dcwrestlefan
Sexy Member
BronxBombshell said:Sexless does not mean loveless. I need great sex and romance to be a part of any marriage I would agree to. But I know a man who would make a wonderful, loving husband for a woman who could be very independant, industrious, a good conversationalist, and above all, not expect much physical affection. He's more interested in a laugh and a strategy game than an orgasm. Actually, I don't know if he is attracted to men or women or both or neither. He says he's not sexual. he's not gay, no, but neither is he unable to give love.
the situation i knew lacked both love and sex. the "husband" went out all the time and picked up guys. the relationship that the man and woman had was like will and grace, but even less affection involved.
i know what you are saying, but there is no reason to marry someone just because you have stuff in common, if there is no bond beyond friendship. my opinion, not a strong one...to each their own.