Why do think transsexual porn is so popular amongst strictly "hetero" men?

[B_johnschlong]

Now assuming all of the above is true (which I'm still not buying) how exactly do you come to the conclusion that these men are straight?

We can't possibly discuss the topic at hand when the topic itself is based on information so easily dismissed at false.

It is not so easily dismissed as false, because I proved you wrong on the popularity of trans websites.

Now, since we have established that fact, which you thought could not be established, I'll try to find a way how we can establish the fact that the visitors of these hugely popular websites are heterosexual men.

 

[B_johnschlong]

assuming all the above is true (which I'm still not buying)

You can check it out for yourself. I've given you the tools.

If you have decided after your own research that, indeed, transsexual websites are highly popular, let me know, then we can tackle the next step.

I have no problem with anyone questioning the premisses on which this topic is based. But I thought they were common knowledge, and I expected to see a debate about the matter I wanted to address, namely the psychology behind heterosexual men's fascination for transsexuality.

 

[B_johnschlong]

Well then, I shall sit here quietly awaiting the floods of straight men to come and back you up, until then I will continue to believe you're talking out of your ass since this is now page 3 and they've still not arrived

Well, this proves my point a bit, I think. Given the serious taboo surrounding the topic, this comes as no surprise. Most hetero-men don't like to admit they're watching this type of pornography - probably for some of the reasons I've set out in the opening post! :biggrin1: And we know the category is hugely popular amongst hetero men.

So why don't they turn up? That's precisely a matter that is tightly linked to the questions asked in the first post!

Besides, when you deal with heterosexual men who visit a website about big penises, this should come even less as a surprise!

 

[B_johnschlong]

I do not dispute they are highly populated, I've not once disputed that and any prick on the planet can see that they are. I dispute that they are highly populated by hetrosexual men, and this needs addressing before the topic you wish to discuss even becomes a topic.

If you can not prove that they are highly populated by straight men, then your question becomes void since it is based on a theory which very few are going to buy without proof.

Ok, may I ask you the simple question: do you think these highly popular websites are visited more by men than by women?

Just to make sure about this first.

 

[Onslow]

Man, get over it. Sexual psychology is not your thing. Nobody cares. To each his own interests. No biggie, really.

You don't say?! (Are you taking your meds as prescribed?)

You sure you're not related to JQBlonde?

.

They're actually identical twins from the planet Poopityhead.

Ok, as I said: I know first hand that its one of the most popular categories in the online DVD adult business. I can't disclose this information. But I'm telling you it is.

The best I can do is to show you the comparison of hugely popular hetero websites, versus transsexual websites.



Now I can't prove that most of these visitors are male; but do you think they are female? Or transsexual (a group of people of which there are only a few hundred thousand on this planet)?

No, so let's assume they're men, shall we?

Now are they hetero or gay men? I can't prove this either, or not for the Alexa traffic rankings, that is. But I tell you that in the online DVD rental business, they consistently are. We know this from very straightforward parameters.


Ok, and now I'd like to get to the topic at hand. Thanks.

So let's see--you know this but can't say how or disclose the alleged information--but you know it's true, why? Oh--right! Because you say so, Yeah that sells it for me.

The fact that this thread doesn't get off the ground, clearly proves the point I'm trying to make, though. Sexuality is far more complex than we think, and the fluidity or hybridity of desire is threatening to most people. :biggrin1:

That in itself is quite interesting.

The thread can't get off the ground because you keep starting threads based on nothing more than your delusions--and nobody really wants to be baited by it. You're an old trick and a boring one at that wormboy.

I do not dispute they are highly populated, I've not once disputed that and any prick on the planet can see that they are. I dispute that they are highly populated by hetrosexual men, and this needs addressing before the topic you wish to discuss even becomes a topic.

If you can not prove that they are highly populated by straight men, then your question becomes void since it is based on a theory which very few are going to buy without proof.

He has no proof (but then you already knew that--now head back to that fleshpile you me and Sam and others are in)

 

[B_johnschlong]

I think you're sadly misinformed and greatly confused--and confusing (I point to your theories 2 and 3.

After (very little) digging around I found your past topics (ones you opened threads on).

I found these gems:

Why do black girls get so much wetter?
Indian men are small?
Big German penis with fat knob-the ideal?
Why do girls always go with the drummer?
Asian girls have big penises too

You may wish to explore some of your ideas further--they seem, um, different.

Well, Onslow, since this is a website about big penises, I often discuss the topic of big penises. Yes.

Bizarrely enough, you seem to visit this website only to participate in the "word assiociation" and "three-word game" threads. On a website devoted to big penises... To put it in your words: you seem to be a little bit, ehm, different.

http://www.lpsg.org/search.php?searchid=1403636

So I wonder: who really is the odd one here? :biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1: HILARIOUS, really!

 

[Onslow]

I wonder if I should post this lovely PM Wormboy just sent me--

 

[Onslow]

Well, Onslow, since this is a forum about big penises, I often discuss the topic of big penises. Yes.

Bizarrely enough, you seem to visit this website only to participate in the "word assiociation" and "three word game" threads. On a website devoted to big penises...

http://www.lpsg.org/search.php?searchid=1403636

So I wonder: who really is the odd one here? :biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1: HILARIOUS, really!

