Why your cock looks that way

nickntime

Cherished Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Posts
282
Media
12
Likes
301
Points
408
Location
Sacramento (California, United States)
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
I just read this and it is fascinating ...
Why Is The Penis Shaped Like That? (EXCERPT)

The unique shape of the cock head scoops away the cum of competing men from the inside of a woman's pussy. So ... being the last one in a gangbang is definitely the preferred position.

What do you think?
 

MickeyLee

Mythical Member
Staff
Moderator
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Nov 3, 2008
Posts
33,705
Media
7
Likes
49,842
Points
618
Location
neverhood
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
i prefer to think form is matter of function. that female orgasm increases semen uptake into the uterus neck. the shape of the glans/size of the human male penis is meant to correspond to the size/shape of the female human lady-bits to increase odds of more sperm in the cervical os, repeated matings, and couple bonding during the early developmental stage of resulting offspring.

is the same reason human females always have breasts, even when not feeding young. why are rumps are always plump to mimic estrus/being sexually receptive.

and genital size could be related to how large human babies are compared to other species. most large mammals give birth to proportionally smaller kits. larger babies = larger vag = larger peen.

guess is says more about human nature/current cultural standards that what could be seen a design of mutual pleasure is more about male/male competition and women/fertilization being the prize.

wootwoot rape culture!
 
Last edited:

Hoss

Loved Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Posts
11,801
Media
2
Likes
586
Points
148
Age
73
Location
Eastern town
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
I just read this and it is fascinating ...
Why Is The Penis Shaped Like That? (EXCERPT)

The unique shape of the cock head scoops away the cum of competing men from the inside of a woman's pussy. So ... being the last one in a gangbang is definitely the preferred position.

What do you think?
I think it's quite amusing.

Okay there may be a tiny element of truth to the idea that penis number 2 will pull out some semen and sperm of the previous man, but that I think is more from the sex itself and the idea that he will be sloshing around where the other man ejaculated and mixed with the lubricating fluids of the female some of what another man left will come out.


Of course when the 2nd man cums he might also have enough force in his ejaculating to shoot the 1st man's sperm further into the woman.



I now anxiously await the theory of why some men have a lot of thick veins which are visible in their penis and others practically none are visible.
 

gymfresh

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 8, 2008
Posts
1,633
Media
20
Likes
154
Points
383
Location
Rodinia
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I just read this and it is fascinating ...
Why Is The Penis Shaped Like That? (EXCERPT)

The unique shape of the cock head scoops away the cum of competing men from the inside of a woman's pussy. So ... being the last one in a gangbang is definitely the preferred position.

What do you think?

Yeah, that "scoop" idea has been pretty widely criticized. It's been postulated and promoted by 2 American researchers, a 70 y.o. man and a 40 y.o. woman. Their theory makes some sense for circumcised men, but that's a modern America-centric view.

Most guys elsewhere and throughout history have been intact. And on your standard intact guy, the foreskin everts and bunches during coitus and completely fills the sulcus behind the corona glandis, like a convertible top fills the space behind the back seat. There are exposed ridged bands for sensation, but no "scoop" -- particularly on the outstroke. Nice try, Gallup & Burch, but your anatomical model doesn't fit most of humanity.
 

olympusj

Admired Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 17, 2012
Posts
55
Media
41
Likes
801
Points
268
Location
France
Verification
View
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
I think this shape allows more friction, so more pleasure for the male. This way he cums faster, and takes less time to fertilize the female.

For Homos sapiens sapiens it doesn't seem to be a good explanation, since the duration of the intercourse doesn't have much importance. However, our penis is an inheritance from more ancient and more wild species. For these species, a long intercourse implied a long time exposed to predators. That's why the faster the male fertilized the female, the more likely he was to survive.

That's my theory.
 

PerfectlySexy

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Posts
263
Media
26
Likes
71
Points
273
Location
The Pacific Northwest
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male

8x6jax

1st Like
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Posts
1
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
36
Students at Georgia Tech spent $20 on researching this very thing. After buying a porn mag and a 6 pack, they came to the following conclusion:

It's to keep your hand from slipping off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davis0444
S

SirConcis

Guest
from evolutionary point of vue, those mammal males who come faster have more odds if fertilizing the neighbourhood female.

If it takes 1 hour for a lion to cum into the lioness, then the odds are high some other lion will challenge him during the act (resulting on coitus interruptus and a big fight.)

The pronounced rim onthe corrona on humans is not common to all mammals though. Many animals have smaller glans. Smaller glans also means less chance of phimosis, which is why other mammals did not adopt circumcision :)

Large glans probably came about because it impressed the human females and thus gave the guy with larger glans better odds of getting laid and sewing his seeds. And this also explains why many tribal sociaties adopted circumcision as a manhood ritual because it was felt that the bigger exposed glans was more attractive to the females.

I don't think the larger glans in humans have to do with greater odds of sperm reaching final destination. I think it is more societal selection (aka: women prefering guys with big glans.).
 

someperson

Legendary Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2011
Posts
4,091
Media
9
Likes
1,845
Points
198
Location
Los Angeles, California
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
Yeah, that "scoop" idea has been pretty widely criticized. It's been postulated and promoted by 2 American researchers, a 70 y.o. man and a 40 y.o. woman. Their theory makes some sense for circumcised men, but that's a modern America-centric view.

Most guys elsewhere and throughout history have been intact. And on your standard intact guy, the foreskin everts and bunches during coitus and completely fills the sulcus behind the corona glandis, like a convertible top fills the space behind the back seat. There are exposed ridged bands for sensation, but no "scoop" -- particularly on the outstroke. Nice try, Gallup & Burch, but your anatomical model doesn't fit most of humanity.
Incorrect when I precum a lot it usually gets drawn to the outer foreskin area or into the scoop area.
 
Last edited: