B_Think_Kink
Sexy Member
I'd have to say a homosexual, they are a minority that gets some of the most hard discrimination.
In Europe, I believe those who have it hardest are the French, black, lesbian, jewish short women forced to live in Germany and Austria.
Hey jason_els,
I really liked your comments to ballsaplenty2156 and I think you alluded to some of the same sentiments I had in my previous post concerning this whole issue. It all really just boils down to some peoples in-ability to empathize with this issue and struggle. Not to single him out in any negative way or anything, but ballsaplenty2156 response is what is typically being trumpeted and espoused by many young white males in my generation or younger. Since most of them have no family or close friends that had to endure any of the things being spoken about here, it is easy to dismiss the concerns and frustrations of people like me as baseless outdated nagging. And you dont want to know how many times the issue of this immigrant group was able to succeed, why cant yours? has been tossed about as if it proves anything. THEY WERE NEVER ENSLAVED BY THE DOMINANT RACE IN THIS COUNTRY FOR HUNDREDS OF YEARS! Its like they at times dont understand that the color of dark or black peoples skin doesnt instantly make them stand out in a crowd. You cant hide that. An Irish immigrant still looks (and for all intents and purposes is) white. Most Latins (i.e. French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, etc.) can also pass as white in this society. Even in the case of many Asians, we can see this happening too. But the American black has had to fight against buried prejudices and societal bias in favor of fairer skinned individuals in this country for hundreds of years. Not to mention that most every first world nation was able to abolish slavery without a bloody civil war or extreme loss of life; unlike this one.
The United States of America must understand that when millions of people have been cheated for centuries, restitution is a costly process. Inferior education, poor housing, unemployment, inadequate health care; are all bitter components of the oppression that has been the black American heritage. Each will require billions of dollars to correct. As Dr. King also said, Justice so long deferred has accumulated interest and its cost for this society will be substantial in financial as well as human terms. This fact has not been fully grasped, because most of the gains of the past were obtained at bargain rates. The desegregation of public facilities cost nothing; neither did the election and appointment of a few black public officials. Anyway, there's sooo much I could get into/talk about, but I have to go get something to eat, lol. Anywho
For those who care to take a much broader view of what I am discussing here, there are a number of powerful studies mentioned in an article I read on Scientific American a few weeks ago. It is entitled Buried Prejudice: The Bigot in Your Brain and can be found here:
Buried Prejudice: The Bigot in Your Brain: Scientific American
I encourage all to take a look at it and let me know what you think.
Respectfully,
My Two Cents
T.D.
Ciao-
The ONLY people, I feel entitled to reparations in this country, would be the Native Americans. The guilt of what was done to those people by most Americans needs to be addressed and reparations should be made by this government as soon as possible.
The living conditions on most reservations, even today,are appalling and horrific; and a clear shame on the very fabric of this country's soul.
Some implicit biases appear to be rooted in strong emotions. In a 2004 study Ohio State psychologist Wil A. Cunningham and his colleagues measured white peoples brain activity as they viewed a series of white and black faces. The team found that black facesas compared with white facesthat they flashed for only 30 milliseconds (too quickly for participants to notice them) triggered greater activity in the amygdala, a brain area associated with vigilance and sometimes fear. The effect was most pronounced among people who demonstrated strong implicit racial bias. Provocatively, the same study revealed that when faces were shown for half a secondenough time for participants to consciously process themblack faces instead elicited heightened activity in prefrontal brain areas associated with detecting internal conflicts and controlling responses, hinting that individuals were consciously trying to suppress their implicit associations. Why might black faces, in particular, provoke vigilance? Northwestern University psychologist Jennifer A. Richeson speculates that American cultural stereotypes linking young black men with crime, violence and danger are so robust that our brains may automatically give preferential attention to blacks as a category, just as they do for threatening animals such as snakes. In a recent unpublished study Richeson and her colleagues found that white college students visual attention was drawn more quickly to photographs of black versus white men, even though the images were flashed so quickly that participants did not consciously notice them. This heightened vigilance did not appear, however, when the men in the pictures were looking away from the camera. (Averted eye gaze, a signal of submission in humans and other animals, extinguishes explicit perceptions of threat.)
Unconscious racial bias may also infect critical medical decisions. In a 2007 study Banaji and her Harvard colleagues presented 287 internal medicine and emergency care physicians with a photograph and brief clinical vignette describing a middle-aged patientin some cases black and in others whitewho came to the hospital complaining of chest pain. Most physicians did not acknowledge racial bias, but on average they showed (on an implicit bias test) a moderate to large implicit antiblack bias. And the greater a physicians racial bias, the less likely he or she was to give a black patient clot-busting thrombolytic drugs.
Despite such data, some psychologists still question the concept of implicit bias. In a 2004 article in the journal Psychological Inquiry, psychologists Hal R. Arkes of Ohio State and Philip E. Tetlock of the University of California, Berkeley, suggest that implicit associations between, for example, black people and negative words may not necessarily reflect implicit hostility toward blacks. They could as easily reflect other negative feelings, such as shame about black peoples historical treatment at the hands of whites. They also argue that any unfavorable associations about black people we do hold may simply echo shared knowledge of stereotypes in the culture. In that sense, Arkes and Tetlock maintain, implicit measures do not signify anything meaningful about peoples internal state, nor do they deserve to be labeled prejudiceda term they feel should be reserved for attitudes a person deliberately endorses.
The ONLY people, I feel entitled to reparations in this country, would be the Native Americans. The guilt of what was done to those people by most Americans needs to be addressed and reparations should be made by this government as soon as possible.
The living conditions on most reservations, even today,are appalling and horrific; and a clear shame on the very fabric of this country's soul.
...
This is why I'd like this study done in other cultures. Are we reacting at such a primal level due to deeply ingrained cultural biases or do we react like this any time we see someone who appears different from ourselves? It's a question I'd love to have answered.
Most "older" people I know are not in that "wealthiest group" category... but the ones that are didn't just suddenly have a butt-load of money when they turned 50 - they worked hard all their lives, and saved, and planned for the future. What a concept!"older people have it pretty good, they are the wealthiest group in america, and we are currently paying for their social security."
Maybe the older people in YOUR locale have it pretty good. But I happen to know that many older people in my neighborhood aren't doing so well.
Most "older" people I know are not in that "wealthiest group" category... but the ones that are didn't just suddenly have a butt-load of money when they turned 50 - they worked hard all their lives, and saved, and planned for the future. What a concept!
Most "older" people I know are not in that "wealthiest group" category... but the ones that are didn't just suddenly have a butt-load of money when they turned 50 - they worked hard all their lives, and saved, and planned for the future. What a concept!
Clear,
I apologize for my coming off defensive in my answering post to yours. It is evident to me and everyone who has had the opportunity to read any of your postings, on any of the threads, that you are an educated and well-thought out man.
It is a sincere pleasure to share thoughts and rebuttals with you. I admit I was a little hot on this subject, as most people in here tend to play the race card so cavalierly and frequently, without the information to back it up.
You, sir, are a true gentleman, and I once again, apologize for getting a bit peevish in my response to you. You have every right to disagree with my opinions, as I do with yours. However, I don't think we are that far apart in hoping to make this country all it should or could be.
Now, can I have a hug??
Peace to you and yours.
Tim