Sorry sweetheart--am I allowed to call you that Wormboy? If you looked further into my posts, you'd find I am all over the boards. I have engaged in political debates, disected circumcision (hmmm...poor choice of words I suppose), welcomed newcomers, visited and contribute at the Help Desk, discussed many things--you on the other hand are obsessed with factoids you grabbed from The National Enquirer.

I wonder if I should post this lovely PM Wormboy just sent me--

Yeah I think I will.

 

[B_johnschlong]

I wonder if I should post this lovely PM Wormboy just sent me--

Go ahead please. Or should I post it myself?

Onslow, really, stop being a prick. Go back to your "three-word game" thread. This is obviously the only reason why you visit this website about big penises. :biggrin1: Enough said.

 

[Onslow]

Go ahead please. Or should I post it myself?

Onslow, really, stop being a prick. Go back to your "three-word game" thread. This is obviously the only reason why you visit this website about big penises. :biggrin1: Enough said.

Since you insist--



Hi Onslow,
don't you think it's a bit weak on your part to select only the dirty threads I posted? I have posted on many different topics, serious ones, dirty ones, funny ones.
If debating sexual psychology is not your thing, why don't you just stay out of the discussion and go back to your "word games" thread, which is obviously the one you seem to be visiting most (and that is without being selective, like you were). :biggrin1: If all you have is word games, and nothing more substantial, it would have been nice of you to say so in advance. :wink:
Cheers,





Now about those 'dirty' threads--why do you think they are dirty?

Now back to me--I have also started some topics--none in the fun and games by the way--they are:

Birthday
Name My Leg
Congrats on new avatar
Sex abuse and why it kills
Did you notice
And so it really is over
And they claim to be unbiased
Negroponte? Is He Serious?

Onslow has infact posted in most if not all sections here, and in a wide variety of topics, so thats that matter closed.

I would like to make a suggestion which will go some way to clearing up this matter of proof. We have a large % of both gay and straight men here as well as women, I shall go start a poll about their porn preferences and we can continue this once we have gathered some figures :biggrin1:

Now back to this PM? :wink:

Such interest in it I must post it again--for prosperity of course.




Hi Onslow,
don't you think it's a bit weak on your part to select only the dirty threads I posted? I have posted on many different topics, serious ones, dirty ones, funny ones.
If debating sexual psychology is not your thing, why don't you just stay out of the discussion and go back to your "word games" thread, which is obviously the one you seem to be visiting most (and that is without being selective, like you were). :biggrin1: If all you have is word games, and nothing more substantial, it would have been nice of you to say so in advance. :wink:
Cheers,

 

[SpoiledPrincess]

The fact that a website gets x number of visitors proves nothing. I'd expect that the majority of people who visit bmezine aren't into body mods, piercing and the other things the site concentrates on. Quite often people like to look at porn that is outside of their normal sexual experience.

 

[Aplus]

Quite often people like to look at porn that is outside of their normal sexual experience.

I was trying to think of some complex thing to write, but I think you said it all right there. Porn, like all film I suspect, is mostly fantasy and/or curiosity. May not necessarily be any real rhyme or reason to it. Just because someone watches Sly Stallone shoot and kill 50 people, don't mean they have a desire to do so. A lot of people love scary films, but I doubt most have a desire to be scared in their real life. Not trying to say people "never" want to do what they see onscreen, but few things onscreen are ever real. It's all contrived! Ron Jeremy may be able to fuck thousands of women on screen, but I seriously doubt he'd have such success if he wasn't in porn.

From what I can tell, Transexual porn is a very niche market. Unless I'm totally off base, the more successful ones tend to involve real women having sex with transexuals, which really isn't unlike "regular" porn. I suppose if you really "looked" deeper, you could draw some conclusions, but in most cases, I'm not really sure it's gonna mean anything. It's just a film.

 

[CPearl]

I am shocked and hurt to read some of the responses on this thread. I thought this was an open and accepting space...

trans porn is hugely popular, easily outselling all other 'niche' markets. Obviously it's not for everyone. I don't watch it myself, and I AM a trans. But your comments about skin crawling, etc. really hurt. And to mention it in the same sentence with 'men shitting in women's mouths' left me dumfounded...

One could sit all day and try to figure out why a man could be attracted to transsexuals and not come up with a satisfactory answer. Like so much in life, it doesn't make sense on paper. It just is. Are these men actually bisexual? I guess, to a certain extent. However, gay men are not attracted to trannies. You might think they should be, but they aren't. I have been around gay men all my adult life, and none of them has ever hit on me. I wish some of them had!

On the contrary, many of my women friends' husbands have hit on me. Are they repressed? There can't be that many downlows... Why is it so hard to believe that some guys like women and trannies?

Maybe watching trannie porn isn't homosexual suppression or projection - but just getting off on watching beautiful trannies, period.

 

[B_ScaredLittleBoy]

Just because you watch it john doesn't mean everyone else does. I don't watch transsexual porn and I think its pretty disturbing and sick. IMO.

In porn I like there to be a man and a woman. Not an in-betweener.

 

[CPearl]

Ok, so I can totally see your objection, but lets face facts here.. Some people would say the same about watching gay or straight porn it really is nothing personal, its just that some people really don't like watching it, and they should be free to express that opinion. There are things in porn which make my skin crawl, its no reflection on those who watch it, or those who partake in it.

My only objection to this thread (as I hope people can see) is that he's basing it on something he can't possibly prove, like many of his other threads, they are based on nothing more than his desire to make inflamatory threads

Of course, I understand it's not everyone's 'cup of tea', but gently, please...