why so angry?

[curioustitan]

No need to feel threatened. It seems the thread has gotten a little off topic and I may have actually learned what I had hoped to learn by asking "why so angry?", so I figured I'd try to sum up what I have surmised from the various posts.

1). There is a lot of history on this board with the way men and women interact that I had not taken the time to understand. It is very complex and dynamic and it is not "fair" or even realistic to point fingers at a given gender. There are other threads which are emblematic of this and my post was not really necessary, given the debate going on in other places. My bad.

2) Many of the more active women on this site aren't particularly keen on answering the same silly questions over and over. People don't use the search feature enough and there is plenty of spank worthy content regarding women who love big dicks or hate big dicks and the balance has shifted to where such questions are a non-starter. I can see the point.

3) I characterized many of the women in the Women's Issues forum as hostile (sorry for the use of "cunty") and many have expressed that they are feeling hostile, but they've got meaningful reasons for feeling that way.

4) There are a lot of intelligent women on this board that love to argue.

5) My post wasn't very constructive and I certainly haven't made many friends, but hopefully some of the people here understand that "outsiders" such as myself don't see this board as very open or friendly, and the margin for error, in terms of getting flamed, is slim. I'm not basing this conclusion on the way I've been treated here, as I was the instigator and was mean-spirited and emotional in my original tirade.

Me, too

I am cheerful about a lot of things...

And I can certainly change the avatar...no worries. It was just a random selection.

You certainly didn't have to do that, but I do thank you for the avatar change - but Chuck has had that particular avatar for so long, that it was a little disconcerting to see it as someone else's "face". That was thoughtful of you!

I appreciate your apology for calling us cunty; I also appreciate the sharing of your new conclusions, and the acknowledgment of your part in how we treated you in this thread. Thank you.

I like your username, econocook. I'll bet you would enjoy my after-superbowl soup, made of one lonesome brat, sauerkraut juice, and potato salad.

I had a whole post typed out, and then my computer froze. I just hate it when that happens!

Either way, I was going to say I thought I took it a bit too far on my second post there. After I went back and re-read it It came across a lot more agressive then It needed to be.

While I do agree with Gilette on some points - surely our vaginas don't grand us rock star status - I don't think it's the underlying issue here. I don't want to disregard that I (as I can't speak for the other ladies here) do sometimes respond harsher then nescesairy. And no, that isn't very nice of me. But apart from beeing a lady, I'm also human; I am not perfect, I do get irritated, I do make mistakes. And while that doesn't make it okay, I don't think those imperfections are exclusive the female posters here - as the men do so just as often - I do think we stand out more because we're so greatly outnumbered by the other sex here.

And I don't think it's that weird that people do rub eachother the wrong way here. We are on a erotic forum and on all the forums I've visited surrounding those interests usually will have two types of members; 1.) the person genuinely interested to talk/discuss/explore and learn about the subject and 2.) the person just trying to get off. One isn't better or worse then the other, but surely their motives do conflict at times. Add this on to the blessing and curse of anomiousity of the internet (anyone can be anyone and everything they want to be - sometimes "forgetting" that here is an actual person on the other side of the cute username you were talking to) and you're almost halfway there.

I think we all are to blame in one way or the other, but i for one wouldn't be interested in visiting a forum where there wasn't any room for discussion, asking honest questions and beeing genuinely interested in getting to know each other. I did not come here to serve as anyones wank fodder - I don't think anyone does - and would like to be treated with at least some regard for my feelings. And because of that I might feel the need to speak up when I feel something or someone says something that disregards that - I do, however, need to keep my bitching and clawing to a minimum.

Really, I think we are making this a bit bigger then it needed to be :redface:

Fearful that I may have missed something, I did an arrogant search for my username and found this thread. I don't have anything of substance to add as everything I could have said has already been mentioned or resolved. I just wanted to say thank you to the ladies who spoke so kindly of myself and others. It's very nice of you. I was going to speak a little about the 'white knight' issue, but I'll make a new thread instead.

Oh no need to worry. After rereading my first response I thought maybe I came off as a little kiss-assish (hey, my first made up word). But I did agree with what you posted. And I should apologize if my second post came off as curt. I really do not like posting on the internet much because I think it's easier to communicate with people when you can see their faces or even over a phone and can hear inflections in voices. I am really more of a face-to-face person.

So, no bothers on this end whatsoever. I do get sick of these "penis size" threads though. I imagine going to a church site sometime and seeing priests and nuns discussing penis size.

And like a dumbass I forget you really do have a verifiable female club section. I go to a lot of forums for a lot of different subjects to unwind before hitting the sack so I have trouble keeping up with what's what.

But I do have to agree with the sticky thread "Your penis is not a woman's issue". It never has been and shouldn't be. They're attached to men. Just sometimes the balls are held by the woman, LOL.

Basically you got what you got. It's up to the man on whether he uses it or not, not a popular vote.

But one cool thing about this or any forum are all the different viewpoints.

And sorry for going off topic again. That is all...

Kumbaya with Thomas and Catherine from christiananderson

 

[curioustitan]

To the OP.....
And for all the 'cunty' women of LPSG....
This one's for you!

YouTube - Christina Aguilera - Can't Hold Us Down

 

[D_Leonna Javelincatcher]

Thanks for the apology but more importantly the recap. I have a Masters Degree and I couldn't figure out what the hell we were discussing on this thread.

Renee

No need to feel threatened. It seems the thread has gotten a little off topic and I may have actually learned what I had hoped to learn by asking "why so angry?", so I figured I'd try to sum up what I have surmised from the various posts.

1). There is a lot of history on this board with the way men and women interact that I had not taken the time to understand. It is very complex and dynamic and it is not "fair" or even realistic to point fingers at a given gender. There are other threads which are emblematic of this and my post was not really necessary, given the debate going on in other places. My bad.

2) Many of the more active women on this site aren't particularly keen on answering the same silly questions over and over. People don't use the search feature enough and there is plenty of spank worthy content regarding women who love big dicks or hate big dicks and the balance has shifted to where such questions are a non-starter. I can see the point.

3) I characterized many of the women in the Women's Issues forum as hostile (sorry for the use of "cunty") and many have expressed that they are feeling hostile, but they've got meaningful reasons for feeling that way.

4) There are a lot of intelligent women on this board that love to argue.

5) My post wasn't very constructive and I certainly haven't made many friends, but hopefully some of the people here understand that "outsiders" such as myself don't see this board as very open or friendly, and the margin for error, in terms of getting flamed, is slim. I'm not basing this conclusion on the way I've been treated here, as I was the instigator and was mean-spirited and emotional in my original tirade.

 

[rembrandt1603]

From a quick read of the thread, I've managed to glean the following:

Certain posters (women) complain about being dogged for camming, picture trading and otherwise, and they lament how 'they aren't here for that'. It's simply a wonder how so many men on a big cock site come to such a conclusion when the women in question have pictures of their spread twat and rack on their profile galleries.

Not that I'm denying that it happens completely unwarranted, though don't hang your meat in the window if it ain't for sale.

 

[AlteredEgo]

From a quick read of the thread, I've managed to glean the following:

Certain posters (women) complain about being dogged for camming, picture trading and otherwise, and they lament how 'they aren't here for that'. It's simply a wonder how so many men on a big cock site come to such a conclusion when the women in question have pictures of their spread twat and rack on their profile galleries.

Not that I'm denying that it happens completely unwarranted, though don't hang your meat in the window if it ain't for sale.

There is nothing but food in my gallery. When it was full of pictures of me, they were all PG13. No nudity. Well, okay, one nude, but no private parts showing. I still had the same problem. I also got some really nasty messages from gay men who were angry about a woman having any pictures of herself in the galleries on a penis website. One of those was so incredibly frightening that I broke the site rules at the time, and created this account. That's why there's nothing but pastry in there now, and why I have such a gender-neutral name. That's why my gender isn't listed on my profile.

Nonetheless, even if I had a gallery full of amateur porn, I would not deserve to be treated like an object. The fact that a woman is sexy enough to turn a man on doesn't negate the fact that she doesn't owe him any contact, doesn't owe him any satisfaction, and doesn't owe him so much as the time of day. Your assertion is ridiculous on its face. No one is complaining about requests being made, they're complaining about requests continuing to be made, more and more aggressively, less and less respectfully after they have already denied an initial request.

 

[luka82]

Nonetheless, even if I had a gallery full of amateur porn, I would not deserve to be treated like an object. The fact that a woman is sexy enough to turn a man on doesn't negate the fact that she doesn't owe him any contact, doesn't owe him any satisfaction, and doesn't owe him so much as the time of day. Your assertion is ridiculous on its face. No one is complaining about requests being made, they're complaining about requests continuing to be made, more and more aggressively, less and less respectfully after they have already denied an initial request.

