Which Doctor Who has the biggest cock?

D_alex8

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Posts
8,054
Media
0
Likes
1,388
Points
208
Location
Germany
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
BigJohn9x8 said:
3) It was shot on videotape and therefore looks CHEAP!

I think it's #3, the cheap videotape look to the series.
As EnglishMan has said, watch the two recent seasons with Christopher Eccleston and David Tennant as the Doctor; they are shot on high resolution digital and look amazing, with a "cinematic" feel to each episode and superb fx... indeed very distinct from the 'classic' series...

However, also check out Spearhead from Space with Jon Pertwee from 1970... which was the very first Doctor Who shot in color [http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/classic/episodeguide/spearheadfromspace/]. Due to industrial action by BBC technicians, the whole thing was shot on 16mm film with considerable location filming ... and looks frankly incredible.. almost like a separate movie spin-off to the series, and as such, entirely in a different league to the other shot-on-video Pertwee adventures. It also has a considerably faster editing rate, meaning that the longeurs of the many talkathon scenes in the shot-on-video episodes are absent, with the action really moving apace. It may well not be coincidental that the first episode of the revived series starring Christopher Eccleston was to some extent a remake of the same story.
 

Italian Guy

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Posts
189
Media
0
Likes
36
Points
163
Age
46
Location
Canada
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
EnglishMan said:
In fact the thought of any of the early Doctors nude (except for Peter Davidson) turns my stomach.

I dont think Christopher Eccleston is very well endowed. But I'm sure David Tennant with his long foreskin would be a decent size.

1. Yeah true, well the first 4 doctors were middle-aged and older and not as young and hunky as some of the more recent doctors so it makes sense. My Mom used to think Peter Davison was cute when I watched the show with her as a kid in the 80's, so yeah him being the youngest doctor gave him a following of women (and men) who wanted to sleep with him. The last 3 doctors (McGann, Eccleston and Tennant) are younger and are viewed more as "sexy" compared to the earlier doctors obviously!

2. I can't really tell Eccleston's size, or McGann's for that matter, from their brief nude scenes. Can anyone else? I can't even really tell if they are uncut, although apparently they are according to this site:

http://www.circumstitions.com/Famous5a.html

The circ status of Doctors 1-3 is unknown, #4 is apparently cut, and the others are listed as uncut.
 

Matthew

Legendary Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Posts
7,297
Media
0
Likes
1,680
Points
583
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Awww ... I always thought Adric (sp?) was kinda sweet. :tongue:
 

Snozzle

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 16, 2006
Posts
1,424
Media
6
Likes
319
Points
403
Location
South Pacific
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
alex8 said:
He certainly is... I've labeled the image now for clarity. :rolleyes:
Curious. The ancient Greeks and the Maori of New Zealand did the same, in both cases because revealing the glans was considered immodest. The Greeks called their string kynodesme (dog leash), the Maori, piri-ure (hold-penis). I wonder why Tennent did it (and what he called it (if anything))?
 

Italian Guy

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Posts
189
Media
0
Likes
36
Points
163
Age
46
Location
Canada
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Matthew said:
Awww ... I always thought Adric (sp?) was kinda sweet. :tongue:

Yeah - never understood the dislike of Adric - he's not that bad. I also found it interesting in recent years to discover that Matthew Waterhouse is gay. Good thing to know if I ever meet him. :wink: Besides, there are some nice shots of him in those tight beige pants in Doctor Who. Check out the camera shot from behind in Episode 4 of "Logopolis" for example. :wink:

Most famous of all of course is the apparent erection he gets in his pants while locked up in the Master's web in "Castrovalva". Maybe someone can do some screencaps of that some day. :biggrin1:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crunderwood

davidjh7

Expert Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
2,607
Media
0
Likes
114
Points
283
Location
seattle
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Italian Guy said:
Yeah - never understood the dislike of Adric - he's not that bad. I also found it interesting in recent years to discover that Matthew Waterhouse is gay. Good thing to know if I ever meet him. :wink: Besides, there are some nice shots of him in those tight beige pants in Doctor Who. Check out the camera shot from behind in Episode 4 of "Logopolis" for example. :wink:

Most famous of all of course is the apparent erection he gets in his pants while locked up in the Master's web in "Castrovalva". Maybe someone can do some screencaps of that some day. :biggrin1:

I figured Matthew Waterhouse, and the love/hate relationshsip people tended to have with the character Adric, would come up eventually in this thread--I;m just glad I didn;t have to start it...:biggrin1: I will admit to finding the actor quite attractive when I watched those seasons with him in them. So, does anybody think Matthew was hung? :wink:
 

ccss

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Posts
43
Media
11
Likes
40
Points
338
Location
Byron Bay (New South Wales, Australia)
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Hey Alex8, what's with the picture of John Barrowman's penis inside a sandwich?

The new series just started airing a couple of weeks ago in Australia. I was disappointed that John Barrowman was replaced.

I have to admit I'm strangely drawn to Billie Piper. She's looking good on the show. I still remember her awful first single in the UK, "Because We Want To!" or something like that...went to number one on the charts...and I was like, what the fuck is up with these British people?
 

B_JigBohn9x8

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2006
Posts
166
Media
0
Likes
13
Points
163
FIVE DOCTORS

This thread inspired me to watch "The Five Doctors", the 20th anniversary episode again. I really enjoyed it.

Peter Davison is very good looking, hung, and likes to show his bulge. His striped trousers accentuate the outline of his cock. At the start I thought "he likes to show his bulge!" and at that instant he put both his hands in his pockets and I could see his knob.

