Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Show Off' started by B_veedubb, Oct 1, 2009.
This long fella arrived in my email. Guestimates? :scratchchin:
Realistically, he is legitimately in the 7-8.5" length range (7 at the shortest point to possibly 8.5 at the longest point) with about 5.5-6.5" girth.
Definitely not 10+ inches. :smile:
He has really underdeveloped thighs, and they create an optical illusion that makes him look larger. Judging by other things in the pic, such as the distance between his navel and the base of his cock, he's about 8".
ill say 9
That's Mr Slammer from RudeJam and he's one of the biggest guys on that site. He's much bigger than 7"... I've got 9 vids of him that tell a very different story.
i reckon a legit 9" maybe 9.5" pubic pushed fully hard??
big enough to fuck up a pussy or ass
You might be right, Mule, but is it not difficult to accurately judge these distances from the pic's perspective?
I take it that means 'much bigger than 7" ', cardifdillon?
I can't tell, which is why I asked the question..hoping for posters with a good eye. To me it just looks a helluva long. I'd guess, and that's all it would be, possibly, 9 or 10 :smile:
Well he has a strong upward curve, so I know from personal experience that this is the worst type of curve to have for top side measurements only. The bottom side is actually the longest side and will produce the OMG measurements, not the top side.
So basically you're only allowed to look at the "U" shaped distance from his pubic bone to the tip of his penis as his "length" measurement, when in reality the underside of his cock is a hell of a lot longer than the topside is.
The distance between my the base of my penis and my navel is well over 10" so that reference can be subjective as well
Yes, and that's just my best guess. He could be close to 9". He is definitely not 11", 12" or 13" as some have suggested.
Yeah I'd go about 8 or 8.25
have you got a complete picture set?
Or some videos?