With Europe falling apart financially....

7

798686

Guest
I don't really like the terms 'right' and 'left' as it tends to paint a person in a single shade. For the terms of this discussion I used hyperbole to emphasize a certain point of view. The US thrived for a long period without the ideological corners that the press paints and political parties seem to think we are in. Is there a middle anymore? Every issue and how to solve it isn't necessarily 'right' and 'left'.

I'm pessimistic that voice will ever be heard again. Being in the middle doesn't win elections. It doesn't generate anger needed to generate votes. Karl Rove realized that years ago.
I agree - I prefer a centrist stance myself, usually the best solution, imo.

Spec - that kinda sounds a bit biased in itself. Is the right capable of recognising its bias either?

I agree the left wont consider changes to the NHS - but apparently Labour would have done (under Blair at least). He wanted more business practices imported to the public services, along w/competition etc.
 

Speculator

1st Like
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Posts
375
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
53
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Spec - that kinda sounds a bit biased in itself. Is the right capable of recognising its bias either?

What I mean is the left- broadly speaking- seem unable to distinguish between their political viewpoint and the objective outside world.

So lets take state education for example, a rightie expresses the view that all education should be left upto the individual, this is clearly an opinion based upon the libertarian doctrine. A leftie lends support to the status quo and because he's defending the system that's currently in place fails to acknowledge that his opinion is equally as ideological, it's just the way things are in his mind.

Because righties have obviously thought the system through and avoided plumping for established practice they're more aware of their own political bias.
 
Last edited:

B_New End

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Posts
2,970
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
183
Location
WA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
All I want is decent quality affordable healthcare when I need it, I don't mind how it's provided.

You want to bring back privatized healthcare? You want to start shopping around for insurance companies? have you ever lived under such a system?
 

Speculator

1st Like
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Posts
375
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
53
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
You want to bring back privatized healthcare? You want to start shopping around for insurance companies? have you ever lived under such a system?


We have privatised healthcare in the UK, it's so useful the government pay companies like BUPA to take on NHS patients. But the answer to your question is no, as I'm not incredibly wealthy I'd prefer the lesser evil of the British NHS.

America may have a private healthcare system but it's not a free market system, there's a massive difference. Government regulation produces a bottleneck that prevents individuals from making it into the profession, in other words it acts as a subsidy paid to medics/insurers by the public.

If you want cheap healthcare the answer isn't more statism, it's total deregulation. The medical profession would hate it as their privileged postion -protected by government- would no longer exist and they'd have to compete with more entrants into the market. Adam Smith wrote about this sort of thing 200 years ago, he warned of the dangers of allowing groups of professionals to form effective cartels.
 
Last edited:

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
The biggest difference between the left and right is that the former are utterly incapable of recognising their own bias, I've seen this time and again, especially with the BBC.

Because righties have obviously thought the system through and avoided plumping for established practice they're more aware of their own political bias.
Utter horseshit.
 

Speculator

1st Like
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Posts
375
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
53
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Utter horseshit.


Sorry buddy, but when you pick your opinions of the outside world off the shelf you can't really blame me for dismissing you as 2 dimensional.

Do I really need to know what maxcok thinks on a particular subject? No, I can just think back to when I was 15 and believed that we should all have free healthcare, free education and a tax system that helped the poor.
 
Last edited:

B_New End

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2007
Posts
2,970
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
183
Location
WA
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
The biggest difference between the left and right is that the former are utterly incapable of recognising their own bias, I've seen this time and again, especially with the BBC.
Because righties have obviously thought the system through and avoided plumping for established practice they're more aware of their own political bias.
So your argument boils down to righties are right and lefties are wrong. OK.

But the answer to your question is no, as I'm not incredibly wealthy I'd prefer the lesser evil of the British NHS.
Collaborator.
 

B_talltpaguy

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Posts
2,331
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
123
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Can we all now admit the USA should NOT be following in their foot steps in any way.
I couldn't possibly agree more!!!


If the rich try pulling that austerity shit here, they're going to wake up to their houses being lit ablaze, and well armed mobs waiting for them to flee.
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
Sorry buddy, but when you pick your opinions of the outside world off the shelf you can't really blame me for dismissing you as 2 dimensional.
Unless you're someone other than you claim to be, which is a distinct possibility, you don't know my politics at all. I venture to say that my opinions are as objectively arrived at as anyone on this board. You can blame yourself for being one dimensional and dealing in ideologically based knee-jerk conclusions.

Do I really need to know what maxcok thinks on a particular subject? No, I can just read this month's issue of the socialist worker.
I think your opinions can be found in the latest issue of URA Troll.
 

Speculator

1st Like
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Posts
375
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
53
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Unless you're someone other than you claim to be, which is a distinct possibility, you don't know my politics at all. I venture to say that my opinions are as objectively arrived at as anyone on this board. You can blame yourself for being one dimensional and dealing in ideologically based knee-jerk conclusions.

I think your opinions can be found in the latest issue of URA Troll.


True to form, instead of addressing any of the points that have been raised your immediate reaction is to engage in a mini smear-campaign against those you disagree with.

It's why I abandoned the left long ago, they're way too vindictive for my liking.
 

maxcok

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Posts
7,153
Media
0
Likes
125
Points
83
Location
Elsewhere
Gender
Male
True to form, instead of addressing any of the points that have been raised your immediate reaction is to engage in a mini smear-campaign against those you disagree with.

It's why I abandoned the left long ago, they're way too vindictive for my liking.
But you see, I did directly address the points you made. When you make points like this . . .
The biggest difference between the left and right is that the former are utterly incapable of recognising their own bias, I've seen this time and again, especially with the BBC.
Because righties have obviously thought the system through and avoided plumping for established practice they're more aware of their own political bias.
Sorry buddy, but when you pick your opinions of the outside world off the shelf you can't really blame me for dismissing you as 2 dimensional.

Do I really need to know what maxcok thinks on a particular subject? No, I can just read this month's issue of the socialist worker.
. . . . you are ironically and hypocritically engaging in exactly the sort of smug ideologically biased uncritical thinking you accuse the "libtards" of. In addition, you can't seriously blame me for going afield of the topic when I was following your lead. That would be a disingenuous and trollish tactic to employ, wouldn't it? Furthermore, you have lumped me in with a stereotype without knowing my political views at all, other than that I don't take well to self-confessed white supremacists, as you proudly revealed yourself to be here, post #73.

All the foregoing renders you incapable and unworthy of honest debate. If that weren't enough, you went back and changed the text of your post after I quoted it. The original quote is restored and bolded above, and it reveals, again hypocritically, that while you accuse me of "smearing" you, it is in fact you smeared me with your very first response. In short, you are a slimy button pushing racist troll, as everyone can plainly see.

. . . he showed me the error of my ways and coaxed out my inner "racist", I fought it initially but he was quite persuasive. I don't think the label racist is very helpful though, it has all sorts of negative connotations and is a bit of mental roadblock for libtards, they can't get passed it . . .
 
Last edited:

dandelion

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Sep 25, 2009
Posts
13,297
Media
21
Likes
2,705
Points
358
Location
UK
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
We have privatised healthcare in the UK, it's so useful the government pay companies like BUPA to take on NHS patients.
We have private health care which is excellent but so expensive only the rich can afford it. We have private health care which carries out certain specific tasks on contract, then if something goes wrong or it turns out to be difficult, passes the patient back to the NHS. We have private health care under insurance which will fast track you for minor matters. Governments for 30 years have been seeking ways to involve private companies in NHS medicine and havnt managed it yet. By now that can only mean the private sector has failed to come up with a service which is better than the state one.

