- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
- Posts
- 1,737
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 544
- Points
- 113
- Location
- New York (United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
If the ideas being expressed are dumb or simply unreasonable, why is it necessary to prohibit the expression of such? Do such liberals feel the need to control what others can read and hear? Is it not because such liberals view themselves to be more "enlightened" than everyone else and are uniquely qualified to arbitrarily determine what ideas can and cannot be expressed? Where is the tolerance and inclusion that liberals claim to care so much about? The whole concept of tolerance is that one can "tolerate" the expression of another's bad idea without denying that person their right to express it. Do you really want someone else deciding for you what ideas you may hear? Should we be a community wherein only popular ideas can be expressed?