In National Review, Jonah Goldberg penned a line that really hit me. He was writing about the democrat party brand, but by way of an example of juxtaposing principles he said, "Does anyone believe that progressives will remain so dogmatically pro-choice the day homosexuality can be prevented in utero?" And I got to thinking... Given the argument is that homosexuality is an inborn state, not a choice. Do gay rights advocates run the risk of "pathologising" homosexuality and prompting a search for a "cure" they never wanted? What do you think?
Also, I found this at the LA Times
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/boo...y-in-utero-could-we-would-we-should-we-1.html
Also, I found this at the LA Times
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/boo...y-in-utero-could-we-would-we-should-we-1.html
Last edited: