Why are so many american cocks cut?

JohnDoeXXXm

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 12, 2007
Posts
2,246
Media
0
Likes
2,404
Points
443
Location
Houston, TX, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Male
I think it's a combination of alot of things:

Judeo-Christian reasons (circumcision as part of religious tradition) cosmetic reasons (clean and tidy), perhaps advanced medicne (avoid tight foreskin by removing it as a baby when pain won't be the same issue as an adult...) and to be different from europeans (after all, the colonies revolted from British ways...) and my guess for the biggest reason:

mothers who wanted their young boys to stop touching themselves so much- make it easier to clean and it won't get rubbed so much.

I think the tide is turning men- and it's about damn time.
 

80deezel

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Posts
190
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
103
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I think its religious reasoning but im still mad they cut too much off.
 

B_Nick8

Cherished Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Posts
11,402
Media
0
Likes
305
Points
208
Location
New York City, by way of Marblehead, Boston and Ge
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
is it to do with high number of jews or what?

Oh, fuck you. I'm as WASP as they come. Perhaps it's just an American thing, done with some ridiculous idea about hygiene or something. Google it and you'll get the whole history of circumcison if you're looking for it. I don't even know why people even start these threads. Forget about it. No one else is interested, although apparently you are. Blah, blah, blah. Cut.
 
Last edited:

jdoe86

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Posts
3,345
Media
177
Likes
4,026
Points
693
Location
Sunnyvale (California, United States)
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Male
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), global estimates suggest that 30% of males are circumcised, of whom 68% are Muslim. In the United States, the amount of males who are circumcised varies in different parts of the country. Religion really has not as much to do with it as you are lead to believe. Before you jump to conclusions, Google it and you'll see a lot of statistics and information on the subject. That way you don't come across as an asshole or racist.
 

B_josh762

Experimental Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Posts
391
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
103
Location
In the midwest
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
Uncut and live in the lower midwest. My father, brothers, myself and my son uncut. Dr.'s said one should be cir'd because it is cleaner. Not to mention the extra big bucks they have made over the years clipping foreskin off. Glad my parents thought it was barbaric to do so.
 

jdoe86

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Posts
3,345
Media
177
Likes
4,026
Points
693
Location
Sunnyvale (California, United States)
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Male
I've had some women who tell me they rather have cut cocks because they look better. Now just to let you know, I'd say 7 out of 10 prefer cut to uncut, but that's a unscientific survey of past lovers. And these are women from ever race, religion and from all over the world. One girl who I was with for a few years told me I was the first cut guy she had ever had. She'd had maybe 40 or 50 guys before me and thought my cock was "beautiful". Out of the guys I'd been with, I can recall maybe 60% were cut.
 
3

337132

Guest
only sick subhumans would do that these days! dont disable penis, a cuted penis is a disabled cock! im not cutted. the foreskin saves and prevents penis from injuries, its an important part of a penis, its normaly to have a noncuted cock. jews had to do it coz they must cut their cocks if they really love god so it was like a faith test... buttoday, whoever recommends it should be burned alive, cutted cocks maybe dont have infections but they also lose sensitivity when u suckin ur cock, a cutted cock cant be so good as uncuted, and it isnt cleaner at all, with an uncuted cock u can be clean like with a circumcised..

these ***** make mad whoch recommend that old tradition barbarien ritual of cockcuting, we dont have to do that, normal humans dont do that
 

B_Morning_Glory

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Posts
1,855
Media
0
Likes
30
Points
183
Location
lucasville, ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
only sick subhumans would do that these days! dont disable penis, a cuted penis is a disabled cock! im not cutted. the foreskin saves and prevents penis from injuries, its an important part of a penis, its normaly to have a noncuted cock. jews had to do it coz they must cut their cocks if they really love god so it was like a faith test... buttoday, whoever recommends it should be burned alive, cutted cocks maybe dont have infections but they also lose sensitivity when u suckin ur cock, a cutted cock cant be so good as uncuted, and it isnt cleaner at all, with an uncuted cock u can be clean like with a circumcised..

