What should JQBlonde's next brilliant and famous subject heading be?

What should JQBlonde's next brilliant and famous subject heading be?

  • Why did Democrats kill so many Jews during the holocaust?

    Votes: 5 14.7%
  • The positive side of global catastrophe: what the libtard media won't tell you!

    Votes: 2 5.9%
  • Why I'm right and every educated person in the world is wrong. Stated brilliantly and famously!

    Votes: 15 44.1%
  • Rosie O'Donnel: anti-christ? What every penis enthusiast should know before the rapture.

    Votes: 7 20.6%
  • Dangerous flower shortage could impede Iranians' plans to greet an invading army as liberators.

    Votes: 5 14.7%

  • Total voters
    34

Ethyl

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Posts
5,194
Media
19
Likes
1,707
Points
333
Location
Philadelphia (Pennsylvania, United States)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
The original with Edward Woodward (Sexy man if ever I saw one) was quite good. The remake a few years ago was pathetic.

Agreed. Goes to show that a low budget flick can be effectively eerie with the proper cast, script, and direction. The remake was abysmally boring.
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
93
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
The next brilliant and famous subject heading:

Why do those left-wingers lie and say Rove violated the Hatch Act?
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
93
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
Ah, Beaker, you are wise indeed.

Perhaps the next brilliant and famous subject heading will be

"My retraction - I finally realize, and admit, that Bush lied. He misunderestimated how hard NIC160IQ has to work to put food on his family."
 

B_spiker067

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2006
Posts
2,163
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Well, it seems obvious that JQB has not converted anyone to his opinion in any thread in which he has been a significant contributor (Though I've only read maybe 30% of his posts... maybe less). As a matter of fact he has more effectively driven people in the opposite direction of the belief it would seem he is interested in fostering.

JQB, What exactly are you trying to accomplish?
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
51
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Well, it seems obvious that JQB has not converted anyone to his opinion in any thread in which he has been a significant contributor (Though I've only read maybe 30% of his posts... maybe less). As a matter of fact he has more effectively driven people in the opposite direction of the belief it would seem he is interested in fostering.

JQB, What exactly are you trying to accomplish?


Shhhhh! He's really a recruiter for us moonbats.
 

B_NineInchCock_160IQ

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Posts
6,196
Media
0
Likes
40
Points
183
Location
where the sun never sets
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I think a great example of a straw man argument is to :

1. Claim a certain poster is a global warming denier;
2. Proceed to debate THAT position, much much easier to do than the person's actual position ;
3. Then calim victory when that position is defeated.

Idn't that right <cough> 160IQ < derisive chortle> ??

So, in other words you are voting for "I'm not a science denier and I have defensible positions. no, really, I do. really!"

yeah, that's a good one. Pretty funny.
 

B_NineInchCock_160IQ

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Posts
6,196
Media
0
Likes
40
Points
183
Location
where the sun never sets
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I thought we'd decided that he didn't deny GW was an issue, but debated how much of an issue, and suggested we do nothing about it since we'd failed at fixing everything else so there was little to no point in spending our time/money in attempting to fix this since based on history, it would be for nothing

(That was my rough understanding of it, either way its still a fucked up way of looking at things)

It's difficult to tell with JQ because he so frequently contradicts himself when he is cutting and pasting from other people's biased and partisan arguments. Then he can barely contain his absolute derision for anyone he sees as an evil liberal, and so whilst spewing forth his vitriolic and infantile remarks on everything from global warming to the war in Iraq he often appears to be the insane ranting cuntard that to his core I'm sure he really is. Then later in an attempt to regain at least a smidgen of credibility he backtracks and stakes a claim on a position that is actually close to being reasonable, while denying his true feelings on the issue that could have been inferred by his earlier insults, snide remarks, and cut & paste talking points rhetoric. Then when people make reference to his inferred position he brings up his stated position, since the two are often different, and attacks this person for making the very sound and logical inference.
 

B_big dirigible

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Posts
2,672
Media
0
Likes
12
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
To avoid being accused of making straw-man arguments, the most effective tactic is probably to stop making them. That condition isn't sufficient, but it'd be a very good place to start.

However, as the straw-man format is the real core of public discourse - which acute observers have no doubt noticed consists mainly of two sides eternally talking past each other, and doing it loudly - don't expect it to go away any time soon, neither in the real world nor here in the LPSG peanut gallery.
 

B_NineInchCock_160IQ

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Posts
6,196
Media
0
Likes
40
Points
183
Location
where the sun never sets
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
As a matter of fact he has more effectively driven people in the opposite direction of the belief it would seem he is interested in fostering.

I think you're absolutely right. If someone were to come here and state a conservative opinion with even a modicum of intelligence, humanity, and reason... more often than not in this very liberal crowd (a handful of posters excepted) I would end up on their side of the argument.

But JQ is niether intelligent nor reasonable. But... that's what makes his posts funny. He is a master at the fine art of self-parody. Or just a stupid troll.

Those who disagree with him don't always have their facts 100% in order and don't always make the soundest of arguments, but they're also not completely deranged. If one sensible person in the middle decides to take issue with one side of the other, it's easy to choose JQ's side to criticize.
 

B_NineInchCock_160IQ

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Posts
6,196
Media
0
Likes
40
Points
183
Location
where the sun never sets
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
To avoid being accused of making straw-man arguments, the most effective tactic is probably to stop making them. That condition isn't sufficient, but it'd be a very good place to start.

However, as the straw-man format is the real core of public discourse - which acute observers have no doubt noticed consists mainly of two sides eternally talking past each other, and doing it loudly - don't expect it to go away any time soon, neither in the real world nor here in the LPSG peanut gallery.

can we at least come up with a few different metaphors, then?