OK. I've got my hard-hat on. It may have been asked before, but I'm relatively new here, so bear with it or ignore it. Life's so easy when you got choices. I know I've a position on this as I'm uncut (but then, I'd ahve a position on this if I were cut, too). Why (apart from for religious purposes - which is not a valid reason in my opinion, anyway) does/should a penis have it's foreskin removed? And why is it predominantly performed on infants who don't have the capacity or voice to make there choices known? I hope this don't turn into a "Cut/Uncut is good - Cut/Uncut is bad" flame war (tho something tells me it will). Ho Hum. Yawn. Can anyone really try and justify it for it's own sake (rather than bullshit, spurious, hygiene reasons - if that were the case, women would also be circumcised. Don't even go there. I'm talking about labia circumcision, not clitoral), hygiene is hygiene. Give me a washed uncut one over an unwashed cut one any day of the week.