I mean I love the guy, and I think he's one of the best performers around. However, his cock just isnt that impressive. They do some crazy camera stuff to make it look huge on film, but when you go to the photos it just doesn't even compare to Kieran. At best he's 7 by 5, more realistically 6.5 by 4.5, judging from some pictures ill post if you want me to. Why is this guy billed as a monster, it just doesnt make sense!
sigh ... porn is a BUSINESS. the whole point is to make all the guys seem like they have huge dongs and all the girls seem like they crave said huge dongs.
secondly, johnny is definitely LONG. not thick but long. no way he is just 6.5. and a pornstar wouldn't be able to become such a famous male talent if he only sported 4.5 girth. many of you guys, having larger penises and all really have no clue about what 4.5 girth looks like. johnny is about 5 girth and about 7.5 length. my cock is at best 4 3/4 girth and i have yet to see a video where he looks thinner than me (granted camera tricks, lighting and angles will play a huge role in making a cock appear bigger than it is)
lastly, anyone with an ounce of knowledge about size and a vast history of watching porn knows johnny is NOT huge. when you see girls constantly struggle with the shorty mac, shane diesel, jack napier's of porn, no way you can see johnny as huge. porn will ALWAYS try to create the illusion for men and women but just because a scene or dvd advertises him as 'huge' doesn't mean most people are actually believing it.
PS; though johnny isn't huge, he is definitely at least big.