The previous 4 doctors are old, unappealing and too proper and modest to ever wear clothes that might display their bulge.

The shot on video look is worst for the high tech stuff. Expensive costumes and elaborate sets also suffer. Surprisingly, outdoor scenes look OK to good. The cybermen are mostly ouside and look good and a misty mountain scene looks quite nice. Compared to film, video does not look rich, but sharp, crisp & cheap with a narrower depth of field.

The cheap & cheesy special effects are unique, and a refreshing change from the monotonous digital perfection in modern special effects. They all look the same, right off the Industrial Light & Magic assembly line.

I read that although the series was made for kids, it appeals to adults who understand the humour and the references. I don't get any references or humour in the series. Also, I've never liked Tom Baker and his fucking scarf. Why was he so successful? Does he have a big cock?

I want more Peter Davison!
 

lordduzi

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Posts
206
Media
0
Likes
113
Points
263
Location
Suburb of Seattle
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
BigJohn9x8 said:
Perhaps if I knew which Doctor Who has the biggest cock I would watch his episodes.

I do have lots of Doctor Who on video, but I've never liked it much, even though I love Sci-Fi and I'm obsessed with the 4th dimension (time). I can only think of 3 possible reasons:

1) The British aren't very good at Science Fiction;
2) Doctor Who is meant for kids; and
3) It was shot on videotape and therefore looks CHEAP!

I think it's #3, the cheap videotape look to the series. George Lucas aimed Star Wars at 12 year olds, and I love Star Wars. England has produced some good science fiction.

Can anybody think of another reason why I don't like Doctor Who much?

I have been a Dr. Who fan for many years, and I have heard the show maligned because of the "cheap" aspects of the show. I think we are conditioned for the cinematic effect of movie house production like Star Wars, when we really should be looking at the heart of a good story the plot and the characters. Dr. Who has an intriguing cast of Doctors, Companions, villians and others, with an interesting selection of settings.

I personally have never been fond of the companions apparently selected for screaming, like Susan Foreman or Tegan. My favorites have been the more physically active companions like Leela (Can I slice him now, Doctor?) and Ace (How much Nitro-9 do we need to blow it up). Then there are the competent companions like Turlough (hot redhead), Adric (way cute) and Neela. I just finished re-watching the Keys of Marinus in which the first Doctor, William Hartnell, is helped by Altos played by Robin Phillips who runs around in a shawl or plaid that shows he is wearing black briefs underneath.
 

soullessfire

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
25
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
223
You can't take the piss out of Dr Who for being cheesy! But this was going for a long time before you yanks ever shot Star Trek, and I'd hardly call the effects in that great.

I think that looking at the series you have to realise that it was made a long time ago, and even in big budget films from then, the effects are dodgy.

However, the wobbly sets were one of the things that made it British :rolleyes: I'm sure a lot of people hold it in regard for the fact that the story was more important.

Anyhow...

Billie Piper's Nickname for Tennant on-set was "Ten-Inch"... Make of that what you will.

For me, Turlough and Adric were fine. I just hated bloody Bonnie Langford's character... I used to wish she'd die every episode, and was greatly relieved when Ace turned up! :rolleyes:
 

Ionto

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Posts
616
Media
0
Likes
44
Points
163
Location
Paris
Gender
Male
Snozzle said:
Curious. The ancient Greeks and the Maori of New Zealand did the same, in both cases because revealing the glans was considered immodest. The Greeks called their string kynodesme (dog leash), the Maori, piri-ure (hold-penis). I wonder why Tennent did it (and what he called it (if anything))?

Must say I am quite envious of Tennent’s generous provision of foreskin.

I would imagine that most men (most Europeans at any rate) would have difficulty in gathering enough skin to tie a knot, and for some it would be quite impossible. I wonder too how men with short foreskins fared in those societies where tying the end of the foreskin up was a social norm. Or did the Greeks have longer foreskins than their modern counterparts ?

Sorry if this is hijacking the thread.
 

Italian Guy

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2006
Posts
189
Media
0
Likes
36
Points
163
Age
46
Location
Canada
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
BigJohn9x8 said:
FIVE DOCTORS

This thread inspired me to watch "The Five Doctors", the 20th anniversary episode again. I really enjoyed it.

Peter Davison is very good looking, hung, and likes to show his bulge. His striped trousers accentuate the outline of his cock. At the start I thought "he likes to show his bulge!" and at that instant he put both his hands in his pockets and I could see his knob.

I'll have to check this episode out again to see this! :biggrin1: I have seen a number of photos of Peter Davison over the years which show he has a bulge. I don't know if he is a porn star or anything, but I guess his pencil still has lead as he fathered a child a few years ago when he was about 50. :biggrin1:
 

lordduzi

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Posts
206
Media
0
Likes
113
Points
263
Location
Suburb of Seattle
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Ionto said:
Must say I am quite envious of Tennent’s generous provision of foreskin.

I would imagine that most men (most Europeans at any rate) would have difficulty in gathering enough skin to tie a knot, and for some it would be quite impossible. I wonder too how men with short foreskins fared in those societies where tying the end of the foreskin up was a social norm. Or did the Greeks have longer foreskins than their modern counterparts ?

Sorry if this is hijacking the thread.

The Greeks only worried about keeping the glans covered when they were naked, admittedly that was a fair amount of time (gymnasium-place to be naked). So you need to take into account shrinkage from the cold, and of course the foreskin could always be stretched enough to allow you to "properly" tie to cancel the glans.