What is your relationship failure rate?

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,678
Media
0
Likes
2,815
Points
333
Location
Greece
Open question to everyone.

I would say that I have had four to six serious relationships, in that I was fairly well embedded and things could have become "permanent". They all ended, so my "failure" rate is 100% :redface:. They weren't failures while they were happening, but the fact remains that they ended.

The point I wish to raise is that if you think about it, the vast majority of modern relationships are not permanent.

Interesting? Or am I stating the obvious?
 
Last edited:

The Dragon

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Posts
5,767
Media
0
Likes
55
Points
193
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
I do believe that most relationships have a finite life span and this could be for a range of reasons.

It can be tough buying into the "happily ever after" fairytale, hanging on it (the relationship) overlong, only to have it turn into a nightmare.
 

LadyJaneGrey

Just Browsing
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Posts
23
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
36
Location
The Tower
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
A finite life span as Dragonfly20 calls it does not necessarily mean failure.

I have had 3 unconventional relationships with men all of which ended unsatisfactorily for both parties which I consider a failure.

These were unconventional in that there was no sexual fidelity required by either side.

I was very young for the first 2 only 17-20 and I was 23 when the last ended.

I then had a conventional monogamous relationship that lasted several years and ended very badly indeed.

That too was a failure.

My reasons for entering that relationship were poor though I did not know it at the time and I only stuck with it as long as I did because of a perverse martyr complex I had going on.

I am lucky he ran away.

I am now in another monogamous relationship and have a partner who I have a great deal of faith in both as a friend and a lover.
 

EmJay

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2006
Posts
559
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
163
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Open question to everyone.

I would say that I have had four to six serious relationships, in that I was fairly well embedded and things could have become "permanent". They all ended, so my "failure" rate is 100% :redface:. They weren't failures while they were happening, but the fact remains that they ended.

The point I wish to raise is that if you think about it, the vast majority of modern relationships are not permanent.

Interesting? Or am I stating the obvious?

I probably don't really understand this question..

But..I am single..so that would mean 100% failure rate right?:smile:

I did leave behind a 12,5 year relationship and a 1 year relationship..everything else has been a few weeks to 6 mnths
 

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,678
Media
0
Likes
2,815
Points
333
Location
Greece
But..I am single..so that would mean 100% failure rate right?:smile:

Correct - I tried to make it sound a bit better by saying that previous relationships had been successful, just not permanent. :smile:

It is a strange thought though that us singles have a 100% failure rate. I don't see things in those traditional monogamy terms though.
 

nudeyorker

Admired Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Posts
22,742
Media
0
Likes
845
Points
208
Location
NYC/Honolulu
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I don't really equate the end of a relationship as a failure. Two of my relationships ended because of death. I don't think I can fault them with that. Two others ended with me leaving. In all cases I was able to take something from each experience that somehow made me stronger and/or wiser; that is not failure from my perspective. I'm currently in a LTR and short of death we are both in this for the long run but like with most things in life you can't judge the future by the past.
 
D

deleted3782

Guest
Correct - I tried to make it sound a bit better by saying that previous relationships had been successful, just not permanent. :smile:

It is a strange thought though that us singles have a 100% failure rate. I don't see things in those traditional monogamy terms though.

Even if you went back 100 years and looked at the romantic models for relationships, where boy meets girl very young, they get married, have kids, have grandkids, and die within hours of each other...there were often a number of side stories of infidelity, nonsexual relationships, and even abuse. Though the relationships were still intact, is it not recognized that they failed too?

On the other end of the spectrum, I know of a couple who met when they were kids in a small town, went to the same church, same schools, and they got married after he graduated from college. They had kids, stayed together their entire life until he died. She is now frail and miserable and content with the idea of death just to join her husband. Is that the definition of a successful relationship?

If we try to gauge relationship failure rates...what defines relationship success?

Personally, I have a terrible track record of relationships gone bad. There are one or two that ended on practical terms when one or the other had to move away from work.
 

Magnus_Phallus

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 19, 2010
Posts
860
Media
34
Likes
1,123
Points
348
Location
Global
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I only had 3 relationships that could qualify (in a conventional sense)
every time they did not really end in the traditional way.
My "relationships" kind of just faded away.
Funny thing, I stayed friends will all 3 of them,
we still see each other socially...
and on occasion we still "see" each other.

Success? Faliure? I couldnt say.
my relationships seem to mutate into something else.
Honestly I am quite comfortable with that.

judging from what I can read here, I think its
time for a paradigm shift on "relationships"

But what do I know
 

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,678
Media
0
Likes
2,815
Points
333
Location
Greece
Personally, I have a terrible track record of relationships gone bad. There are one or two that ended on practical terms when one or the other had to move away from work.

I don't disagree with anything you say. I think what has changed is the expectation, inwardly and outwardly. This leads to several interesting questions (to me) about the law covering relationships and expectations.
 

silvertriumph2

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Posts
5,678
Media
22
Likes
7,406
Points
368
Location
Eastcoast USA (NYC-Manhattan)
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male

I have to agree with
nudeyorker, for I have never thought that any of my former relationships have been failures...on either of our parts. Things change.

I have to agree with
exwhyzee also. You can't compare relationships from another age, or even today, for we don't know what made them stay together or leave. Regarding the so called stable and long lasting marriages of another time...we will never know if it was a bad marriage, what made them stay. Was it the attitudes and expectations of family or society? Religion? For the children's sake? Today, these restrictions have little effect.

