Why are black cocks always labeled as BBC ?

validi

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Posts
603
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
103
Location
at my home
Sexuality
Unsure
An honest question , i'm just wondering , is it part of the whole ir fantasy ? or do 99% of white americans all have tiny cocks ? I'm just a bit perplexed because based on what i usually see in porn , it seems pretty clear to me that whatever the size of the "big" black cock is , it keeps being labeled as "big" even when the guy is average at best.

But when a guy has the same size as a black guy's cock (and i'm not just talking about whites in particular here , whatever the race) , you'll never see this automatism. (the reflex to add the "big" adjectif). Why is that ?

Not to mention that blacks have to live up to absurd myths and it puts pressure on the guy who's not equiped like Lexington for instance.

Why do sites like blackonblondes are supposed to be shocking or controversial ? Why are the girls always in awe when the black guy's cock is normal ? (or slightly bigger than the norm).

Guys like Mandingo or Shane Diesel...Are part of the BBC gang in my book , but it's a fucking rarity. And yet , it apparently seems normal to always label a black guy's cock as BBC...

Is this deep rooted racism ? Is it part of a cuckold fetish ? (to feel inferior ? )...Or is the BBC myth so engraved in people's minds that they're seeing distorted dicks as soon as they see a black one ? kinda like Horses...?

(horses see humans as a lot bigger than we are in real life)

I hope no one gets offended but i don't see what the whole BBC difference really is (at least in porn.)... And don't bother mentioning the exceptions to the rule..(such as the usual suspects , Napier , Castro , Shorty Mac)...Again , i'm talking "in general" here.
 
Last edited:

Deno

Cherished Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Posts
4,630
Media
1
Likes
439
Points
303
Sexuality
No Response
hey I like big cock no matter how you spell it.

It's treacherous...I'm almost wishing that I wasn't black anymore, lol!
noway man thats something to be proud of all those abs and that schtick.
 

marleyisalegend

Loved Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Posts
6,126
Media
1
Likes
621
Points
333
Age
38
Location
charlotte
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Because stupid pricks buy into it. They wouldn't exaggerate the cock-size if they knew sorry ass queens weren't salivating at the prospect of watching a huge (but actually average) sized mandingo warrior tear up the innocent little white twink.

I was just thinking to myself, "It's been awhile since we've had a "black cocks" thread. LPSG never disappoints.
 

flame boy

Account Disabled
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Posts
3,189
Media
0
Likes
200
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
Porn is just like any other product - there has to be a catch in order to reach your target audience. In the case of black men appearing in porn, the usual catch is "big black cock" or "huge black dick" - by giving the porno this kind of title it will find its appropriate audience.

In many cases the cock in question may be distcintly average, but its part of the fantasty of porn. If you're looking for "BBC" then you will be happy with what comes up in search results. No matter of it's actually big or if the dick is just normal size, if you're looking for big cocks you will buy into the fantasy if the website is bragging about the sizeable performers.

Other examples of porn catagorising include twenty-somethings as "barely legal" and thirty-somethings as "older". It doesn't have to make sense but as long as the porn producers make their cash, they aren't going to care if their porn titles are wholly accurate.
 

ledroit

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2005
Posts
809
Media
1
Likes
59
Points
248
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
It helps sell the porn. Who wants to buy tiny black cock porn?

I do! I do!! Look at this cute guy. Completely irresistible.

But the pic does not seem to be labeled as BBC. Therefore the premise of the thread is disproved. BC's are not ALWAYS labeled as BBC. Sometimes they are HBC, SBC, CBC, NBC, and even MBFC.
 

Attachments

pat88

1st Like
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Posts
8
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
223
Location
United States
Sexuality
Unsure
One of the B should be for beautiful, so you would have "black beautiful cock" or "big beautiful cock" I do believe percentage wise blacks are bigger, only 13% of the country is black, Butt it's easy to find big blacks guys not so easy with whites. Rare to find very small blacks not so rare to find small whites.
 

validi

Experimental Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Posts
603
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
103
Location
at my home
Sexuality
Unsure
I don't think most of you understood my original question...
I understand why porn producers are doing what they're doing...(though like i said...it seems to me that actual "bbc" as in..."real" ones , are quite fucking rare , yet they're all labeled as bbc)...

But what i truely want to understand is what triggers "people"...(as in..."normal people" , the "viewers" , "consumers" )...to always label a black guy's cock as bbc ?

In general , i see many people always reffering interracial scene as "white girl sucking "big" black cock" etc....etc..

Like i said...It seems to be engraved in their brains. BBC this , BBC that...It's absurd.

Let's take amateurs for example...let's forget "professional porn"...
Even amateurs or you know.."cuckolds"...You know the type ? The guy who lets his wife fuck another guy & watches or masturbates while watching..

I've seen some of these in amateur vids to understand what the whole fetish was about and what struck me is that not only are these people letting their wives getting fucked by poor looking men (ugly as fuck) , but even by guys with small to average dicks....and on rare cases , slightly bigger than average...(and in extremely rare cases , by "monster" cocks when they can find one)

I don't know...it seems that as long as the guy is black...the illusion works for them.
It's just kinda odd. They're somehow convincing themselves that what they're seeing is bigger maybe ?...I don't know what goes on in their heads , but i have to admit that it's confusing.

And while we're at it. I also do not understand the whole principal of "black history month" .

I'd love to hear from black LPSG users...I'd like them to share their opinion on this issue. Isn't a "black history month" insulting ?

For instance , i've read several times some whites complaining that "we don't have a white history month"...

But from my point of view. Since whites have all the other months of the year , why bother ?... Knowing this fact...i find the logic behind "black history month" to be insulting. Because it somehow insinuates that blacks are a special case. We don't have an "asian history month" nor a "latino history month"..but blacks do. And when i say "special case" , it's not in a good way.

I think any decent black man should be pissed about this.

(sort of like positive discrimination , the concept behind it is ridiculous...and insults the personal achievements and intelligence of the person who's concerned)
 
Last edited: