Who Barebacks?

Barebacking or condoms and cum in gay anal sex

  • Condoms or no sex at all

    Votes: 18 25.0%
  • Condoms if I have one, but if not...

    Votes: 3 4.2%
  • Barebacking but only in a committed relationship

    Votes: 29 40.3%
  • Barebacking for the super hot guys only

    Votes: 9 12.5%
  • Barebacking every time (if ass is clean)

    Votes: 8 11.1%
  • Barebacking even if ass is dirty

    Votes: 2 2.8%
  • I hate cum in my ass when barebacking

    Votes: 1 1.4%
  • I love cum in my ass but let it flow out after sex

    Votes: 2 2.8%
  • I love cum in my ass and keep it in there for as long as possible

    Votes: 20 27.8%

  • Total voters
    72
  • Poll closed .

a01020304

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Posts
25
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
148
Location
Germany
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Its well known that sex without condoms is classed as unsafe, some guys wear condoms and some choose not to.
When it comes down to it, its the personal choice of those sexual partners whether they do or not.

Lets NOT get into a slagging match on the rights and wrongs of barebacking., leave that for other threads.

but...

Who is willing to admit honestly that they bareback? please do not answer if you have done it in that past, this is a question relating to if you bareback frequently.
 

a01020304

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Posts
25
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
148
Location
Germany
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I will be first and say that i do. The reason being is I hate condoms and its my personal choice not to mwear them. I do not hide this fact from sexial partners, they know my views and we make a mutal decision. It should be the two individual partners to decide and not others preating their safe sex ways.
 
D

deleted213967

Guest
Moreover, it is well-known that so-called "personal" decisions can have costly repercussions on much-larger groups...

...say...when the infected asshole requires years of ultra-expensive treatment to contain the disease that will kill him...all paid for by the self-righteous ones who actually bother to wear a condom...

...or when the "personally"-chosen risk oh-so-accidentally spills over to the hundreds of other partners the said asshole will have over time...

etc., etc.

 

nudeyorker

Admired Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Posts
22,744
Media
0
Likes
776
Points
208
Location
NYC/Honolulu
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: rayray

Jasper72

Experimental Member
Joined
May 11, 2008
Posts
144
Media
0
Likes
7
Points
103
Location
StL/636
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
below the waist, I've never gone in uncovered.

Above the waist, it's a good thing they make flavored condoms.
but I don't usually use them, topside.

then again, I'm not a total slut like others in my family.
 

B_Morning_Glory

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Posts
1,855
Media
0
Likes
30
Points
183
Location
lucasville, ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
Hope you have good health care...good luck with that!


yes i have had good luck with that thank you, i been doing it bareback for the last 16 yrs, with my hubby, also when we met we done it several times bareback, in the bast bfs, saddled up or they done with out he was diffrent and it was my prefrence to do bareback with him was great and still is.
 

pronatalist

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Posts
916
Media
0
Likes
47
Points
193
Location
U.S.
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I believe that the natural flow of human life should flow naturally unhindered.

Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.

So pair up, get married, reproduce naturally.

That probably means, ahem, frequent penis-in-vagina "barebacking." And pushing in deep, when cumming.

I'm no Catholic, but Protestant, so I'm not into Catholic-tolerated rhythm or NFP. As don't those also aim to prevent possible human life?

Whatever happened to, babies happen when they happen?

It worked fairly well for our ancestors.
 

jason_els

<img border="0" src="/images/badges/gold_member.gi
Joined
Dec 16, 2004
Posts
10,228
Media
0
Likes
162
Points
193
Location
Warwick, NY, USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Whatever happened to, babies happen when they happen?

It worked fairly well for our ancestors.

No, it didn't. The United States already has the worst infant mortality in the western world and if you think that's bad, that's nothing compared to previous times when death routinely took not only children but their mother as well. In many times and places having children has not been a wise choice. I do not believe that if providence has given humans the apparently unique gift of foresight that we shouldn't use it wisely.
 

pronatalist

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Posts
916
Media
0
Likes
47
Points
193
Location
U.S.
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
No, it didn't. The United States already has the worst infant mortality in the western world and if you think that's bad, that's nothing compared to previous times when death routinely took not only children but their mother as well. In many times and places having children has not been a wise choice. I do not believe that if providence has given humans the apparently unique gift of foresight that we shouldn't use it wisely.

That's because we have a pathetic medical rip-off industry, and rampant abortions.

I didn't say anything against having prenatal care, home-birthing midwives, hospital births, or whatever medical assistance may reasonably be needed. Just that medical care should welcome human life, not try to prevent or take human life.

And "family planning" ought to mean planning for natural family growth. Because of such misleadingly defined terms, that's why I use terms like "birth control" in quotes. Because it's not very reliable at "control" at preventing conception. And some forms of "birth control" are said to be abortifacients, such as the pill and awful IUD.
 

Blueshift

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2006
Posts
58
Media
8
Likes
16
Points
228
Location
Boston, MA
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
The Earth is pretty darn full already. I don't really have a problem with people not contributing to the global population issue. That whole "go forth and be fruitful" thing doesn't mean "go forth and be like unto rabbits". If you can't support a child, don't try to have one and take steps that help you not have one.

