What would be considered a true monster cock?

[cocksuker]

Anything above 7"

 

[1502452]

I think 8" non-bone pressed would start the monster category. That's just an unnecessary amount of penis.

 

[teddybaerli1]

Well, let me show you some monter dicks which deserve that term:

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[teddybaerli1]

 

[Ladavid9]

worldwide - a 7.0 x 5.5 would be a monster

That's a matter of opinion. Seven inches is great but no where near a monster as far as I'm concerned.

 

[693987]

With real inches/knowing what an inch actually is and not playing up camera angles/etc? 7" length or more. 6" girth or more.

 

[sizehungry]

View attachment 3037461

FUCK !! Just love to deep throat that . All the way .

 

[LOUIS]

View attachment 3037491

That is a monster cock, for sure !

 

[teddybaerli1]

FUCK !! Just love to deep throat that . All the way .

And do you think you would be able to handle that?

 

[Isuckmonstercocks]

Was wondering how others would classify what makes a cock truly monstrous. Is it based on it's length, girth or a combination of the two? I was personally thinking a true monster cock would be where your length and girth are both in the top 1%, so around 7.75"+ in length and 6"+ in thickness.

I'm just a tad over 8" bone pressed but "only" 5.5" in thickness, which puts me well within the top 1% for length but 10% for thickness. I have a big cock but not a monster cock.

What are your opinions on this?

I still love your cock based on its size