My marriage and relationships have all been good, and I've always come away with good memories
and I have come away with nothing but good things from each. None are, nor will they ever be regretted. All are, and will always, remain as good friends and a certain amount of our love will
never die. If my in-laws had not been so intrusive into our marriage, I am sure she and I and our
family would still be together today.

I am now in a relationship that I hope will be the last one...
 
Last edited:

D_Doe_Ray_Mi

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
912
Media
0
Likes
144
Points
113
Sexuality
No Response
I echo silver above. i have been married twice and in many significant relationships in between and since. i have absolutely no regrets and do not consider any other than my first marriage a failure due to youth, naivety, her alcoholism and related adultery. Every relationship has contributed to my growth, life experience and learning and has made me the man I am today. I believe each relationship prepared me perfectly for the lessons awaiting me in the unknown next. Failure . . . NO WAY! Rather a rich life experience filled with love, communication, service, great sexual sharing and expression. I can honestly say that any of my exes would be pleasantly thrilled to hear from me, share about our respective lives, learnings and depth of appreciation for our live paths having been shared!!!
 

B_quietguy

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Posts
1,226
Media
0
Likes
25
Points
183
Location
Bay Area, California
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm adding voice to the chorus of people who say permanence has nothing to do with relationship success or failure.

To me, a relationship is a failure if somebody is harmed, or prevented from growing, or does not have their needs met.

If a relationship lasts 50 years or 50 days, as long as it meets each partner's needs, then it is a success.

If you end it after a while because you grew apart or realized you were not compatible, then don't call that a failure. Just call it a learning experience. You now know better what kind of person is not going to be a good partner for you. After a few learning experiences, you become adept at finding out who is a good partner for you. Then when you meet somebody who is compatible with you, you can say "Yes" to that person with greater confidence in creating a long term successful relationship.

On the flip side, just because a relationship lasts "til death do us part", does not make it a success. If one or more partners are abused, stifled, or not allowed to meet their needs for sex, intimacy, companionship, and security, then it is a failure. And a tragic failure for lasting so long.
 

curious_angel

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 29, 2010
Posts
1,052
Media
18
Likes
35
Points
283
Location
England
Verification
View
Gender
Female
I don't disagree with anything you say. I think what has changed is the expectation, inwardly and outwardly. This leads to several interesting questions (to me) about the law covering relationships and expectations.
What are the legal questions you're referring to Drifterwood?
 

Bbucko

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Posts
7,232
Media
8
Likes
326
Points
208
Location
Sunny SoFla
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
First relationship: Lasted about six months; I was too young (18) and desperate to start my own life. I learned a lot and achieved independence, but the relationship was in every sense of the word a failure.

Second relationship: lasted almost a year; I was still too young (19) and, because we never cohabited have considered downgrading this the way Pluto is no longer a planet. It ended unilaterally on his part, left me broken hearted: can't say I learned much.

Third relationship: lasted almost four years; even though I was 20, I consider this my first "adult" relationship. We shared all income and expenses, often to his detriment. The passion cooled quickly and we would up opening up the relationship after about 18 months: or love rapidly became fraternal rather than sexual. It was a messy break-up though we quickly regained a deep friendship. I learned a lot, and despite the nasty break-up consider it to have been a net-positive.

Fourth relationship was an affair that blossomed while still involved in relationship #3, eventually lasting seven years on and off. As he was completely incapable of domestication, we never cohabited even once we both were free of other entanglements. For years we'd sneak in and out of each other's lives until he disappeared; I considered him the one that got away. We met up toward the end of his too-short life but by then the passion was gone. Much as I loved him, I'd say that one was a failure.

Fifth relationship: lasted just over four years. He was the only son of a pair of wealthy Venezuelans. He taught me international travel and a broader outlook. Despite the fact that we quarreled constantly, I learned a tremendous amount, and when it was (finally!) over, we became best friends. I learned a lot from him.

Sixth relationship moved me to Paris to live with him. I learned acres and boatloads and he remains the high point of my existence. Had he not died, I'd still be living a highly combative and (probably) toxic relationship with him, as I loved him immoderately. Burying him remains the low point in my existence.

Seventh relationship was "coming home", as we grew up 18 months apart and within a half-mile of each other. It lasted nine years, though it should have ended at five. The net result was so toxic, I was lucky to escape alive.

The last two were brief and completely toxic. They are why I choose to live alone.
 

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,678
Media
0
Likes
2,815
Points
333
Location
Greece
What are the legal questions you're referring to Drifterwood?

Very interesting points made by everyone. I didn't mean the thread title to be so controversial; perhaps it shows how different a question can be dependent upon the underlying moral norm of the issue. Within my own terms, I would say that only 2 of my relationships were failures.

To answer your question, Curious, we seem to have a societal construct lag between what people do, want to do and need to do to be happy and how society wraps up relationships formally.

The process of ending a formal relationship is punitive emotionally and financially to everyone. This hardly allows the personal growth that people are talking about from their own series of relationships. In fact quite the opposite, it coerces people to remain in unfulfillment.

PS - very Helga :smile:

PPS - having just read Bb's post, and Nudie's before, I have to say that I find the way Gay men have relationships, albeit given the many problems that society dumps on them, more representative of how men would prefer to live their lives, than the formal monogamous matrimony that is the traditional lot of the Str8 man. Perhaps some married str8 men hate them for that freedom, for better or for worse.
 
Last edited: