how many MBs and whats the best camera to use to capture your wenus? im just wondering cause ive tried diff cameras and they always come out different?
Whats the BEST camera to use? MBs?
- Thread starter D_Eddington Wormring
- Start date
- Joined
- May 22, 2011
- Posts
- 989
- Media
- 6
- Likes
- 639
- Points
- 338
- Location
- New York, NY
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
yes thats what i mean, anotherwords, ive used a 3mb camera and an 8mb camera and it comes out way different i feel as though the 8mb camera. im just wondering if anyone use a 21 MB camera to use whats the diff?
haha no, no wall. im just curious since everyone on here uses a camera obviously and thought if someone has tried a 21 MB camera vs a low MB camera if there is a major diff. i currently have a 8mb
I have no idea, but I know this aint much to do with Healthy Penises. Therefore iTow.
mb is megabyte. Nothing to do with pictures. Megapixels is either MP or MPX.
Now, regarding your question. Most cameras over about 10 megapixels have such a high quality image that it stops mattering past this point. Anything below approximately 3 megapixels and you may notice a significant lack in quality.
Now, regarding your question. Most cameras over about 10 megapixels have such a high quality image that it stops mattering past this point. Anything below approximately 3 megapixels and you may notice a significant lack in quality.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2006
- Posts
- 770
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 175
- Points
- 363
- Location
- Tucson (Arizona, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
lol yes, mp's only matter if youre going to blow up an image.
mp measurements are pretty much a scam.
D_Sam Rockswell
Experimental Member
Pixels don't really matter as much as the lens and/or sensor. Although i doubt there's really that big of difference when taking shots of your peen. The kind of lens plus or minus the lighting are the only things that really matter. Oh and distance of your peen to camera. Focal length and all that jazz.
Because I'm a huge nerd I'mma expand on what Puckit said.
Listen, there's a lot more to taking a good picture of your cock than the camera itself, but since you asked:
Megapixels have become increasingly less relevant since the standard hit 8. A 14 megapixel point-and-shoot camera will not get as high-quality a picture as a 10 megapixel full-frame DSLR. Why? Sensor size. The real size that matters when it comes to digital photography is sensor size. A bigger sensor will capture more light. Period. And, in the end, photography is about capturing light.
With a smaller sensor you can have a smaller lens and a more compact camera; however, images come out muddier - and smaller sensors have a harder time capturing a good image under poorer lighting, like the indoor lighting which most guys use to take cock pics. So the closer to credit-card-size your camera is, the harder it will be to get a really nice snap of your dick - generally speaking. Why "generally speaking"?
1) Sometimes smaller cameras are made with better parts, so it's really just a rule of thumb. But mainly 2) A good photographer can figure out how to get a great picture out of almost any camera. In fact, there are photographers who have made their careers getting great pictures out of crummy point-and-shoot cameras. How you treat the subject matter is more important than any technical specification. People debate whether there are any absolute rules in photography, but what I just repeated (cause it sure isn't my original idea) it at the top of the candidate list.
It's getting away from the question you posed (so I'll try to be brief), but to get really great pictures of your cock you need a well-lit room, you need to experiment (which it sounds like you're already doing), and you may want to dig around a photography site, such as About Photography - Photography Lessons, Forums, Contests, and News.
Listen, there's a lot more to taking a good picture of your cock than the camera itself, but since you asked:
Megapixels have become increasingly less relevant since the standard hit 8. A 14 megapixel point-and-shoot camera will not get as high-quality a picture as a 10 megapixel full-frame DSLR. Why? Sensor size. The real size that matters when it comes to digital photography is sensor size. A bigger sensor will capture more light. Period. And, in the end, photography is about capturing light.
With a smaller sensor you can have a smaller lens and a more compact camera; however, images come out muddier - and smaller sensors have a harder time capturing a good image under poorer lighting, like the indoor lighting which most guys use to take cock pics. So the closer to credit-card-size your camera is, the harder it will be to get a really nice snap of your dick - generally speaking. Why "generally speaking"?
1) Sometimes smaller cameras are made with better parts, so it's really just a rule of thumb. But mainly 2) A good photographer can figure out how to get a great picture out of almost any camera. In fact, there are photographers who have made their careers getting great pictures out of crummy point-and-shoot cameras. How you treat the subject matter is more important than any technical specification. People debate whether there are any absolute rules in photography, but what I just repeated (cause it sure isn't my original idea) it at the top of the candidate list.
It's getting away from the question you posed (so I'll try to be brief), but to get really great pictures of your cock you need a well-lit room, you need to experiment (which it sounds like you're already doing), and you may want to dig around a photography site, such as About Photography - Photography Lessons, Forums, Contests, and News.
Similar threads
