Trump however is to be given the benefit of the doubt.
Even after he said himself that he doesn't even wait...
Trump however is to be given the benefit of the doubt.
Times change. Parties change. Please see The Southern Strategy.If you want to talk racism lets talk about it. I for one would like to know why the black population is so aligned to the DNC when not that long ago Democrats voted against Civil Rights, not once but twice. Robert Byrd was a grand wizard in the KKK and somehow this is just looked over. I find the double standard fascinating
It's not "agree with me". It's attempting to excuse racists.well, that’s not a stereotypical response from the left at all now, is it? Agree with me or you must be a white supremacist/racist/sexist/homophobe/nazi/fascist? That tactic is becoming so overplayed, it’s almost cliche these days...
It's like with Cosby. When one person came forward people said it probably isn't true. Two cam forward it was a bit more likely.When 10 came forward it was it probably is true and this needs to be looked into.You understand statistics, right? Do some research.
That many accusers, it's basically not possible they're all making it up.
Like I said... It wasn't just racists this president has emboldened. Smh
I don't bother reporting sexual assault after the time it happened to me at work. Because I had no evidence, no physical proof, I was assumed to be lying.
I have a very different point of view about this. I have too much experience with it personally. I don't assume every person who comes forward is being truthful, but based on stats and my personal experiences I believe MOST people with the courage to come forward knowing that it will literally ruin their lives.
Call me biased, I don't care. Sex offenders get away with it way too often because people like you want video evidence of every incident.
The thing is Trump never had the stones to face his accusers in court. If they are all "making stuff up" then go to court and prove it.oh, ok. “Argument ad populum.” A lot of people say it, so it must be true.
thank god that’s not the criteria we go by in the judicial system.
it’s actually scary that you’d publicly come out and say “with that many accusers, it’s basically not possible they’re making it all up.” Really scary. In the scientific community, you’d be shunned and ridiculed for saying something that ignorant.
I never said anything about video evidence. So let’s not straw man that please.
And to address your next post, I’m not about comparing numbers of men vs comparing numbers of women. I’m only about seeking the truth.
to quote Matt dillahunty: “I want to believe as many true things and as few false things as possible.”
that’s it. Of course there are accusations that are true, and of course there will be a minority of accusations that are falsely. I promise, you’re preaching to the choir on this topic, and I have such an immense amount of sympathy for women that have fallen victims to that system.
yes, it’s a flawed system. I can hardly imagine A perfect system. If I could, I’d be in law right now, making a huge impact for women who have had this happen to them. But flawed as the system is, I can’t suspend all my logic and say “in this case, everyone is guilty until proven innocent when they are accused.” As that is also a flawed system.
It's not "agree with me". It's attempting to excuse racists.
A person says David Duke is a Klansman and despises blacks. Another person then says well Duke gives to charity and goes to church every Sunday. One is acknowledging his racism and the other is attempting to downplay it and excuse it.
I’m not downplaying anything. A person in the KKK is a racist, as that is a concrete example. That person would still be a racist despite being charitable.
it just irks me when people throw out the accusation of being racist, and then throw out a false narrative of what makes them racist.
trump doesn’t hate Hispanics. He just doesn’t want people coming into the country through illegal means. The wall would just be a first step to combat that.
trump doesn’t hate Muslims, he just acknowledges that at this point in time, there are indeed radicals from that area of the world who are willing to do whatever it takes to kill as many Americans as possible. The travel ban would be the first step to contain that problem.
it’s ok if you don’t agree with his methodology. But that doesn’t make it racist in intent.
So unless the government is behind it it's not happening?They do get ostracized. The news covers it, and we’re all condemning it here and now.
you do realize that 100 years ago, this sort of thing would have been sanctioned by the government, and a part of every day life? To the point that half of the country didn’t even think to question it?
It's a biased system, not just flawed.
Victims of sex crimes are far more likely to be accused of lying than victims of other types of crimes.
I apologize for putting words in your mouth.
Oooh one person feels that falsely sticking him with that label is wrong.accused doesn’t mean he did it. You and I both know that. Same goes with Bill Clinton. And I openly condemn trying to stick him with that label without proper evidence.
Not everyone approves of racist behavior. Why do you insist on either/or?and when a viral video comes out showing a person causing a scene over someone speaking Spanish, or a black kid selling what is the overwhelming response? Barbecue Becky was a classic idiot, and deserved to get ostracized the way she did. All the more proof that America is sticking up for people when racist incidents like this arise.
yeah right Ive read all that and shared my view-All of this has been addressed repeatedly in this subforum.
I suggest some digging. There's lots to read.
Oooh one person feels that falsely sticking him with that label is wrong.
The problem is that those who seek to excuse Trump from his allegations are the same ones who use allegations against Clinton as proof.
It even applies to Hillary. She was alleged to have done wrong with Benghazi and her emails. She went through years of hearings and was cleared however that hasn't stopped the GOP from continuing to spread the lies about her "guilt"
And when there is no proof why not just make it up. Hello Pizzagate.
yeah right Ive read all that and shared my view-
Those who do not know their history.If you want to talk racism lets talk about it. I for one would like to know why the black population is so aligned to the DNC when not that long ago Democrats voted against Civil Rights, not once but twice. Robert Byrd was a grand wizard in the KKK and somehow this is just looked over. I find the double standard fascinating
@ArkNebradia I have a couple of questions for you.
If Norway was the country South of our border do you think Trump would be considering the wall? Why no wall on the northern border? Drugs and criminals enter there too.. (although most of the illegal drugs coming into the country come in on shipping containers, NOT in border crossings)