what constitutes poor parenting? Is there a clear, quantifiable, predictable and reliable definition or, perhaps more relevant -predictor? Who gets to set those criteria and would any negative determination be enforced?
I suspect there is some truth in that.:biggrin1:
She looked like she was in a hurry...
I read Snoonzan's post, and being the mother of a 3 year old I can totally relate and see exactly where she is coming from. In fact, I sat there nodding my head in agreement the entire time I read it. However, I can also concur with you observation DCI want to offer this though - the two of you are referring to two completely different "types" or "classes" of parents. These parents that you speak of, DC, are not on the phone with CSR reps trying to straighten out a medical claim, or pay a bill (or any of the other million and one things a responsible parent might be doing on the phone while still trying to manage their child). No these people are are chit chatting with their girlfriends - "Hey girl, you would not believe what this ass hole did last night, let me tell you, blah, fuckity, blah...." meanwhile little Tommy is roaming around the parking lot, or tearing paper towels to shreds in the middle of an aisle somewhere . I know which "class" of parent you are referring to DC, and it INFURIATES me to witness such tolerant and uninvolved behavior from adults, much less parents.
dong20 said:I'd expect that there's a correlation, though synonymous may be pushing it a little. However, even so is that a sure fire predictor of poor parenthood or is it as much cause and effect? Does being poor or ill educated make one a poor parent per se?
Inother words; what constitutes poor parenting? Is there a clear, quantifiable, predictable and reliable definition or, perhaps more relevant -predictor? Who gets to set those criteria and would any negative determination be enforced?
I suspect there is some truth in that.:biggrin1:
No being lazy and uninterested does. I'm poor and ill educated, but I'm a damn good parent.:biggrin1: