What woman prefers smaller penis?
- Thread starter Nrets
- Start date
Belly_Dancer
Experimental Member
He first told me he was 6" around, and 7" long (measured correctly, from the top side).
But when we met, I discovered the truth...he got the girth right (although he's a bit wider than 6" at the base), but he underestimated his length.
Even not fully erect, I can easily place both hands along his shaft, with room to spare, and not including the head. I just put my hands around a ruler (I do not have small hands) and I'd say he is 8" long.
But it's actually fortunate that I didn't know that up front...I wouldn't have thought I could take him (I have, or thought I had, a somewhat short vagina...)
It turns out, however, that although I can't take his full length at first, when fully aroused, I can. And I've already rhapsodized about what his girth does to me. :biggrin2:
Could I take longer? I really think not. Some positions are downright painful when he penetrates all the way.
Could I take thicker? Physiologically, probably. Would I prefer to? No. The rings of muscle around the entrance of my vagina are so tight that they become bruised from stretching even after just a few encounters with AW. It's a different kind of soreness...not rubbed raw, but a deeper ache.
I love it. :wink:
But I would not want it to be any more intense.
We like to sleep in various ways, but one of the things he likes to do is put 2 fingers in my pussy while I'm sleeping, and start stimulating me. Apparently, I get wet when I'm not even conscious (I am a heavy sleeper).
But after this last week together, his insertion of 2 fingers was uncomfortable enough that I couldn't sleep with them there. So, I can get off on his cock when highly aroused, but when I'm that sore, I can't even relax w/2 fingers. I have plenty of cock now, thank you very much. :biggrin1:
Those are my girlfriend's thoughts exactly! She can't really take much more length than 6.5", but she needs a girth over 5.5" around even if it bruises her muscles (which she likes afterward).
silverheart
Just Browsing
I read that more attractive women demand more in size. There was a study and the women who rated themself as very attractive were the most concerned about penis size. I think for most women, they can't afford to be so choosy as there are so many other attributes that could sustain a relationship. It might be the last thing of importance on their list after personality and all that but it still matters some what.
Belly_Dancer
Experimental Member
Oops...didn't see this post before. He's an LPSG member; here's a link to his gallery:
Artfulwilly
The pics don't quite do it justice, IMO...but I am a bit biased. :wink:
silverheart
Just Browsing
This is interesting because it's a self-inventory-- women who consider themselves attractive, not women who others judge to be attractive scientifically. I would argue that women who consider themselves attractive probably depend on their physical attributes more and pay attention to them more-- and, correspondingly, value the physical (penis size) more in their partners also.
Dude, don't tie yourself up in knots over this. Having a small or average-sized dick is not deadly to your chances. Having no self-confidence is. Work with what you're given. Be diligent about always improving your technique, your foreplay, your mood-setting and massages and the occasional well-timed "nice gesture" -- you'll be fine, and you'll find the right kind of woman. You will run into size queens. If you do, and that's the foremost thing on their minds, move on to someone who is looking for something else first. There are plenty of attractive women out there.
Kevin
Kevin
Quote:
Originally Posted by ironspade![]()
I read that more attractive women demand more in size. There was a study and the women who rated themself as very attractive were the most concerned about penis size. I think for most women, they can't afford to be so choosy as there are so many other attributes that could sustain a relationship. It might be the last thing of importance on their list after personality and all that but it still matters some what
What Snoozan says about women who consider themselves attractive: with the additional thought that they are probably more familiar, comfortable and relaxed about their bodies and who they are; in my opinion means that they are more comfortable with their sexuality, are more likely to be easily aroused by their own thoughts and actions as well as by a partner and therefore can be excited by and confident in her ability to enjoy a larger penis and she will be more "open" to an encounter. Excitement, arousal and confidence lead to a fully engorged, wet vagina capable of handling larger girths and lengths,
Originally Posted by ironspade
I read that more attractive women demand more in size. There was a study and the women who rated themself as very attractive were the most concerned about penis size. I think for most women, they can't afford to be so choosy as there are so many other attributes that could sustain a relationship. It might be the last thing of importance on their list after personality and all that but it still matters some what
What Snoozan says about women who consider themselves attractive: with the additional thought that they are probably more familiar, comfortable and relaxed about their bodies and who they are; in my opinion means that they are more comfortable with their sexuality, are more likely to be easily aroused by their own thoughts and actions as well as by a partner and therefore can be excited by and confident in her ability to enjoy a larger penis and she will be more "open" to an encounter. Excitement, arousal and confidence lead to a fully engorged, wet vagina capable of handling larger girths and lengths,
My wife has stated that she would prefer a "pencil" penis and smaller is better. It has taken a lot of effort and practice on her part to get to where she can take nearly half of me without getting totally sore, luckily she is willing to work more at dilating to see if she can accommodate all of my penis.
Oooh, well picked up on; most research of this nature is often misunderstood for this very reason. Superficial people often rate themselves highly and because they are superficial only value things that they perceive as being bigger, better of more expensive
Deb-I know there allot of females who prefer the average sized guys, and I will grant you a guy needs more just a big one, to attract a female, but I tell as a well hung guy-I really hate the size don't matter thing. Not only do get off on Size Queen Female, but prefer them. Like a large bust, long legs, a nice shaped rear, brains and beauty, kind eyes and a kind heart, I prefer this over the other choices. You -not saying you personally but only in general want annoy a big cocked stud-bring the size don't thing and I tell it will piss him off a bit. A guy can't being born hunky or considered sexy by women and a few guys-I've had both sexes get crushes on me, nor can a guy help tall,handsome, intelligent. I feel having a big ones an asset-bottom line. Proud of it and that’s the way I always feel about this subject you’ll my post always be in favor of that thinking. Just the way I am.
I’m tall around 6 feet. Dark haired, dark eyes. Average build-around 2 pounds. I guess that’s average. I’m hornier than a teenager and hung a porn star.I know there are more guys average sized than me,but hello-God made all unique.
I’m tall around 6 feet. Dark haired, dark eyes. Average build-around 2 pounds. I guess that’s average. I’m hornier than a teenager and hung a porn star.I know there are more guys average sized than me,but hello-God made all unique.
If you go by stastistics on LPSG due to the very nature of the site the great majority of women (90% +) will say SIZE MATTERS, If you go by national averages most polls say 65%-70% of women say Size Matters but they never take into account that SIZE is a relative issue. What is Big to someone may not be considered big to another.
Also Thickness is more important to women than length is but the opposite is true when men are questioned.
:banana:
HORSE
Also Thickness is more important to women than length is but the opposite is true when men are questioned.
:banana:
HORSE
Monique Gabrielle has stated for the record that her ideal length is 5" and won't even consider anyone much more than 6"
Go figure.
Go figure.
I'm with Deb on this one. Yes, size matters - but not at the expense of everything else.
Am I more turned on and sexually satisfied with a big guy than an average guy everything else equal? Yes, I am.
Part physical. If you're much shorter than 7.5-8 you won't hit those spots in me that make my knees wobble afterwards since it makes me come so hard my whole lower body contracts. If you're much thinner than 5.5 around you won't put enough pressure on those areas that are sensitive to touch and get off on feeling the right combination of friction, slip and weight move over them.
Part mental. It feels good to have to use both hands to cover you. I like not being able to take it all to the root when I put my mouth around it. It's also that visual component of seeing the outline against the stomach and the thighs - the thought that slips through the head "damn, that's big", the tingle in the stomach, the anticipation of what it will feel like when it enters.
Does this mean I'll turn down guys that are less than what I prefer sizewise? No. But if I have a choice I'll go with my preference.
I've spent 12 years in a relationship with a guy that is not much more than a notch above average in both length and girth. Was sex good? Yes, he was (and is) a fantastic lover in his own right as he's got skills and a tongue that is beyond divine. Did I get that same physical sensation as I get with a bigger guy? No. Did that cause it to end? Hell no!
Were we compatible in all the other aspects that are important - being able to talk, sharing goals, humor, intelligence, feeling a closeness? Yes, mostly - but developed in different directions over the years. And that - not the size thing is what caused us to go different ways.
Am I more turned on and sexually satisfied with a big guy than an average guy everything else equal? Yes, I am.
Part physical. If you're much shorter than 7.5-8 you won't hit those spots in me that make my knees wobble afterwards since it makes me come so hard my whole lower body contracts. If you're much thinner than 5.5 around you won't put enough pressure on those areas that are sensitive to touch and get off on feeling the right combination of friction, slip and weight move over them.
Part mental. It feels good to have to use both hands to cover you. I like not being able to take it all to the root when I put my mouth around it. It's also that visual component of seeing the outline against the stomach and the thighs - the thought that slips through the head "damn, that's big", the tingle in the stomach, the anticipation of what it will feel like when it enters.
Does this mean I'll turn down guys that are less than what I prefer sizewise? No. But if I have a choice I'll go with my preference.
I've spent 12 years in a relationship with a guy that is not much more than a notch above average in both length and girth. Was sex good? Yes, he was (and is) a fantastic lover in his own right as he's got skills and a tongue that is beyond divine. Did I get that same physical sensation as I get with a bigger guy? No. Did that cause it to end? Hell no!
Were we compatible in all the other aspects that are important - being able to talk, sharing goals, humor, intelligence, feeling a closeness? Yes, mostly - but developed in different directions over the years. And that - not the size thing is what caused us to go different ways.
Similar threads
