What size would you consider hung? (Flaccid and erect)

n3150n

Experimental Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 23, 2013
Posts
72
Media
20
Likes
16
Points
143
Location
UK
Verification
View
Gender
Male
But in the context of this thread, you would surely consider someone "hung" if their flaccid size was above a certain figure? Agreed that it's irrelevant for sex, but probably worth something for ego/confidence boosting and getting attention.

Personally I'm a grower, so flaccid size in most situations wouldn't be a flattering measurement.
 
8

878863

Guest
Who cares about flaccid size? But to be considered "hung," my opinion is a legitimate 7.5 inches long. I know this is the internet and LPSG, but true 7.5+ inch dicks are actually a lot more rare than random anonymous people on the internet would have you believe.
 

juanXX

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 27, 2013
Posts
7,980
Media
373
Likes
49,382
Points
483
Location
Spain
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
You're right.
The flaccid size is irrelevant for sex...ual intercourse. But useful for the own ego/confidence. Also to getting attention in public spaces, private parties, etc to boosting then the curiosity among size lovers.

Some figures.
A 6.5 lenght is in the upper quintile (bigger than 81.7% of people)
A 4 inches flaccid also is in the upper quintile (bigger than 82.8% of people)
And a circunference of 5.2 inches is again in the upper quintile (bigger than 83.5% of people)

All this according the distributions of
How Long is My Schlong?
Others comparators requieres bigger sizes to be considered hung
 

juanXX

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 27, 2013
Posts
7,980
Media
373
Likes
49,382
Points
483
Location
Spain
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
Who cares about flaccid size? But to be considered "hung," my opinion is a legitimate 7.5 inches long. I know this is the internet and LPSG, but true 7.5+ inch dicks are actually a lot more rare than random anonymous people on the internet would have you believe.
Certainly "hung"
According the same data,
Erect 7.5 is bigger than 98.27% of people
In a room of 1000 guys, 17 should be large
 

amadordelsexo

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Posts
1,645
Media
41
Likes
101
Points
133
Location
currently valencia venezuela
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
CERTAINLY FLACCID DICK IS NOT IMPORTANT FOR SEX.
BUT ITS THE FIRST LOOK AND NORMAL DICK CONDITION.
IT GIVE AN IDEA OF HOW IT WOULD LOOK LATER IN RIGID CONDITION.
AS FINALY SMALL,HUGE ,MONSTER ECT.
IS AS THE INTRODUCING DICK SIZE CARD.
WE COULD SAY THAT A FLACCID DICK LESS THAN 5 x 5 INCHES IS AN SMALL DICK, DUE IN RIGID CONDITION,
SCARCELY COULD REACH 6,5 INNCHES WHEN RIGID.
THINK WOULD BE WEIRD A FLACCID DICK 5 INCHES AND RIGID LESS THAN 6.
THINK ONLY FOR THOSE THIN FLACCID DICK.
So COULD EXIST A GROW COMBINATION A LITLLE THICKER AND A LITLLE IN LENGHT
 

n3150n

Experimental Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 23, 2013
Posts
72
Media
20
Likes
16
Points
143
Location
UK
Verification
View
Gender
Male
No flaccid size is not an indicator of erect size - that may be true in your own experience, but my range is much larger. I'm a good 7"+ erect, but can honestly be 1-2" flaccid after I've been doing something non-sexual for an extended period. I'm circumcised but at that point my skin actually starts to bunch up like a foreskin around and over the head. Can look ridiculously tiny!
 

Evenflow618

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Posts
1,398
Media
4
Likes
2,076
Points
208
Location
CA
Gender
Male
I believe 6.25 inches is hung. Most chicks are 5.5 inches deep. You also need a girth of 5 inches too. I have seen a dildo 6.25 inches long and 5 inch girth. I was impressed with such a size to consider that hung.
 
8

878863

Guest
I have to disagree with everyone who is saying 6.5" is hung. 6.5" dicks are well within the normal limits of penis size. While it might feel nice to be inclusive in threads like this, terms like "hung" and "huge" are meant to be exclusionary identifiers of statistical outliers, are they not? Otherwise, why even bother with them? "Above average" is not a term to be ashamed of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Giovanni

peacenlove84

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Posts
539
Media
0
Likes
147
Points
288
Location
California (United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
"Hung" is really just a word that people with different experiences have colored differently. If you want accuracy in your assessment, look at the statistics -- 5.5 is *about* the statistical average, if I remember correctly. If you're 1-2 inches bigger than that, you probably qualify as "above average" or "big" and have probably heard comments from sex partners similar to that. Then beyond that is probably deserving of a term like "huge" or "massive." Everybody relates to a word like "hung" differently. At the end of the day, adjectives are subjective whereas numbers aren't.
 

AlexDB9

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Posts
1,059
Media
18
Likes
401
Points
268
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Due to the dissonance in size claims and real-world perception re: how many inches someone has, it's hard to establish a universal base line. One person's 7 inches may look quite different than the 7 inches I see as most people don't measure every cock they see. That said, 7+ REAL inches is big, 8+ is huge, 9+ is gigantic and good luck finding one. Girth is just as much of a factor. A fat 7" will give you a lot more stretch than an 8" pencil dick.

Flaccid size isn't much of a predictor. Catch me in cold weather and I might be dismissed as small.

As an aside, almost every guy I've met who claimed 9" was my size or smaller.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Giovanni

Exbiker

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Posts
3,182
Media
10
Likes
2,848
Points
258
Location
Ascot (Windsor and Maidenhead, England)
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I think 8" hard is hung.

Girth is a factor, agreed. I'll be more likely to use 'hung' to describe a thicker dick.

I've noticed the flaccid state can have little relation to the erect size. But I'd probably be thinking "big" at say 4.5 soft or more ...

Or ... "a bit bigger than me", in other words :wink: