Why do cowards promote war and defend torture?

D

deleted15807

Guest
It is shocking not a single interviewer doesn't call him on his record. Of course we know the answer, retaliation. The corporate masters that run the world would fire anyone who did that on camera a la Dan Rather.
 

B_starinvestor

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Posts
4,383
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Location
Midwest
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Outstanding article.

No mention of the Clinton Administration. Odd.

He had the chance to take Bin Ladin out multiple times, but passed.

I forget, which branch of the military did Clinton serve?

We should sit down and have coffee and doughnuts with Al-Queda and the Taliban.

That will work. Just ask Barry.
 

B_Nick8

Cherished Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2007
Posts
11,402
Media
0
Likes
301
Points
208
Location
New York City, by way of Marblehead, Boston and Ge
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
Outstanding article.

No mention of the Clinton Administration. Odd.

He had the chance to take Bin Ladin out multiple times, but passed.

I forget, which branch of the military did Clinton serve?

You mean as opposed to the distinguished service records of Geo. Bush and Dick Cheney?
 

B_VinylBoy

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2007
Posts
10,363
Media
0
Likes
68
Points
123
Location
Boston, MA / New York, NY
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Outstanding article.

No mention of the Clinton Administration. Odd.

He had the chance to take Bin Ladin out multiple times, but passed.

I forget, which branch of the military did Clinton serve?

We should sit down and have coffee and doughnuts with Al-Queda and the Taliban.

That will work. Just ask Barry.

When it comes to the war, all eyes are on CHENEY.
That bastard had a hard on for Iraq and Saddam going back as far as Bush I. Mentioning anyone or anything else is a diversionary tactic to not focus on the person who's REALLY responsible.

So no... we won't mention Clinton. We won't obsess over what Nancy Pelosi was told. Let's focus on the REAL issue here.
 

Zeuhl34

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Posts
2,027
Media
19
Likes
145
Points
208
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Honestly, why do you guys even dignify his shit with a reply? It's plainly apparent he's not the least bit interested in intellectually honest dialogue...so why feed it at all?

Because arguing with people like that can be simultaneously very fun and terribly aggravating, with both feelings stemming from the other party's (in this case referring generally to people in a conversation/argument) refusal to even attempt anything intellectual.
 

MercyfulFate

Experimental Member
Joined
May 13, 2009
Posts
1,177
Media
23
Likes
21
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Outstanding article.

No mention of the Clinton Administration. Odd.

He had the chance to take Bin Ladin out multiple times, but passed.

I forget, which branch of the military did Clinton serve?

We should sit down and have coffee and doughnuts with Al-Queda and the Taliban.

That will work. Just ask Barry.

1. Bin Laden is a nobody, just a scapegoat for the US government.

2. Al Qaeda is NOT some organized super terrorist organization, they're nobodies built into SATAN so the US Government has an external enemy to fight.

3. Diverting it to Clinton is Neo-Con tactic #1, failure on you sir.

4. Having talks with enemies is not a bad thing armchair general. It's the right thing to do.
 

B_Nick4444

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2007
Posts
6,849
Media
0
Likes
106
Points
193
Location
San Antonio, TX
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
3. Diverting it to Clinton is Neo-Con tactic #1, failure on you sir.

obvious lib tactic to foreclose discussion -- possibly because of an Achilles heel to be found upon the review of any lib dem Presidency?

4. Having talks with enemies is not a bad thing armchair general. It's the right thing to do.


yeah, Just ask Neville (oh, and somebody please hand Obama a black umbrella to complete the picture)
 

MercyfulFate

Experimental Member
Joined
May 13, 2009
Posts
1,177
Media
23
Likes
21
Points
123
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
yeah, Just ask Neville (oh, and somebody please hand Obama a black umbrella to complete the picture)

Calling someone a liberal when their not? Neo-Con tactic #2.

Because someone doesn't agree with your distorted, and fed to you worldview does not make them a liberal.

This ignorant "Red vs Blue, Left vs Right" dichotomy belief is so....ugh. There's more than 2 belief systems in the world, and I ascribe to neither.
 

B_starinvestor

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2006
Posts
4,383
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
183
Location
Midwest
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
You mean as opposed to the distinguished service records of Geo. Bush and Dick Cheney?

I agree; but there have been numerous presidents with no military experience that have waged military conflicts.

Bush was recent but he has a lot of company.

Obama has no military experience, yet he deployed more troops to Afghan.

Does the OP really want to establish a precedent in which the President cannot wage war unless he/she has served in the military?

Its a ridiculous notion and a bogus OP.