Why was dxjnorto banned?

Discussion in 'Et Cetera, Et Cetera' started by B_RedDude, Sep 12, 2010.

  1. B_RedDude

    B_RedDude New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,031
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    California
    Even though we had disagreements on circumcision it seemed that we could still have civil exchanges on things.
     
  2. D_Myer_Dogasflees

    D_Myer_Dogasflees New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    3
  3. D_Gunther Snotpole

    D_Gunther Snotpole Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    14,610
    Likes Received:
    5
    "dxjnorto - posted link to medical image of minor's genitalia after warning."

    That's from the thread Moderator Actions in the Questions, Comments, and Suggestions forum near the bottom of the main page.
     
  4. vince

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2007
    Messages:
    14,785
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    540
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Asia
  5. sargon20

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    11,390
    Likes Received:
    2,130
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Atlantis
    Not much of a shock. He and Sapian seem to have no boundaries in their quest to end circumcision throughout the land.
     
  6. DiscoBoy

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    2,706
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Dxjnorto was odd. I hope he's doing well.

    Oh please, pot, you're just as committed to your own cause.
     
  7. IntoxicatingToxin

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,133
    Likes Received:
    152
    Woah. Who said anything he posted was kiddie porn?
     
  8. D_Gunther Snotpole

    D_Gunther Snotpole Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    14,610
    Likes Received:
    5
    Oooh.
    Come on. You don't want to do that.
     
  9. sargon20

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    11,390
    Likes Received:
    2,130
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Atlantis
    Maybe it was hyperbole. But dxj was known for hyperbole. Nevertheless most, no 99% of us know, there should not even be a hint of underage material on your computer whatever the reason. But he knew it, was warned about it and posted it twice.
     
    #9 sargon20, Sep 12, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2010
  10. IntoxicatingToxin

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,133
    Likes Received:
    152
    For one, define "material". I have more pictures of kids on my computers than even I can imagine. Secondly, you're implying he just had a vast folder of underage material on his computer, which is something you don't know and can't prove. Your comment wasn't "hyperbole". Hyperbole = exaggeration. That was well more than a simple exaggeration.
     
  11. sargon20

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    11,390
    Likes Received:
    2,130
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Atlantis
    ^ I didn't see what the moderators objected to and glad I didn't but it was of 'minors'. But apparently it was enough for his banning and Sapien's as well.
     
  12. D_Gunther Snotpole

    D_Gunther Snotpole Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    14,610
    Likes Received:
    5
    There's a big difference between, say, a 17 y.o. and a 9 y.o.
    I don't want to push this because, while I think you were a bit injudicious, I've been there too.
    That send key does irretrievable things.
     
  13. IntoxicatingToxin

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,133
    Likes Received:
    152
    Let's make it clear, then. Posting pictures of an underage child is against the rules of the site. It could be someone's completely clothed 2 year old nephew with birthday cake on his face. As innocent as can be. However, we can't assume everyone on this site is innocent. That child, by having their picture posted here, could become the object of some sicko's perverted thoughts. That child could now be endangered. The subject matter after such a picture had been posted could quickly become something disgusting, illegal, offensive, and against the rules of the site. Therefore, we allow ZERO pictures of underage kids to be posted on the site, I don't care what it is. What he got banned for wasn't "kiddie porn". It was pictures of minors.
     
  14. sargon20

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    11,390
    Likes Received:
    2,130
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Atlantis
    It wasn't meant to be taken literally. Hence it was deleted.
     
  15. crescendo69

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    Messages:
    8,142
    Likes Received:
    20
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Knoxville, TN
    I found him a little insensitive to new members with comments like, "Too bad you're circumcised."
     
  16. HazelGod

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    7,531
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    9
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The Other Side of the Pillow
    Dxjnorto got himself cut? Now that's ironic. :lmao:
     
  17. maxcok

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    7,392
    Likes Received:
    12
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Elsewhere
    Now that's a stretch. :rolleyes: :wink:
     
  18. ManlyBanisters

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    12,807
    Likes Received:
    8
    Yes, this seems a rather clear cut case to me. :rolleyes:

    There was nothing sexually untoward in what he posted. I saw the image he got warned for (and, in fact, I reported it as being inappropriate for the site). I did not see that which he got banned for, from the wording of the mod actions thread I believe it is a safe assumption that it was a very similar, if not the same, medical image of an infant circumcision being performed.

    However, he was warned it was not on and he chose to ignore that warning and is now banned. Can't say I'm anything other than 100% behind the mod team on this one.
     
  19. Drifterwood

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2007
    Messages:
    15,725
    Likes Received:
    386
    Location:
    Fingringhoe (GB)
    I presume that you can link to bona fide material directly relevant to a discussion between adults?

    I also presume that those seeking kiddie porn have far better sources than browsing this entire site for the odd snippet that may include an image that whilst clearly not pornographic may be taken as such by someone with an illness.

    I would like to defend DX more, but I don't know what images he was warned not to post. It wasn't that much linked video of the poor baby screaming during circumcision was it? Because that has been linked here many times.
     
  20. ManlyBanisters

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    12,807
    Likes Received:
    8
    The image I saw, that he got the warning about, was an image of an infant circumcision in progress - operating sheet cut-away, showing an infant's penis and testicles, with the foreskin in a clamp about to be cut.

    While I agree that we should be able to have an adult discussion of matters such as circumcision I also understand that this site has a rule of no images of minors, at all. Uploading or linking to an image of a minor or part of a minor is not allowed on this site. dx was clearly illustrating a point and there was no dubious sexual intent behind the posting of that image. The mod team, fairly I thought, removed the image and warned him that it was not allowed on this site. He then linked to the same or similar image. That time he knew he was not supposed to - what did he expect the mod team to do?

    That image was not a required part of the discussion and even if it was that's just tough - the no images of minors rule is clear.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted