Why does hillary clinton suck?

[ConanTheBarber]

They are all from today. Her lead over Trump, at the current time, is greater than Obama's was over her at this same time. The "News Media" likes to push a story that will generate ratings, not provide news.

The media has just sucked in this election. But that happens when a candidate is allowed to make Truth his own Tinker Toy.

 

[b.c.]

Game on and challenge accepted:
all those people who think that MG's right-wing diarrhea is great stuff, post approvals in this thread.
Those who don't like/disagree with MG's posts, please feel free to post here as well.

I wish the popcorn icon still existed.

It'll be fun to see if those"I'm not a racist although I often post racist things and often agree with racists" actually have the nerve to post here. I bet she runs off to ask her friends from WND, Breitbart, and other alt right sites to post here.

At least she, unlike other cowards of the right, admits that she is all for tRump.

Just want to say that you know, have your opinion. We get it... you aren't voting for Hillary Clinton. But when one woman calls another woman a "bitch" and a "cunt", I think we all know which of those two women have the problem.

Vote your conscience on November 8th, forgive yourself on November 9th, and then resume a life. Hopefully, a long, healthy, and satisfying one.

Are we speaking of the one who implied that "the bar" need be lowered in order for black actors to get even a token, p.c., nod from the Academy?

 

[StormfrontFL]

So let's get this straight....a percentage polled doesn't represent anything but one or two blacks behaving badly is representative of a whole?

Conserva-racist troll math is fun.

 

[rbkwp]

BIMBO

close enough

lpsg appropriate,yes !!!

and a possible USA Pres i dent 2016 onwards huh'

 

[Drifterwood]

The media has just sucked in this election. But that happens when a candidate is allowed to make Truth his own Tinker Toy.

They say that two things sell, new and free.

Is Hillary able to offer either?

 

[Klingsor]

Hate to break it to you but polling a few hundred, thousand, people and then stating that that is representative of millions of others is not fact. It's a fucking guess at best.

That's how polls work. They're a representative sampling--not perfect or exact, but significantly better than a guess.

Using aggregated poll data, for instance, Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com has predicted the state-by-state winners in the last two presidential elections with 99% accuracy.

If you want to drown out Susan Sarandon trashing Hillary with absurd meaningless polls knock yourself out.

I've nothing against Susan Sarandon, and she makes valid points against Clinton. But statistically, her single opinion is meaningless compared to the polls.

 

[Mercurygirl]

Are we speaking of the one who implied that "the bar" need be lowered in order for black actors to get even a token, p.c., nod from the Academy?

No, that would be black Hollywood who now believe there should be racial quotas in, get this, ART.

Again, affirmative action in art.

One more time, let it sink in ... art.

So let's get this straight....a percentage polled doesn't represent anything but one or two blacks behaving badly is representative of a whole?

Conserva-racist troll math is fun.

Yep, only one or two blacks behaving badly this year. Hell, in Chicago alone only half a black person was shot. Carry on.

That's how polls work. They're a representative sampling--not perfect or exact, but significantly better than a guess.

Using aggregated poll data, for instance, Nate Silver of fivethirtyeight.com has predicted the state-by-state winners in the last two presidential elections with 99% accuracy.



I've nothing against Susan Sarandon, and she makes valid points against Clinton. But statistically, her single opinion is meaningless compared to the polls.

This isn't the last two elections which were far easier to call. Polls have historically been wrong in a number of elections. I don't even know why I'm wasting time arguing this? Fine, take comfort in your polls, they are spot on, I could give a shit to be honest.

What is being overlooked is that a great deal of Trump support is choosing to remain silent. A perfect example of this was last night at Tufts University. Students were invited to watch the debate in the auditorium and afterwards reporters interviewed them as they exited. Many Hillary supporters were happy to talk to the press and publicly express an opinion. Not a single Trump supporter did so. The reason one of them gave? The confrontational radical liberal environment on campus. That's right, this PC SJW fuckery police that the left have created that bully opposing opinions, often times physically, and labels everyone a racist and sexist by default who dare disagree with them.

I know exactly why these people chose not to speak as I just finished up 4 years of the leftist in your face SJW bullshit that has turn me so far away from the moderate left leaning individual I was when I entered college to the conservative right I am today.

When someone asks me who I'm voting for my go to response is, no joke, "Bill Murray". When they follow up, press, with, "No really, who are you voting for." I say, "He was so good in Rushmore, oh, and Caddyshack, classic."

As a rule of personal safety anyone who did come up to me in public, asked who I was voting for, that individual would immediately become suspect and I'd walk as fast and far away from them for fear of being sucker punched by some angry radical feminist. Why? Because I've seen it happen to others.

I've found it is pointless, a complete waste of my time, to have a face to face conversation about politics with this irrational and hysterical new left. I'll do my talking at the polls thank you very much and I think that's true for a lot of conservatives today. The pre-polls can't capture those who won't participate. Come November I think the left is in for a real shock.

 

[Klingsor]

This isn't the last two elections which were far easier to call.

There you're in agreement with Nate Silver himself, who acknowledges that this election is more difficult to forecast than previous ones. My point was about the validity of polling in general--as opposed to guessing or wishful thinking.

What is being overlooked is that a great deal of Trump support is choosing to remain silent . . .

That may be true, though I wonder if it's entirely for the reason you suggest. Even without any threat of repercussion, if I were a Trump supporter, I'm not sure I'd want to admit it . . . even to myself.