Government regulation produces a bottleneck that prevents individuals from making it into the profession, in other words it acts as a subsidy paid to medics/insurers by the public.
Have to agree. I'm in favour of governments warning the public, but not making prohibitions. Not just in medicine, but all sorts of things. Theres a line where the state should stop interfering and it usually goes too far. As a particular example, about 15 years ago you used to be able to buy all sorts of drugs for treating animals without fuss. Then some bright spark from the british pharmacology society got the power to regulate this, so now you cant sell this stuff without licensing. Happily some companies seem to have got round this and are still selling halfway reasonably priced stuff, but it is a closed shop for making money. It prevents small people coming into the industry.

Adam Smith wrote about this sort of thing 200 years ago, he warned of the dangers of allowing groups of professionals to form effective cartels.
Bankers bankers bankers.

In the case of the US there is another obvious problem with their economy. The US army. in 1914 the UK was an island not unlike the US now, so there was a low risk of immediate invasion. It had a world spanning empire to defend, which the US does not have. It had a standing professional army of 250,000 of whom only about 150,000 were available to be sent urgently to Europe when the war started. The british empire recognised the importance of not having too many troops, because it is ridiculously expensive. The US is still running on a war footing.

And I'd better say it again. This crisis is all about speculating on the price and value of housing. Europes finances were destabilised by the US led property bubble, which lucky for them US banks managed to sell to the rest of the world. All governments everywhere live close to the edge financially. No one in government ever amasses a vast pile of cash 'just in case'. The US led disaster has pushed the least prudent ones over the edge.
 

Speculator

1st Like
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Posts
375
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
53
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
But you see, I did directly address the points you made. When you make points like this . . .


. . . . you are ironically and hypocritically engaging in exactly the sort of smug ideologically biased uncritical thinking you accuse the "libtards" of. In addition, you can't seriously blame me for going afield of the topic when I was following your lead. That would be a disingenuous and trollish tactic to employ, wouldn't it? Furthermore, you have lumped me in with a stereotype without knowing my political views at all, other than that I don't take well to self-confessed white supremacists, as you proudly revealed yourself to be here, post #73.




If that weren't enough, you went back and changed the text of your post after I quoted it. The original quote is restored and bolded above, and it reveals, again hypocritically, that while you accuse me of "smearing" you, it is in fact you smeared me with your very first response. In short, you are a slimy button pushing racist troll, as everyone can plainly see.



3 posts in now and still not a peep on socialised healthcare, the European debt crisis or American economic policy, what do you want us to do, beg for an on topic opinion? If you feel lumped in with the lefty libtard group it's because I've only seen you express sythetic indignation, a lefty hallmark. If I've got this wrong surprise me, but in order to do that you'll have to climb down from your high horse and engage in battle, not just throw playground insults around and smear as is your life depended on it



All the foregoing renders you incapable and unworthy of honest debate.
Then don't respond to my posts!!!!!!!!
 

Speculator

1st Like
Joined
Oct 31, 2010
Posts
375
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
53
Location
Kent, UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
By now that can only mean the private sector has failed to come up with a service which is better than the state one.

The playing field is very uneven though, 90% of the potential UK market is taken care of by the government. This alone makes investment in the healthcare industry extra risky, unless you can factor in lucrative government contracts to your business plans. It's the classic crowding out effect, which leaves enterprise starved of the resources they need to really make a go of it.

I'm not a regular hospital goer (never had an op) but have used all three systems: NHS, BUPA/NHS and private, and hand on heart the order I'd rate them is private first, then BUPA/NHS then finally NHS. After finding my private dentist for example there's no way I'd go back to the gov't scheme, they totally ruined the dental industry.


