What would be considered a true monster cock?

[Nosuportneeded]

Too big to suck? It's a function of girth. It depends on the sucker too. I've gotten the comment that I'm difficult to suck, so a true 7" girth would probably eliminate most and 6.5" is going to be iffy many times. It also depends on how you define suck. Just sucking the head is kind of a stretch (no pun).

Look at Shane diesel. Rare for him to get sucked past the head. He's 6.5"-7" girth.

Big girth at the glans is really what makes it tough. If you taper to big girth at mid shaft or lower, it is easier to suck and or throat.

 

[Shrike]

if you see one you know it

 

[kloffus2000]

A monster cock ought to be a very rare thing. I think setting the bar for monster cocks at 1% is far too low. That is say 1000 in a town with an adult male population of 100.000. So not so rare. My scale goes average between 5 and 6.5 big 6.6 to about 7.5 and very big or huge 7.5 to 8.25. Monster begins after that. 8.24 is three standard deviations above average and 99.8% of penises will be shorter than this. Likewise for girth I think penises thicker than three standard deviations above the average of 4.67 would qualify as monsters i.e. over 6.29 in girth. But of course a true monster cock ought to be not only long but thick as well, so one is looking ( for a very long time of course!) for a cock which is over 8.5 long and about 7 inches in girth. Even then 0.2% means 200 in 100.000. So one has a reasonable chance of seeing such a monster in a lifetime of cruising.

 

[Heat]

It's like the definition of pornography -- You know it when you see it.

 

[kloffus2000]

At setting the bar for a freakish or really monster cock at 0.2% maybe I was being too modest . If we say 0.1% we are really getting into the region of rare - but still 1 man in 1000. What about 0.01% or 1 man in 10,000. Not rare enough? Say 1 in 100.000. Even then there should be one in your town of some 300,000 population. Is that rare enough to count as monster? Four standard deviation above mean is 9.90 inches long and 6.83 inches in girth. I think I have seen cocks this big in porn sites that specialize in monsters. They do exist though I have never met on in my life.

 

[GorillaHorse]

I think you knew this already, your big fat dick is exceptionally thick.

I never thought of my own cock as a monster though. I can see people being scared by it but it is pretty normal to me. It does get to almost 7" girth at the base though. Pretty scary I suppose.

 

[sangheili90]

A monster cock ought to be a very rare thing. I think setting the bar for monster cocks at 1% is far too low. That is say 1000 in a town with an adult male population of 100.000. So not so rare. My scale goes average between 5 and 6.5 big 6.6 to about 7.5 and very big or huge 7.5 to 8.25. Monster begins after that. 8.24 is three standard deviations above average and 99.8% of penises will be shorter than this. Likewise for girth I think penises thicker than three standard deviations above the average of 4.67 would qualify as monsters i.e. over 6.29 in girth. But of course a true monster cock ought to be not only long but thick as well, so one is looking ( for a very long time of course!) for a cock which is over 8.5 long and about 7 inches in girth. Even then 0.2% means 200 in 100.000. So one has a reasonable chance of seeing such a monster in a lifetime of cruising.

You forget that to be a monster cock would be at the top 1% for both length and girth. Assuming that neither length or girth are correlated that is extremely rare to have both.

 

[sangheili90]

I never thought of my own cock as a monster though. I can see people being scared by it but it is pretty normal to me. It does get to almost 7" girth at the base though. Pretty scary I suppose.

That's because you are used to seeing it, when you become accustomed to being exposed to something that is in fact an outlier it is seemingly normal to you.

 

[GorillaHorse]

You forget that to be a monster cock would be at the top 1% for both length and girth. Assuming that neither length or girth are correlated that is extremely rare to have both.

I was going to say the same thing. They are definitely correlated but it is hard to say how strong the correlation is.

6.5" and higher girth is 1/2500
Add 8"+ length to that and I would say 1/50000 so 20x as rare even though 8"+ is about 1/300

So 8x6.5 or bigger and you're probably the biggest in a town of 100,000

That's because you are used to seeing it, when you become accustomed to being exposed to something that is in fact an outlier it is seemingly normal to you.

The funny thing is that if I look at one of my pics as if it is someone elses, it seems a lot bigger. It is hard to look at my pics like that, but it is easier to do if I haven't looked at them in awhile.

 

[slimgurl]

Monster? I'd say 10+ long and 6"girth or more. 8 and 9 inchers are just really big dicks. Shorter and really thick are fun to suck on

 

[Standard Deviant]

Monster? I'd say 10+ long and 6"girth or more. 8 and 9 inchers are just really big dicks. Shorter and really thick are fun to suck on

Just suck on? Not suck off?

 

[MrHUGE1n]

You forget that to be a monster cock would be at the top 1% for both length and girth. Assuming that neither length or girth are correlated that is extremely rare to have both.

I do and have GIFS and videos to prove

 

[sangheili90]

I was going to say the same thing. They are definitely correlated but it is hard to say how strong the correlation is.

6.5" and higher girth is 1/2500
Add 8"+ length to that and I would say 1/50000 so 20x as rare even though 8"+ is about 1/300

So 8x6.5 or bigger and you're probably the biggest in a town of 100,000



The funny thing is that if I look at one of my pics as if it is someone elses, it seems a lot bigger. It is hard to look at my pics like that, but it is easier to do if I haven't looked at them in awhile.

I'm actually the same way. When I look at my erect cock it just seems normal but when I take my phone out and look at the screen for a shot I'm about to take it looks way bigger from that.

 

[At.your.cervix]

It's like the definition of pornography -- You know it when you see it.

Or, you know it when you feel it.

 

[Heat]

Or, you know it when you feel it.

I stand corrected.

 

[sangheili90]

In regards to the original post, away from porn and this site, in the real world, you have a massive uncut monster cock, especially because it's so vascular and you have big nuts. It looks like it gets super hard, you're uncut, and all those crazy veins make your cock look truly monstrous.

I'd need a bit more thickness to be a true pussy stretcher.

 

[Alexanderson13]

Couldn't fit in two girls is that a monster?

 

[Nosuportneeded]

Couldn't fit in two girls is that a monster?

That alone doesn't class you as a monster. Also couldn't fit, or couldn't fit all the way?

In the pics, you look quite large, but just shy of monster status to me

 

[sangheili90]

Couldn't fit in two girls is that a monster?

You really aren't supposed to take this thread so seriously. I'd say if a girl struggles with your penis in any way you are most likely a monster in the real world.

 

[Nosuportneeded]

Couldn't fit in two girls is that a monster?

You really aren't supposed to take this thread so seriously. I'd say if a girl struggles with your penis in any way you are most likely a monster in the real world.

Women. The women here prefer the term women