Why are human females so obsessed with penis size? - The Guardian (UK Newspaper)

[petite]

You really didn't absorb a word that I wrote did you? Why should we even bother continuing the discussion then? I said size queens in the aesthetic sense.

You are right, I misunderstood. I always thought size queens were women who preferred to have sex with men who have larger penises, not women who just enjoyed looking at them. I suppose I am a size queen, too, then. I also like looking at large penises. By your definition, I am a size queen who does not prefer to have sex with large penises.

Liking the appearance of large penises is completely unrelated to enjoying sex with one. You don't seem to understand female sexual satisfaction and the reasons why a woman would or wouldn't prefer a larger penis at all.

I agree with you on another point. I also don't desire to continue this discussion. You are not fun to discuss this issue with.

 

[TheRob]

Typical of the English press really.

typical of all press really

 

[pcghabsy]

It's an interesting read. Not a serious analysis at all, in fact it is a load of BS, but a fun read anyway.

 

[AlteredEgo]

I don't want to read it but wouldn't be as simple as humans are the only species on earth that have sex for pleasure?

Um... No. We're not. Some other primates have sex for pleasure, some sea mammals have sex for pleasure, and I'm sure other animals I don't know anything about do the same. Wherever did you even get that idea?

 

[AlteredEgo]

You are right, I misunderstood. I always thought size queens were women who preferred to have sex with men who have larger penises, not women who just enjoyed looking at them. I suppose I am a size queen, too, then. I also like looking at large penises. By your definition, I am a size queen who does not prefer to have sex with large penises.

Liking the appearance of large penises is completely unrelated to enjoying sex with one. You don't seem to understand female sexual satisfaction and the reasons why a woman would or wouldn't prefer a larger penis at all.

I agree with you on another point. I also don't desire to continue this discussion. You are not fun to discuss this issue with.

It's his fault, he's misusing the phrase.

 

[gunnaknow]

You are right, I misunderstood. I always thought size queens were women who preferred to have sex with men who have larger penises, not women who just enjoyed looking at them.

I didn't just say size queen. I said size queens, in the aesthetic sense. Things are never black and white. There are many psychological layers that go into decision making and judgments. One woman can absolutely need a big penis in order to gain enough physical stimulation but may not find them anymore visually attractive than the average woman. While another woman may be completely the opposite and be completely obsessed and hung up on the looks while being no more physically stimulated by a big penis than the average woman. There are many more variables that go into it than just that and things are only relative, not absolute. Just as the day time seemlessly moves into night time and there is no such thing as absolute day and absolute night. If that is too difficult for you to get your head around, then I'll use different terms for you. Very attractive women might statistically be more likely to judge big penises as more visually important than the average woman would.

Liking the appearance of large penises is completely unrelated to enjoying sex with one. You don't seem to understand female sexual satisfaction and the reasons why a woman would or wouldn't prefer a larger penis at all.

As I said, there are many variables that go into it and there are no absolutes. If a woman likes the look of a big penis then she is probably more likely to enjoy sex with it. Therefore, if she is a size queen in the aesthetic sense, then she is probably statistically more likely to be a size queen in a more general sense. However, I was talking only of the aesthetic sense because one cannot extrapolate that she will necessarily be a size queen in the general sense just because she is in the aesthetic sense.

I agree with you on another point. I also don't desire to continue this discussion. You are not fun to discuss this issue with.

I'm glad that we agree on something for a change. Although I find that it is you who is not fun and who has been unfriendly and blunt from the very beginning. Don't be suprised if more conversations that you have with people end up like this. Good day to you.

 

[gunnaknow]

It's his fault, he's misusing the phrase.

I didn't use the phrase by itself, it was put into a context of aesthetics. There can be no complaints. If people then wish to take it out of the context in which it was put, then ofcourse there is going to be misunderstanding.

 

[dolfette]

what a silly thread.

 

[gunnaknow]

what a silly thread.

Is there some reason why you chose to say that straight after my post? In another thread you chose to post this below, straight after I had posted also.

there are some amusingly stupid posts in this thread.

Is this a coincidence or are you trying to say something about what I have written in particular? If so then please say so directly to me rather than through subterfuge. Thankyou.

 

[dolfette]

Is there some reason why you chose to say that straight after my post? In another thread you chose to post this below, straight after I had posted also.

Is this a coincidence or are you trying to say something about what I have written in particular? If so then please say so directly to me rather than through subterfuge. Thankyou.

it was mere coincidence.
but this post is directly to you.

*ahem*

paranoid! paranoid! neener neener neener!

 

[gunnaknow]

it was mere coincidence.
but this post is directly to you.

*ahem*

paranoid! paranoid! neener neener neener!

:biggrin1:

cool

 

[petite]

I'm glad that we agree on something for a change. Although I find that it is you who is not fun and who has been unfriendly and blunt from the very beginning. Don't be suprised if more conversations that you have with people end up like this. Good day to you.

You're reading unfriendliness where there isn't any. Very few people on LPSG react the way that you do to me. I have over a 1,000 posts and most of my discussions do not end up like this.