Have to agree. I'm in favour of governments warning the public, but not making prohibitions. Not just in medicine, but all sorts of things. Theres a line where the state should stop interfering and it usually goes too far. As a particular example, about 15 years ago you used to be able to buy all sorts of drugs for treating animals without fuss. Then some bright spark from the british pharmacology society got the power to regulate this, so now you cant sell this stuff without licensing. Happily some companies seem to have got round this and are still selling halfway reasonably priced stuff, but it is a closed shop for making money. It prevents small people coming into the industry.
Agreed, regulation is just another form of subsidy. The stock response is that the heavier the regulation the higher quality the service, leaving aside whether this is true or not, should we force consumers to always purchase the ferrari service? Even with a topic as emotive as healthcare, I don't see why we can't have a range of providers pitching their product at different markets depending on income levels, preventing this only plays into the hands of state sanctioned physicians as it prevents competition.

And I'd better say it again. This crisis is all about speculating on the price and value of housing. Europes finances were destabilised by the US led property bubble, which lucky for them US banks managed to sell to the rest of the world. All governments everywhere live close to the edge financially. No one in government ever amasses a vast pile of cash 'just in case'. The US led disaster has pushed the least prudent ones over the edge.
I do agree with you here, but feel that a certain G.Brown overplayed the U.S's importance in the U.K's meltdown to get himself off the hook. The sort of banks that were hit hardest weren't speculating in U.S bond debt, they were rather ordinary U.K mortgage banks: Northern Rock, Alliance and Leicester and HBOS. The U.S could have acted like angels over the past decade and we would still have experienced a great banking crash because we allowed our property market to balloon, not to the extent of Ireland's, but big enough to destabilise the financial system.
 
Last edited:

Drifterwood

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2007
Posts
18,678
Media
0
Likes
2,812
Points
333
Location
Greece
My thoughts on this interesting debate.

The real socialists now are those involved in anti globalisation.

The only way that you can achieve Dandy's view is to lock the door on capable people and make them work for you with no reward. Yes, Slavery to your dogma. I suppose that I could put up with living in Cuba, but North Korea, no thank you. Totalitarianism isn't very pretty.

Where I meet with Dandy, though rprobably not for the same reasons, is social justice. But how do you achieve this? Dandy likes the Big State and tax the rich, tax the rich. The problem with this, is simply who are the rich? Ironically, people who work for the State have been better paid than the Private sector since 2005 in the UK. But then they are not subject to the same risk of poor performance and have benefits and pensions that the pPrivate Sector can not pay for.

State politicians have let the multi nationals go, they can operate off shore and are too big for a government to tackle, the government needs the scraps of jobs that they throw their way to pay them off. So you are left with the visible wealthy, who aren't in reality that wealthy. I know self made people who ear $300,000 a year and have nothing left. They pay 45%+ tax and then the choices they make, nice house, nice cars, private education, ;eave them with nothing. Well I suppose they could live in small houses, have small cars and take free stuff from the State, but this takes a lot of money out of the system.

You can't have it both ways. Either people who add value are rewarded or they go elsewhere. This was the very argument that the State has made to overpay the Fat Cats in the Public Sector and there are tens of thousands of them. Is this social justice? The irony runs even deeper because the tax the rich mob don't even have these people on their radar.

As a commercial business owner, the UK NHS gets at best a C from me, whilst every doctor and manager feeds at the trough of underperformance. The German, French and Canadian public health models are much better, but the English are too stupid, arrogant and steeped in self interest to admit it. The NHS stopped being a National Insurance, though of course we still pay it.

I think that the role of the State is to regulate, not to operate. You achieve Social Justice through allowing enterprise to create wealth, wealth that stays in the country and pays for competitively delivered public services.

I am a wealth creator. Rather than being appreciated for the benefits that I have given, I am some sort of rich cunt who has exploited a series of people to create wealth. Ignorant fuckers. What I am not prepared to do is to carry the risks I take just so that a bloated overpaid underperforming state sector can piss my hard work up against the wall, and then come back at me with hatred and demands for more money. Fuck you, I can take my abilities with me and help to create wealth and prosperity for someone else's country and get a fair deal for doing so.