What length counts as well hung?

[TinyPrincess]

http://www.lpsg.org/158761-what-girth-counts-well-hung.html

 

[Mr Ed in Mass]

14 13/17

 

[Gaydane]

Anything from 7 and above is hung.
invisible-2 humiliated
2-3 babydick
3-4 tiny
4-5 small
5-5,5 small to average
5,65-6,5 average
6,5-7 a little above average
7-7½ big
7½-8 very big
8-8½ very hung
8½-9 huge
9-10 monster
10+ born as a pornstar

 

[the_reverend]

http://www.lpsg.org/158761-what-girth-counts-well-hung.html

good to know there's as much uncertainty and argument for that question as well. lol!

 

[canadianwhiskey]

6.75 NBPEL / 7.25 BPEL

 

[BigDee3]

I think 8 is well hung.

 

[mazrus]

7 looks exactly the same as 6, 8 only does it with girth to back it up, you're not looking at a hung skinny dick until 9 imo, but voting 8. This was all very important

 

[Jeff Powers]

I went with 7" on my vote.

 

[BeauxEast]

I found this online.

 

[554279]

I am going with 100cm or 36 inches. Go big or go home. Yeah I am hung like a mosquito based on that criteria...fuck it gimme some of that SPH action I ain't afraid

 

[977618]

I found this online.
View attachment 542763

that looks exactly right

 

[BigDee3]

I found this online.
View attachment 542763

Perfect

 

[notN2pussy]

I think past 7 they are very lucky

 

[84879]

Anything from 7 and above is hung.
invisible-2 humiliated
2-3 babydick
3-4 tiny
4-5 small
5-5,5 small to average
5,65-6,5 average
6,5-7 a little above average
7-7½ big
7½-8 very big
8-8½ very hung
8½-9 huge
9-10 monster
10+ born as a pornstar

Only there are no pornstars 10+. They are as real as the Loch Ness monster. Most pornstars are around 7 in and use camera tricks or are really short to exaggerate the size

 

[Ocine]

I found this online.
View attachment 542763

I like in wich category i fall here, since its BP, but I still dont find me "that big"

 

[twoton]

I think Average is a little smaller than the ruler shows. Isn't avg 5.1" to 5.3"?

 

[TexanStar]

Depends entirely on the woman you're dating (straight dude perspective).

 

[lapdog2001]

I found this online.
View attachment 542763

According to the medical definition of micropenis, that scale has to move to the left 1/2 inch!
Below average is really anything smaller than 4.7, so that portion is also way off.

 

[Serpentlike]

According to the medical definition of micropenis, that scale has to move to the left 1/2 inch!
Below average is really anything smaller than 4.7, so that portion is also way off.

Great! That makes me massive!

 

[Nosuportneeded]

I think Average is a little smaller than the ruler shows. Isn't avg 5.1" to 5.3"?

I mean who the fuck really knows?

So many question marks and skews:

Bp/nbp? The measurer could be off. The erection could be weak. The volunteers could be volunteering because they are bigger. Pool could be irregular.

And what pool do you compare with?
World wide and all ages?
Something closer to your demographic?

Finally, are you measuring in the same fashion as they did in the study? Did you jelq for an hour first?
Are you wearing a cockring? Are you pushing the ruler through your skin? Is your erection level the same as the guys who were in the study?

I think I am more likely to volunteer for a study than a below average individual, where as big guys would be chomping at the bit.

When I measure I make sure my dick is maxed out and the ruler is pushed in nice and snug. In a study, I'd say the erection level may not be as good and the measurer will not measure with goal of getting the biggest number.

Pools of different demographics have produced varying numbers, compounding the issue more.

I would knock .25" off of my self-measured numbers to achieve consistency with a study where men were measured by someone else.

Then again, these men must volunteer, and I am fairly certain that bigger guys will skew the results to the bigger side because they are more likely to volunteer.

Whew.