God gave us many things. One of these is (supposedly) sense and reason and the ability to apply both to not only the world He created, but the words written down by men.
 
D

deleted213967

Guest
I believe that the natural flow of human life should flow naturally unhindered.

Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.

So pair up, get married, reproduce naturally.

Somehow I have a notion that's not the kind of barebacking the OP intended to discuss...

BTW I have nothing against babies; some of my best friends are babies.
 

Xcuze

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2008
Posts
2,890
Media
0
Likes
233
Points
283
Location
In a treehouse
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
When it comes to sex men can often behave like dumb animals. Barebackers are people who dont love life enough to wanna hold on to it. They also tend to be a bit sleazey too, frankly. Do what you fucking like & suffer the consequences. But you dont live in a vacuum & innocent people will always be dragged into it one way or another. Financially & emotionally.
 

Viking_UK

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Posts
1,226
Media
0
Likes
148
Points
283
Location
Scotland
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
There's a big difference between barebacking within and outwith a relationship. If you're monogamous, I don't see any problem with it. If you sleep around, you should use condoms. I've been with my other half for nearly 14 years now and we bareback. For the first year of our relationship we used condoms, but once we decided that we were in it for the long haul, we stopped using them. We've had a couple of threesomes in that time but each time, the condoms came out again.
It's all about behaving responsibly and respectfully towards each other. Yeah, barebacking feels better, but is it worth risking your own life and the lives of others for a bit of extra sensation?
 

pronatalist

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Posts
916
Media
0
Likes
47
Points
193
Location
U.S.
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
The Earth is pretty darn full already. I don't really have a problem with people not contributing to the global population issue. That whole "go forth and be fruitful" thing doesn't mean "go forth and be like unto rabbits". If you can't support a child, don't try to have one and take steps that help you not have one.

God gave us many things. One of these is (supposedly) sense and reason and the ability to apply both to not only the world He created, but the words written down by men.

Not really. The world could hold, or be made to hold, lots more people. By expecting all the various nations to populate up denser with people, especially by their own natural increase—their very own children, the planet which isn't getting any bigger, could easily hold quite a lot more people.

And sex is all the more erotic, when thinking of doing one's part, to further enlarge the human race, for the greater good of the many.

There could become all the more places with lots of people, and fewer places far from lots of people. Let cities and towns, grow larger and closer together. Naturally letting not only world population, but world population density rise naturally, answers so many of the pressing questions. How are people to enjoy having all their children or "all the children God gives," in a world with so many people alive already? Well we could explore how to more comfortably and safely populate the planet denser. We could "scoot over" a bit, to find or make some place for our fellow man. Rather than asking people to go against nature and life in trying to prevent possible human life, people can simply live and breed in closer proximity to other people, on the global scale at least.

Many countries are already passing the "tipping point" of going from having multiple acres of land per person, to multiple people per acre. I calculate that India has around 3 people per 2 acres. While not all such countries are the best example of how to more efficiently populate the land, they do at least suggest the possibility that the human race was actually designed to potentially grow quite vast and dense.

Anyway, regardless whether some population phobics say the world is supposedly "too crowded" or not, I would like the prospect of enjoying having a "traditionally very large" family, and have no intention to try any of Big Pharma shoddy "birth control" methods. "No method" barebacking is natural and what God's commandment to Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth, would seem to imply. Similarly, I imagine many other people feel or believe in some like manner. At the Walk for Life I attended to raise money for the local Pregnancy Care Center, and as a great social activity and place to meet people, some guy said they have 4 children, and don't use any birth control. So if the world is pretty darn full already, shouldn't we then plan for it to naturally grow even fuller? They say the world now has a billion teenagers, and quite many of them obviously must have come from large families and may much prefer to grow themselves large families as well. All those more people to experience life and all those precious souls coming to life, has got to count for something. And what's a few minor population "growing pains" compared to all the more fellow humans enjoying and experiencing life?

BTW, if I do those front yard baby announcement sign things, I would prefer the bunny rabbit version, not the stork version. As to suggest, "No, we aren't done yet. We plan to keep having more babies, until they just don't come anymore." And for the greater good of the many, I suggest that all my neighbors, people I know or might influence, and people in other countries, welcome the natural flow of human life unhindered, encouraging naturally large families worldwide. Widespread and persistant baby booms to go ahead and proudly fill up the earth with ever more people. Babies are the best possible outcome of sex, as while the reproductive urges are indeed enjoyable temporarily, children generally last a lifetime, and make a profound impact upon the world.

I say when God commanded people to Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth, that implied that it was God to determine the human population size, not man. Wouldn't our Lord be honored, to see humans actually obey one of God's commandments for a change, and for the Lord to return to a planet teeming and bursting at the seams seemingly, with human life? As the "religious" would say, it's all the more souls to populate heaven. As the sci-fi fans and pragmatists would say, it's all the more people to populate more worlds and drive forth the technology progress. And naturally growing more numerous, is great progress for the human race either way.