 

[Mercurygirl]

That may be true, though I wonder if it's entirely for the reason you suggest. Even without any threat of repercussion, if I were a Trump supporter, I'm not sure I'd want to admit it . . . even to myself.

Funny, I'd feel the same if I were a Clinton supporter.

 

[Drifterwood]

Anyone discussed this yet?

http://europe.newsweek.com/why-clinton-foundation-donations-were-scandal-495008?rm=eu

The Clintons achieve through a "charity" what they couldn't do as private candidates. Cute.

 

[Industrialsize]

Anyone discussed this yet?

http://europe.newsweek.com/why-clinton-foundation-donations-were-scandal-495008?rm=eu

The Clintons achieve through a "charity" what they couldn't do as private candidates. Cute.

I don't know why you have the word Charity in quotes. The Clinton's are guilty of creating a Charity that is well respected and does good works around the world. There is absolutely nothing nefarious about the Clinton Foundation.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680

 

[Drifterwood]

I don't know why you have the word Charity in quotes. The Clinton's are guilty of creating a Charity that is well respected and does good works around the world. There is absolutely nothing nefarious about the Clinton Foundation.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680

You are kidding me?

Is this not reported in the U.S.?

Can you read the articles online?

 

[b.c.]

I don't know why you have the word Charity in quotes. The Clinton's are guilty of creating a Charity that is well respected and does good works around the world. There is absolutely nothing nefarious about the Clinton Foundation.

https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680

Let us not forget that this is the guy who has said people who discuss discrimination and racism are "part of the problem" because we're "allowed too," who has responded to concerns about police misconduct and disparity in law enforcement by invoking black on black crime, and who once argued how it might be logical for someone to tell a black American to "go back to Africa."

 

[Drifterwood]

Let us not forget that this is the guy who has said people who discuss discrimination and racism are "part of the problem" because we're "allowed too," who has responded to concerns about police misconduct and disparity in law enforcement by invoking black on black crime, and who once argued how it might be logical for someone to tell a black American to "go back to Africa."

You are a dumb ass lying fool.

I take your idiocy to prove that you are worried about the corruption of Clinton. I remember your aggression against people who supported Bernie. Does Hillary inspire a new type of Uncle Tom?

You I said are part of the problem and that statement is now clearly correct.

If the Democrats lose, it will be because of people like you.

 

[b.c.]

Well at least you partially admitted to one of the three.

Though for clarity's sake let's not forget that you offered up the words of one Trevor Phillips, a black British politician (not surprisingly) for the purposes of denouncing dialogue about race and racism in GENERAL, which is why your attempt later twist it into a personal condemnation of me in particular doesn't WASH, does it??

https://www.lpsg.com/threads/ferguson.402034/page-48#post-5556168

So, Aside from my typo ("too" instead of "to") what part of the rest was a lie?

Have you NOT tried to offer up black on black crime for the purposes of questioning legitimate concerns about police misconduct and racial disparity in law enforcement? Because I recall having several exchanges with you on that very subject.

And did you not attempt to explain/rationalize how one might logically tell a black person to "go back to Africa" "...if [one] thought that they were acting like an African rather than an American..."

if I recall YOUR words correctly?

https://www.lpsg.com/threads/go-back-to-africa.441164/page-5#post-5906301

 

[b.c.]

Oh, almost forgot. Here's the link to where you introduced black on black crime into a discussion about racial disparity in law enforcement. So now I've provided all three references to what you call a "lie" because, "a link should support your point."

https://www.lpsg.com/threads/ferguson.402034/page-85#post-5694783

 

[Crimsonlurker]

You are a dumb ass lying fool.

I take your idiocy to prove that you are worried about the corruption of Clinton. I remember your aggression against people who supported Bernie. Does Hillary inspire a new type of Uncle Tom?

You I said are part of the problem and that statement is now clearly correct.

If the Democrats lose, it will be because of people like you.

That moment when people have to save every last post you make simply because you lie so much that it becomes a necessity for the purpose of proper discussion. Yes Drifterwood we remember how you continuously tried to lie not only about your own lies but about b.c.. One would think you'd understood exactly how on notice you are but of course....here we are...again.

 

[b.c.]

That moment when people have to save every last post you make simply because you lie so much that it becomes a necessity for the purpose of proper discussion. Yes Drifterwood we remember how you continuously tried to lie not only about your own lies but about b.c.. One would think you'd understood exactly how on notice you are but of course....here we are...again.

The fact that a person who has taken the positions he HAS, could even SUGGEST with a straight face that a black person would have to be an "Uncle Tom" to prefer Hillary over a misogynistic, xenophobic, BIGOT, who only last night tried to suggest that black people would be better off under some nationwide, police state, STOP AND FRISK policy that targets minorities, only shows HIM to be woefully out of touch with issues of concern to US.

Either that or he doesn't give a f--------.

 

[Crimsonlurker]

The fact that a person who has taken the positions he HAS, could even SUGGEST with a straight face that a black person would have to be an "Uncle Tom" to prefer Hillary over a misogynistic, xenophobic, BIGOT, who only last night tried to suggest that black people would be better off under some nationwide, police state, STOP AND FRISK policy that targets minorities, only shows HIM to be woefully out of touch with issues of concern to US.

Either that or he doesn't give a f--------.

I'm thinking both.

 

[Drifterwood]

You are a liar, bc and you are a serious detriment to this forum.

In the interest of decorum, I shall put you and your loud mouthed empty headed friends on ignore again.