"to"? "to" was your proposition and not a 3way with Sarah Pale-twins?
How unfortunate.:frown1:
You not only lost the election, but your libido too.:09:j/k
Who is the stupidest poster of all time?
- Thread starter B_Hickboy
- Start date
"to"? "to" was your proposition and not a 3way with Sarah Pale-twins?
How unfortunate.:frown1:
You not only lost the election, but your libido too.:09:j/k
Hmm... Oh REALLY???Mem seems to have matured quite a bit...
My second cousin was a murderer (in a rather famous case).
NOTE: I've had absolutely no interaction with him, positive or negative, in just over a year now. Then, out of nowhere, the above pops up.
- Mem,
Hmm... Oh REALLY???
NOTE: I've had absolutely no interaction with him, positive or negative, in just over a year now. Then, out of nowhere, the above pops up.
I thought it was a funny line. I would have used it with many members here, regardless of them being a friend of mine or not.
Right... Yeah, that Hitler, he's always great for a laugh. And of all the posters in this thread that you could've used your "funny line" on, you just HAPPENED to choose me? (It's a rhetorical question, not needing, or wanting, of an answer.)
- Mem,
Right... Yeah, that Hitler, he's always great for a laugh. And of all the posters in this thread that you could've used your "funny line" on, you just HAPPENED to choose me? (It's a rhetorical question, not needing, or wanting, of an answer.)
If they had mentioned that their second cousin was a famous murderer I would have used the line on them.
So much for your understanding of "rhetorical" and "not needing, or wanting, of an answer".
With plenty of others mentioning their connections to the subject, all much closer than mine, and there being nothing linking second cousins and murder to Hitler, the only conclusion that can be drawn, is that your post, much like this entire conversation, can only be seen as you trying to dig up your old baiting practices.
- Mem,
So much for your understanding of "rhetorical" and "not needing, or wanting, of an answer".
With plenty of others mentioning their connections to the subject, all much closer than mine, and there being nothing linking second cousins and murder to Hitler, the only conclusion that can be drawn, is that your post, much like this entire conversation, can only be seen as you trying to dig up your old baiting practices.
We don't like each other, let's leave it at that. If I thought that you would get so upset over the post I wouldn't have made it. I think you are better than that.
Ah, chill out, Mem.
Hick and I were talking about las-quadruple-oh-5 and I said he was the new Mem. C'mon - you know you pissed people off when you were new here and you know you're not the stupidest poster of all time. Why get pissy about it?
I'm going to go with a Lafever/Arliss combo.
I never saw Mem as stupid ever.
C.B.:saevil:
I never saw Mem as stupid ever.
C.B.:saevil:
I want to see those pictures Marley marl!
I like Stronzo I've never had a problem with him.
cigarbabe:saevil:
This from the man who calls a circumcision a 'sexual experience'. The crown jewel for stupidity is yours for the taking. :smile:. Your competition is way behind you.
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL. i have to agree with you their sargon. I'm so glad for the ignore button. i haven't mist his stupid fetish foreskin BS one bit . he definably holds the worlds record for this question ask in this thread. has nothing to offer what so ever an when it does post its twisted nonsense from some link he recreated in his own mind to fulfill his fetish mind about a certain subject he knows nothing about. a lot of the post proves this, an some have even told it.... so in the past but it.... don't know how to comprehend anything some times i fear here.:wink:
Similar threads