these ***** make mad which recommend that old tradition barbarien ritual of cockcuting, we dont have to do that, normal humans dont do that

you seem to be very mixed up in your info, here as a cut cock is not a disabled cock by any means. also as for the sensitivity this will vary from guy to guy as my hubby hasn't lost any sensitive and he has been cut for 12 yrs now . and as for your thinking a cut cock isn't as good as a uncut cock how would you know this for sure fact? the only ones who can truthfully say this is the guys who have had a foreskin and gotten cut as an adult. and even then you will get mixed answers on this as well do to many things. and from my experience with both cut and uncut i can say it is my opinion that you are wrong but some women like uncut so there again it depends on the preference of the person. you dont know anymore about a cut cock and how it feels and or how good it is than a cut guy knows about foreskin if he hasn't had one. even i dont know everything about cut and uncut cocks except what experiences i have had with them over time. and what my friends have told me about it after some of them have gotten cut latter. so i wouldn't be saying someones cock is useless so to speak just because they happen to be or get circumcised . any more than a cut guy should be saying the same about uncut guys, it depends on the guy and the women as to which is better, and there will never be an agreement on this as each has their preference and reasons for that preference and all are diffrent.
 

GeorgiaRick

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2005
Posts
20
Media
0
Likes
8
Points
223
Location
Augusta
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I agree. I was cut at birth but made sure my sons kept their skins. It is barbaric to chop it off
Uncut and live in the lower midwest. My father, brothers, myself and my son uncut. Dr.'s said one should be cir'd because it is cleaner. Not to mention the extra big bucks they have made over the years clipping foreskin off. Glad my parents thought it was barbaric to do so.
 

Riven650

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Posts
1,599
Media
3
Likes
99
Points
268
Location
Norfolk UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
you seem to be very mixed up in your info, here as a cut cock is not a disabled cock by any means. also as for the sensitivity this will vary from guy to guy as my hubby hasn't lost any sensitive and he has been cut for 12 yrs now . and as for your thinking a cut cock isn't as good as a uncut cock how would you know this for sure fact? the only ones who can truthfully say this is the guys who have had a foreskin and gotten cut as an adult. .............

I was circumcised at age 30. I'm now 53 and I can tell you that I didn't lose any sensitivity along with my foreskin.

I think it's widespread in the USA because, (A) it's traditional, and (B) as another poster said, the doctors make money out of it - so sure they're going to recommend it.

Circumcision has lost popularity here in the UK in recent years. When I was a kid I was surprised to see how many boys had been cut. But the National Health Service is not a commercial organisation and it's policy of not doing unnecessary procedures was extended to the point where doctors stopped doing circumcision unless it was necessary (due to phimosis, etc.). These days if a parent takes a boy to the family doctor and asks about circumcision, the vast majority of doctors would advise them to leave it alone. It's unnecessary, and it's a trauma to the child.
 

B_Morning_Glory

Sexy Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2007
Posts
1,855
Media
0
Likes
30
Points
183
Location
lucasville, ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
I was circumcised at age 30. I'm now 53 and I can tell you that I didn't lose any sensitivity along with my foreskin.

I think it's widespread in the USA because, (A) it's traditional, and (B) as another poster said, the doctors make money out of it - so sure they're going to recommend it.

Circumcision has lost popularity here in the UK in recent years. When I was a kid I was surprised to see how many boys had been cut. But the National Health Service is not a commercial organization and it's policy of not doing unnecessary procedures was extended to the point where doctors stopped doing circumcision unless it was necessary (due to phimosis, etc.). These days if a parent takes a boy to the family doctor and asks about circumcision, the vast majority of doctors would advise them to leave it alone. It's unnecessary, and it's a trauma to the child.


to be honest here all the guys i know who have gotten cut as adults haven't lost any sensitivity from it that i know of least they didn't act like it LOL. but seeing as i dont have a cock i can only quote how it pertains to me and from the guys who have had it done tell me. and all that i know tell my good things about it so seeing as its my preference for a nice girthy cut cock i have no choice but to believe them. :wink: