Outstanding article.
No mention of the Clinton Administration. Odd.
Outstanding article.
No mention of the Clinton Administration. Odd.
He had the chance to take Bin Ladin out multiple times, but passed.
I forget, which branch of the military did Clinton serve?
Outstanding article.
No mention of the Clinton Administration. Odd.
He had the chance to take Bin Ladin out multiple times, but passed.
I forget, which branch of the military did Clinton serve?
We should sit down and have coffee and doughnuts with Al-Queda and the Taliban.
That will work. Just ask Barry.
Honestly, why do you guys even dignify his shit with a reply? It's plainly apparent he's not the least bit interested in intellectually honest dialogue...so why feed it at all?
Outstanding article.
No mention of the Clinton Administration. Odd.
He had the chance to take Bin Ladin out multiple times, but passed.
I forget, which branch of the military did Clinton serve?
We should sit down and have coffee and doughnuts with Al-Queda and the Taliban.
That will work. Just ask Barry.
3. Diverting it to Clinton is Neo-Con tactic #1, failure on you sir.
obvious lib tactic to foreclose discussion -- possibly because of an Achilles heel to be found upon the review of any lib dem Presidency?
4. Having talks with enemies is not a bad thing armchair general. It's the right thing to do.
yeah, Just ask Neville (oh, and somebody please hand Obama a black umbrella to complete the picture)
You mean as opposed to the distinguished service records of Geo. Bush and Dick Cheney?