Apparently you have no knowledge of the quote. And because you have snapped to conclusions, it only shows your stupidity.
First of all, every person everywhere is aware of the fact that President Bush couldn't get the "Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me" adage down correctly. The President of the United States couldn't accurately quote a lesson I learned from
Hank the Cowdog in the 2nd grade. I'm very much aware of it. Type in "Fool me" and "George" into any search engine and you'll get video after video. There was no "conclusion" to jump to other than what quoting George W. Bush and you yourself had already declared- a conservative showed up to applaud the banning of a liberal member.
Secondly, your post is enough to report under the guidelines as I understand them. Rather than attack my idea or lack of knowledge, you called me stupid directly. I'd be well within my rights to report that post and start
you down a path of moderated behavior. You know what the difference is between me and someone who would do that?
I can handle being called stupid without a moderator kissing my scrapped knee and giving me a lollipop.
So, if it's that kind of nonsense, where someone decides its more important to try to come off as wise and instead just came off as wise-ass, that ultimately sealed VB's fate? Well, I don't agree with it. And that, not you, was the point of my posting here in the first place.
PS; Don't ever post on my profile again telling
me to do research. If you have something to say to me, send it in a private message or find me on the forums.
JSZ