Yup!
Long story short. My friend was just recently walking down the street, she was going to a her aerobics or something class. She was wearing her tight sweat suit and listening to music. At one point she felt an arm grabbing her behind, she screamed, looked behind and saw a guy. Then she screamed-What the fuck are you doing, asshole! (This is a really bad translation, it was more colorful in Serbian). He said-You are walking like you want it! And he ran away! She called me, crying for half an hour.

 

[Opalite]

From a quick read of the thread, I've managed to glean the following:

Certain posters (women) complain about being dogged for camming, picture trading and otherwise, and they lament how 'they aren't here for that'. It's simply a wonder how so many men on a big cock site come to such a conclusion when the women in question have pictures of their spread twat and rack on their profile galleries.

Not that I'm denying that it happens completely unwarranted, though don't hang your meat in the window if it ain't for sale.

And I DO tick all of the boxes. Though, I find your reasoning very offensive.

Just because I have some pictures in a gallery does not make me a free-for-all. I post these pictures because I want to do so, because I feel comfortable in my own skin. And for the non-private part I do not mind for anyone to see them, and won't flame anyone for doing so. And yes, I'm mainly on this site for some of the friendships I have build and the nice conversations I have had - but that does not mean I'm not a regular human beeing, that does not make me a-sexual; I do (and many here with me) flirt at times and am at times looking for more then just talking about the weather. I do like gto talk about' and explore.

What I don't like is the assumption just because I do have some pictures up on my profile, I'm everyones free pornstar/callgirl/webcamgirl. My "meat" is not for "sale" - I'm neither a meat nor an object. I'm not just on here to serve anyone that would dare to demand so, I have the right to be treated with some regard to my feelings, or at least as a human beeing. I have the right to decide who I am and am not attracted to. I have the right my own opinions and values. Not just because I happen to be female, as men should have the same rights.

Just because this is an erotic website does not mean we signed off on those rights.

 

[maxcok]

Preface:

Actually, I remember MoT arguing against a white knight accusation recently, although I can't remember exactly what he said. I remember it happening because I was about to argue against it, he just got in first.

I guess I should have written, "I wish I said..." or, "It's so rarely said..." rather than say that no one says it. I remember that Maxcock didn't take the accusation lying down, either. They were great! :biggrin1:

It was indeed highly entertaining :biggrin1::tongue:

I don't remember what the thread was, but it was the same one, I believe, in which I was accused of being a white knight.

Well, I was going to stay out of this fray, but since I'm being talked about and the thread is taking a typical downward spiral, I feel obliged to ride in. If you want a trip down memory lane, the dubbing of "white knights" in the thread mentioned starts here (#73), things really start to pick up around here (#87) which is immediately followed by thickrod's link to the white knight cartoon (#88), culminating in Sir Maxcok and Sir Thunder heroically joining forces here (#99), followed by much heraldry and revelry, beautifully illustrated. :wink:

On the whole "white knight" phenomenon, I had actually never heard that particular internet parlance until that thread, so it was a totally foreign concept to me. Referring back to what Petite said earlier, I don't stick up for anyone to curry favor. I do it because I think they're being treated unfairly or to take a moral/ethical stand. If that's a "white knight" fine, I'll gladly accept that moniker.

Related to that, I really don't understand the whole phenomenon of people (mostly guys, I think) getting off sexually to the comments random strangers make to them on the internet, people they have no hope of ever meeting IRL. Not that there's anything wrong with that, I do my own share of flirting after all, but it's all in fun. I guess I just don't relate to vicarious fantasy cybersex so far removed from flesh and blood reality. Presumably that's the reward for being an internet "white knight" as I understand it? If so, I'm totally missing out. :boggled:

Truth be told, I do a lot more reading than posting in the Women's Issues forum. This site is naturally dominated by men, and with dicks as the presumed focus, the macho swagger (and parallel male insecurities) are only that much more exaggerated. I figure women have to deal with male dominance enough and listen to male opinions aplenty, both here and IRL. I learned a long time ago if you give women space to express themselves freely, they come out with some pretty interesting and sometimes enlightening points of view, and giving them 'space' is mostly what I do when I visit this sub forum. If more men would just shut up and listen, maybe they might understand women a little better and stop thinking they're "crazy" or "bitchy" just because they don't always see things from a male-centric or phallic-centric point of view.

Truth be told, though I am a "feminist" in the broad sense, I also come from the old school of southern gentlemanly etiquette where I was taught to respect women and show them special consideration. This may irk some of my most hardcore feminist acquaintances, but even in this age I think women in general deserve a little deference in balancing the equality scales. That doesn't mean they're allowed to get away with pulling any kind of shit they want, and I will especially call them out if they use their gender as an excuse. But like it or not, I'll still open the door for them.

There are forums all over this site where men can show off, talk about their dicks, and try to get people to comment on them. Matter of fact, a good portion of the posts are thinly disguised to do just that, though on the surface they may pretend to be talking about something else. The numerous "XL condom" threads, for one example, are classic. lol. If the women want to talk about dicks, they're really not hard to find here. I don't see a problem at all, nor is it in the least "dictatorial" imo, if the women have their own forum dedicated to issues of special concern to them, sexual or otherwise. Any guy who doesn't understand that forcing his penis or his overbearing opinions into the WI forum is just plain obnoxious, could bear a little self-reflection. Meantime, he's a clod and an idiot imho, and he deserves whatever he gets in response.

Speaking to the fellas directly: I have no doubt that many of you who complain that there aren't enough women, or enough quality women, participating in this site are the same ones who come barging into the WI forum and try to make it all about you and/or your penis. Get a clue. Without this special feminized corner, there would undoubtedly be fewer women and fewer quality women participating on the site. Your self-obsessed attitudes are self-defeating and only serve to drive them off. Reflect on this: Your penis is just fine. Thinking the universe revolves around it or you is obsessive and immature, not the best way to attract women. Why don't you try respecting them and developing an interest in them as people and see where that gets you?

I've been impressed by the intelligence, thoughtfulness, openmindedness, and good humor displayed by many of the women here. As well, I've been impressed by their spunk. So what if they stick together sometimes? They're vastly outnumbered for starters. And the way some guys come blustering in here with their complaining know-it-all attitudes putting down the entire gender, it's no wonder women react defensively. Funny how it's only the women who are called "bitchy" or "cunty" in those circumstances, isn't it?

I see a whole lot of fellas here who could benefit from learning that despite their own phallic obsessions, their wee-wees and the size of their wee-wees rank pretty far down the list of things that are important to most women, or even interest most women, hardcore "size queens" notwithstanding. Even there, I think it's relative to other qualities. Likewise, there are a whole lot of fellas who could benefit from developing a genuine interest in women as the complex, fascinating creatures they are, instead of just people with breasts to be pandered to on the way to that warm juicy hole. Wouldn't it be great if we could all stop dividing ourselves into men and women, gay, straight, bi, confused, etc., and just relate as people? Imagine what we might learn about each other. And ourselves.

* Sir Maxcok mounts his noble steed and rides away, if not ramrod straight, sitting fully erect * :wink:

 

[helgaleena]

From a quick read of the thread, I've managed to glean the following:

Certain posters (women) complain about being dogged for camming, picture trading and otherwise, and they lament how 'they aren't here for that'. It's simply a wonder how so many men on a big cock site come to such a conclusion when the women in question have pictures of their spread twat and rack on their profile galleries.

Not that I'm denying that it happens completely unwarranted, though don't hang your meat in the window if it ain't for sale.

For sale? You cannot afford it.

 

[helgaleena]

Yup!
Long story short. My friend was just recently walking down the street, she was going to a her aerobics or something class. She was wearing her tight sweat suit and listening to music. At one point she felt an arm grabbing her behind, she screamed, looked behind and saw a guy. Then she screamed-What the fuck are you doing, asshole! (This is a really bad translation, it was more colorful in Serbian). He said-You are walking like you want it! And he ran away! She called me, crying for half an hour.

That was a crime, what happened to her. If only he had been silly enough to do it near some police.

It is good she had someone to call like you. The crying for half an hour now is much better than keeping it hidden for years and getting ill from it.

 

[LaFemme]

Kumbaya with Thomas and Catherine from christiananderson

Now that you mention it..... I am Canadian....and I did have a Nova Scotian beer.....:biggrin1:

 

[MickeyLee]

Mr. Rembrant, i have so far enjoyed ya participation on LPSG. you seem bright, articulate and creative... a genuinely all right fellow.

part of me is inclined to believe your post was an attempt at humor. after all you did use the one of three accepted emoticons of immunity. and until right now, this very post, you haven't displayed any sort of indications that you might be developmentally delayed or a sexist pig.

but...

just on the off chance you believe your unfortunate stumble into misogynistic double standards.. not only are you wrong, you are a fucking asshole.
:smile:

and may have just posted the stupidest thing an intelligent member of LPSG has ever shat out on the boards.