You are awfully quick to jump down people's throats.

I understand that you dislike that I pointed out what I consider to be logical flaws in your arguments, but it was you who responded in a way that I felt was very impolite with you "don't you ever listen" wording. How rude! And after I apologized to you! You lack graciousness.

You are very attached to your theory and obviously don't want to actually discuss them. I thought that since you had posted the same thing in three different threads that you really wanted to talk about your hypothesis, so I did. Now I see that you you weren't seeking opinions from women, just praise?

 

[B_ILIW]

i bet the writer:

- is too dim to realise that people like different things and that everything is relative in life. if s/he is so smart to write for a broadsheet, well their intelligence is misplaced.

- probably is a woman who has always had small wangs, or a man writing under a pseudonym, whose cock is about 2 inches long. :biggrin1::tongue:

From time to time you always get these opinionated and self-righteous rants in the papers from journalists, but it's just them pushing they're own view of life as absolute fact. no different to most other humans then. :wink:

 

[gunnaknow]

You're reading unfriendliness where there isn't any. Very few people on LPSG react the way that you do to me. I have over a 1,000 posts and most of my discussions do not end up like this.

Your behaviour was unfriendly, regardless of what you intended. You should look at improving that.

I understand that you dislike that I pointed out what I consider to be logical flaws in your arguments

I didn't make any arguments or assert any beliefs. I made a proposal that there may be some correlation that could be worth investigating. It is you who made it out as if I thought that it was a theory and asked what proof I had. I don't need proof for what is only a proposed possible correlation.

, but it was you who responded in a way that I felt was very impolite with you "don't you ever listen" wording. How rude!

No, how rude of you not to even have bothered reading what I had written properly before answering. You pointed out points that I hadn't even made and I had to correct you more than once about what I had actually said.

You are very attached to your theory and obviously don't want to actually discuss them.

For the last time, it isn't a theory! It is a proposal. I stated that there might be a correlation, not that there was or even that I thought that there was.

Now I see that you you weren't seeking opinions from women, just praise?

I wasn't seeking any opinions. If opinions were offered, then fine. Unfortunately, you decided to misread everything that I had written and your opinions were therefore beside the point.

I don't have any more time for this. I perhaps have a few months left to live and don't want to waste anymore time on this nonsense. Good day to you.

 

[B_BoysAreToys]

I don't have any more time for this BS. You just twist things to suit your argument. Things that simply never happened. I maybe have a few months to live and really can't waste any more time on this. Good day to you. May this be the last of our discussion.

Wow, what an odd thing to say. If that's the truth, I am truly sorry for you. But what was the point? To make her feel bad about wanting to debate?

Agreed, don't waste time here. Go swimming in the ocean or go skydiving. enjoy the life you have left.

 

[petite]

I wasn't seeking any opinions. If opinions were offered, then fine. Unfortunately, you decided to misread everything that I had written and then question me about what proof I had. I don't need proof for what isn't even a theory or an assertion.

I don't have any more time for this. I perhaps have a few months left to live and don't want to waste anymore time on this nonsense. Good day to you.

If you didn't want any opinions then why did you post the same thing up in three threads on the women's board? No one made you do it.

I didn't "decide" to misread anything and I have the maturity to admit when I've made a mistake and own up to it. You on the other hand can't stop harping on about it. That's what's different about you. Other people let it drop and move on with the rest of the discussion. Misunderstandings happen, especially if you discuss a lot, forgive others theirs and they'll do the same, which is what I do when someone misunderstands something I've written and I explain it again politely. You act like you've never had a pleasant online communication before.

Regardless, of my own errors, I stand by my opinion that you are putting way too much stake in your "proposal" because I don't feel that women choose sexual partners the way that you seem to think they do, but you aren't interested in women's opinions anyway.

I'm sorry that you only have a few months to live. Why don't you go out and do something else other than complain that I made a mistake that I've already apologized to you for?

 

[gunnaknow]

Seeing as I don't have the time left to continue discussing how woefully incorrect and twisted your arguments are, I will let you have the last, nonsensical word. To answer your question, I can't go out because my lungs are failing. It's no big deal, we're all slowly dieing.

 

[petite]

My sincerest condolences. I hope there's some way for you to pull through.

 

[gunnaknow]

Thankyou. The body and mind may "die" but we have always been the consciousness pervading all forms, so have nothing to worry about.

 

[dolph9plus]

This article isn't about human females. It's about gorillas.

There isn't a single sentence supporting the premise that human females are obsessed with penis size in the entire article. They just gave the article a sensational headline so people would want to read it.

Agreed,,Just a flashy way to catch us. Bait and switch ,lol

But im a firm believer that most women although not obsessed with HUGE size,they do have a size preference that they like,and are dissapointed when it is not met.

like the perfect guy in every way,and then you get him naked and he has a 4 inch pencil dick..might not be a deal breaker,but prob wont do much for you in the bedroom..

And if the bedroom isnt important to women, then whats the point of even having a bf?