Which style of Circumcision do you think is best?

[grboy202]

i think i am high and bit loose. i wad young when i did it and didn't know what to ask. that left me with a bit ugly penis as the stich marks are noticable. also there is not much sencitivity on the head. i 'd say 4.

 

[nicecircjob]

I like high and tight. I was circumcised as and adult and didn't know I had an option for the style of cut. I got a low and loose cut. But I like the high and tight better.

 

[Flotiz]

It's not me, but I think this is one of the most beautiful circumcisions (from an aesthetic point of view) I've ever seen:

 

[CJF88]

My personal preference would be high & tight

 

[RogerFederer1]

As low and tight as you can get, with complete frenulum removal. Anything but a numb desensitised dick just won’t do. Love it. Picture below is not me but I think it’s perfect. Love it to be mine.

 

[Mcuthigh]

My personal preference would be high & tight

Totally agree that high and tight looks and feels the best.

 

[Borkbork]

None

 

[paget54]

There's a style? Hell, mine is the only one I've ever had and I've NEVER thought about the style. I get a LOT of pleasure from my cock which is all that matter to me.

 

[LargeUnit]

I’m thankful for my high and super tight cut....

 

[gaytwinkbottom]

.

This is the second thread about circumcision in which you've posted an uncut cock. Troll. Reported.

 

[iluvmen]

I’m thankful for my high and super tight cut....

View attachment 19489091

That large head should have been always on display. Therefore I cannot think of you being uncircumcised.

 

[iluvmen]

I am totally against circumcision except some urgent medical cases.

But if a man has to be circumcised, I believe that a loose circumcision is the best. It helps you while you jerk off and also keeps the head covered when it is under fabric, in your underwear. So, the damage your penis head gets lessens. The keratinization is limitied. Also, frenulum should definitely stay untouched. Because it is full of nerve endings. Thanks to the surgeon who circ'd me, I have a frenulum. I feel pity for the men who are extremely tight circumcised and had their frenulum removed.

 

[gaytwinkbottom]

I am totally against circumcision except some urgent medical cases.

But if a man has to be circumcised, I believe that a loose circumcision is the best. It helps you while you jerk off and also keeps the head covered when it is under fabric, in your underwear. So, the damage your penis head gets lessens. The keratinization is limitied. Also, frenulum should definitely stay untouched. Because it is full of nerve endings. Thanks to the surgeon who circ'd me, I have a frenulum. I feel pity for the men who are extremely tight circumcised and had their frenulum removed.

Why only "urgent medical cases"? I'm getting circumcised later this year for phimosis, which is hardly "urgent", but that doesn't mean it's bad or I should be banned from getting it done. I think a really loose circumcision sort of defeats a main point of being circumcised, which is easier hygiene. I know there's such a thing as too tight, but I don't want a loose cut. I don't want loads of bunched of skin behind the head when flaccid, as it'd look so ugly and smegma could accumulate there. If your glans penis if going to still be covered when your dick is flaccid, what's even the point in getting cut? I have a frenulum breve so I imagine they'll remove my frenulum as well, but I prefer that as I think it'd look neater, and a lot of the nerves are under the frenulum, not in the frenulum itself. I have an American friend with a tight cut (not painfully so, but he needs lube to jerk off) and he doesn't mind it. I don't pity them.

 

[1360895]

High and tight - obvious two toned, no frenulum and a big flared knob. So nice to suck

 

[japetty]

High and tight - obvious two toned, no frenulum and a big flared knob. So nice to suck

You like to suck a circumcised penis but you have uncircumcised penis? You don't mind sucking a circumcised penis but you don't want one? Can you elaborate on that subject a bit to help me understand?

 

[1360895]

You like to suck a circumcised penis but you have uncircumcised penis? You don't mind sucking a circumcised penis but you don't want one? Can you elaborate on that subject a bit to help me understand?

I think cut cock look and taste great.

Although also very happy with mine and wouldn’t want to go through unnecessary surgery (with cost and possible pain, complications etc). Plus adult circs sometimes don’t look as good.

But do appreciate a well cut cock. Is that weird?

 

[Mcuthigh]

I am totally against circumcision except some urgent medical cases.

But if a man has to be circumcised, I believe that a loose circumcision is the best. It helps you while you jerk off and also keeps the head covered when it is under fabric, in your underwear. So, the damage your penis head gets lessens. The keratinization is limitied. Also, frenulum should definitely stay untouched. Because it is full of nerve endings. Thanks to the surgeon who circ'd me, I have a frenulum. I feel pity for the men who are extremely tight circumcised and had their frenulum removed.

I have a high and tight circumcision and would not like it any other way. None of my friends or relatives have ever been diagnosed to have keratinization of the penis and I will allow my frenulum to be touch anytime someone would like. BTW - all of us were circumcised as infants (we have no memory of the procedure), the degree to which our frenulums developed varies but it is a primary area for stimulation just like uncut guys. You also allege that one's frenulum is " full of nerve endings" and you "feel pity for the men who are extremely tight circumcised and had their frenulum removed." Therefore, one can infer from your allegations that:

1) Foreskin Lovers really do fuss and worry about the underwear that we circ'd guys wear...right down to the "fabric". The fuss is much like women making play clothes out of curtains. I like my underwear and if they rub me until I have an erection.....Cool!

2. Keratinization - the process in which the cytoplasm of the outermost cells of the vertebrate epidermis is replaced by keratin. Keratinization occurs in the stratum corneum, feathers, hair, claws, nails, hooves, and horns. I suppose that if you are looking for a picture of a circumcised penis with keratinization, you will find one after which you will then conclude that all cut males will have keratinization. Not true! Similarly, if I see a picture of an un-circumcised penis with a 2-inch elephant trunk, foreskin overhang ...therefore, all uncut guys must look this way. Again, these Foreskin Lovers seem to infer that all penis' will fall on a Penis Sensitivity Scale with the beloved un-circumcised penis (with as much foreskin as you can stuff into your trouble-free underwear plus a frenulum just "full of nerve endings") being the Best of Class and, of course. st the other end of the scale is the Most Aesthetically Beautiful RIC'd penis covered with the assumed incurable Keratinization.
Note: According to a new scientific study of the subject, circumcision does not appear to influence sensitivity of the penis. Clifford B. Bleustein, MD, with the department of Urology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York

cle is from the WebMD News Archivei
April 30, 2003 (Chicago) -- Circumcision does not appear to influence sensitivity of the penis, according to a new study of the subject.
Clifford B. Bleustein, MD, with the department of urology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, "and this is a scientific way of trying to answer that question," he tells WebMD.



Bleustein and colleagues presented their findings at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association.



To evaluate the effects of circumcision on sensitivity, the researchers used specialized instruments to test 36 circumcised and 43 uncircumcised men with or without a history of erectile dysfunction. They tested each man for level of sensitivity in the penis through vibration, pressure, and warm and cold temperatures. In uncircumcised males, the foreskin was retracted for testing.




Initially, decreased sensation was demonstrated in uncircumcised men for feeling temperature and vibration. But when they took age, hypertension, and diabetes into account, they saw no difference in the sensitivity measure between circumcised and uncircumcised men. In addition, "Our study shows that there were no differences in terms of penile sensitivity, either in men that have normal function and in those who have erectile dysfunction," says Bleustein.

Why only "urgent medical cases"? I'm getting circumcised later this year for phimosis, which is hardly "urgent", but that doesn't mean it's bad or I should be banned from getting it done. I think a really loose circumcision sort of defeats a main point of being circumcised, which is easier hygiene. I know there's such a thing as too tight, but I don't want a loose cut. I don't want loads of bunched of skin behind the head when flaccid, as it'd look so ugly and smegma could accumulate there. If your glans penis if going to still be covered when your dick is flaccid, what's even the point in getting cut? I have a frenulum breve so I imagine they'll remove my frenulum as well, but I prefer that as I think it'd look neater, and a lot of the nerves are under the frenulum, not in the frenulum itself. I have an American friend with a tight cut (not painfully so, but he needs lube to jerk off) and he doesn't mind it. I don't pity them.

 

[deleted1334580]

Medium (circ scar maybe 1/2-3/4" behind glans when erect) and tight.

 

[japetty]

I think cut cock look and taste great.

Although also very happy with mine and wouldn’t want to go through unnecessary surgery (with cost and possible pain, complications etc). Plus adult circs sometimes don’t look as good.

But do appreciate a well cut cock. Is that weird?

Many (not all) of the uncircumcised guys here write like they very much dislike circumcision or even the thought of it. I was just looking into the fact you sounded so different than they. This Forum is the only place I have ever been where I hear so many uncircumcised guys butt heads about circumcision.

Thanks for the explanation. I really appreciate it. You have a good day

 

[gaytwinkbottom]

I have a high and tight circumcision and would not like it any other way. None of my friends or relatives have ever been diagnosed to have keratinization of the penis and I will allow my frenulum to be touch anytime someone would like. BTW - all of us were circumcised as infants (we have no memory of the procedure), the degree to which our frenulums developed varies but it is a primary area for stimulation just like uncut guys. You also allege that one's frenulum is " full of nerve endings" and you "feel pity for the men who are extremely tight circumcised and had their frenulum removed." Therefore, one can infer from your allegations that:

1) Foreskin Lovers really do fuss and worry about the underwear that we circ'd guys wear...right down to the "fabric". The fuss is much like women making play clothes out of curtains. I like my underwear and if they rub me until I have an erection.....Cool!

2. Keratinization - the process in which the cytoplasm of the outermost cells of the vertebrate epidermis is replaced by keratin. Keratinization occurs in the stratum corneum, feathers, hair, claws, nails, hooves, and horns. I suppose that if you are looking for a picture of a circumcised penis with keratinization, you will find one after which you will then conclude that all cut males will have keratinization. Not true! Similarly, if I see a picture of an un-circumcised penis with a 2-inch elephant trunk, foreskin overhang ...therefore, all uncut guys must look this way. Again, these Foreskin Lovers seem to infer that all penis' will fall on a Penis Sensitivity Scale with the beloved un-circumcised penis (with as much foreskin as you can stuff into your trouble-free underwear plus a frenulum just "full of nerve endings") being the Best of Class and, of course. st the other end of the scale is the Most Aesthetically Beautiful RIC'd penis covered with the assumed incurable Keratinization.
Note: According to a new scientific study of the subject, circumcision does not appear to influence sensitivity of the penis. Clifford B. Bleustein, MD, with the department of Urology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York

cle is from the WebMD News Archivei
April 30, 2003 (Chicago) -- Circumcision does not appear to influence sensitivity of the penis, according to a new study of the subject.
Clifford B. Bleustein, MD, with the department of urology at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, "and this is a scientific way of trying to answer that question," he tells WebMD.



Bleustein and colleagues presented their findings at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association.



To evaluate the effects of circumcision on sensitivity, the researchers used specialized instruments to test 36 circumcised and 43 uncircumcised men with or without a history of erectile dysfunction. They tested each man for level of sensitivity in the penis through vibration, pressure, and warm and cold temperatures. In uncircumcised males, the foreskin was retracted for testing.




Initially, decreased sensation was demonstrated in uncircumcised men for feeling temperature and vibration. But when they took age, hypertension, and diabetes into account, they saw no difference in the sensitivity measure between circumcised and uncircumcised men. In addition, "Our study shows that there were no differences in terms of penile sensitivity, either in men that have normal function and in those who have erectile dysfunction," says Bleustein.

Well said.