From a quick read of the thread, I've managed to glean the following:

Certain posters (women) complain about being dogged for camming, picture trading and otherwise, and they lament how 'they aren't here for that'. It's simply a wonder how so many men on a big cock site come to such a conclusion when the women in question have pictures of their spread twat and rack on their profile galleries.

Not that I'm denying that it happens completely unwarranted, though don't hang your meat in the window if it ain't for sale.

you whole contention is that women what choose to express themselves as sexual beings are to expect a certain amount of depersonalization or degradation from the male population? that men couldn't possibly retain a smidgen of basic decency once aroused?

eta: ^^^ this, that right there, so caused my hello kitty BVDs to twist up. there are some loverly menfolk on LPSG. all of them respectful, engaging and delights to pass some time with. menfolk like - Mr. Drifterwood, Mr. Vince, Mr. Tramp, Mr. MoT, Burncollector, Mr. Pitbull, Mr. Jeff Black and many i am so forgetting right now (sorry :redface.. these men can type their way into ya hearts and bloomers with minimal keystrokes.. but all of them have shown nothing be respect to the ladies of LPSG. believing men are incapable of interacting with women while erect is insulting all around.

not only does your phrasing (mini)skirt dangerously close to "she was asking for it", a sexual assault defense long used to assign culpability to the victim and distance the assailant from any legal repercussions.... you have, with one post, dismissed the negative experiences of every woman on LSPG.

why so angry? read the damn thread.

i do not feel entitled to special treatment on the merit of my panty hamster, i do expect to be treated with basic human dignity. i expect my contribution to LPSG be rated in value by content and my character, not by my cunt or a deluded belief that flattery and patronizing will ever gain you access to my emerald city. i despise the toady squad which keeps the some of the ladies perched on undeserved pedestals, by nose lodged firmly in ass, only for the hope of their attention.

since joining, i have done everything possible to not "put my meat in the front window" and i still am subject to the same PMing plea for camming, cock validation and the resulting hostilities when i politely decline.

the problem is not women being open with their sexuality, the problem is a certain subset of men seem to believe a woman's sexuality is only a lure to man, and only meant as satisfaction for a man. beautiful and attractive women are not yours to pursue or to woo, we are not prizes to be claimed or shamed. we exist without you/men as a source of satisfaction or validation.

accept that when a woman puts her photos in the gallery, she is sharing how she sees herself, how she feels attractive... her sharing is not for you, it's for her. her sense of self is entirely independent of you. she doesn't care if you desire her, if you want to posses her, or care if you want to be balls deep and blow a three-day-reserved load in her ass.. you are the audience and little more. and are entitled to nothing else.

women here rarely make demands of the men or the content of their galleries. we enjoy what is available and complement accordingly. it's only men that will take in a gallery and have the poor manners to ask "where are the pussy shots?"

how is it that you wonder why your only contact with naked women are on porn sites or members galleries.


eta: *ahem* Ms. Dolfette, Ms. Manly, Ms. Maddie Rouge, Ms. Snoozan, Ms. Maddie Zora and such.. please come back. we need brilliant minds, razor tongues and 12" clits to put things right again.
uppy_dog_eyes:

 

[The Dragon]

Mr. Rembrant, i have so far enjoyed ya participation on LPSG. you seem bright, articulate and creative... a genuinely all right fellow.

part of me is inclined to believe your post was an attempt at humor. after all you did use the one of three accepted emoticons of immunity. and until right now, this very post, you haven't displayed any sort of indications that you might be developmentally delayed or a sexist pig.

but...

just on the off chance you believe your unfortunate stumble into misogynistic double standards.. not only are you wrong, you are a fucking asshole.
:smile:

and may have just posted the stupidest thing an intelligent member of LPSG has ever shat out on the boards.




you whole contention is that women what choose to express themselves as sexual beings are to expect a certain amount of depersonalization or degradation from the male population? that men couldn't possibly retain a smidgen of basic decency once aroused?

eta: ^^^ this, that right there, so caused my hello kitty BVDs to twist up. there are some loverly menfolk on LPSG. all of them respectful, engaging and delights to pass some time with. menfolk like - Mr. Drifterwood, Mr. Vince, Mr. Tramp, Mr. MoT, Burncollector, Mr. Pitbull, Mr. Jeff Black and many i am so forgetting right now (sorry :redface.. these men can type their way into ya hearts and bloomers with minimal keystrokes.. but all of them have shown nothing be respect to the ladies of LPSG. believing men are incapable of interacting with women while erect is insulting all around.

not only does your phrasing (mini)skirt dangerously close to "she was asking for it", a sexual assault defense long used to assign culpability to the victim and distance the assailant from any legal repercussions.... you have, with one post, dismissed the negative experiences of every woman on LSPG.

why so angry? read the damn thread.

i do not feel entitled to special treatment on the merit of my panty hamster, i do expect to be treated with basic human dignity. i expect my contribution to LPSG be rated in value by content and my character, not by my cunt or a deluded belief that flattery and patronizing will ever gain you access to my emerald city. i despise the toady squad which keeps the some of the ladies perched on undeserved pedestals, by nose lodged firmly in ass, only for the hope of their attention.

since joining, i have done everything possible to not "put my meat in the front window" and i still am subject to the same PMing plea for camming, cock validation and the resulting hostilities when i politely decline.

the problem is not women being open with their sexuality, the problem is a certain subset of men seem to believe a woman's sexuality is only a lure to man, and only meant as satisfaction for a man. beautiful and attractive women are not yours to pursue or to woo, we are not prizes to be claimed or shamed. we exist without you/men as a source of satisfaction or validation.

accept that when a woman puts her photos in the gallery, she is sharing how she sees herself, how she feels attractive... her sharing is not for you, it's for her. her sense of self is entirely independent of you. she doesn't care if you desire her, if you want to posses her, or care if you want to be balls deep and blow a three-day-reserved load in her ass.. you are the audience and little more. and are entitled to nothing else.

women here rarely make demands of the men or the content of their galleries. we enjoy what is available and complement accordingly. it's only men that will take in a gallery and have the poor manners to ask "where are the pussy shots?"

how is it that you wonder why your only contact with naked women are on porn sites or members galleries.


eta: *ahem* Ms. Dolfette, Ms. Manly, Ms. Maddie Rouge, Ms. Snoozan, Ms. Maddie Zora and such.. please come back. we need brilliant minds, razor tongues and 12" clits to put things right again.
uppy_dog_eyes:

Seriously Darling..you keep this up my gay percentages are going to keep growing.

 

[MickeyLee]

Seriously Darling..you keep this up my gay percentages are going to keep growing.

*fondles Ms. D's percentages *
:naughty:

 

[Enid]

From a quick read of the thread, I've managed to glean the following:

Certain posters (women) complain about being dogged for camming, picture trading and otherwise, and they lament how 'they aren't here for that'. It's simply a wonder how so many men on a big cock site come to such a conclusion when the women in question have pictures of their spread twat and rack on their profile galleries.

Not that I'm denying that it happens completely unwarranted, though don't hang your meat in the window if it ain't for sale.

how many of the women who have responded to this thread have exposed twat and rack in their profiles?

i'm just sayin.

 

[petite]

Seriously Darling..you keep this up my gay percentages are going to keep growing.

I've long lamented that I'm unfortunately just so straight. I'm not for MickeyLee. ML, I love you. I adore you. I cannot express how much I long for you.

 

[petite]

how many of the women who have responded to this thread have exposed twat and rack in their profiles?

i'm just sayin.

True, so true. I do not think that my naked wrists have inspired such bad behavior.

 

[yongdo]

I haven't read through the entire thread, I don't know about the pm'ing issues personally that the women have to encounter on this board...

BUT I will say that I have seen a similar issue that the OP posted about.

Could anyone here imagine a feminine issues forum where men acted in a similarly haughty manner? I really couldn't.

Women, this is for the most part a silly sexual board where most guys are only typing with one hand. How could you possibly frequent this place and not expect to be harassed a bit? That just doesn't seem realistic to me and as many of you have attested it isn't.

 

[The Dragon]

:wall::saevilw:

 

[Opalite]

I haven't read through the entire thread, I don't know about the pm'ing issues personally that the women have to encounter on this board...

BUT I will say that I have seen a similar issue that the OP posted about.

Could anyone here imagine a feminine issues forum where men acted in a similarly haughty manner? I really couldn't.

Women, this is for the most part a silly sexual board where most guys are only typing with one hand. How could you possibly frequent this place and not expect to be harassed a bit? That just doesn't seem realistic to me and as many of you have attested it isn't.

Why do ask questions if you don't care about the answers? Prove me wrong, read the actual thread.

The whole beeing a jackass and "you are asking for it"-act has just been done and replied to, and it wasn't a very good look.


On different note, miss Lee can fondle my percentages any time.