World's Tallest Man-- Turk Sultan Kosen

7x6

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Posts
612
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
248
Gender
Male
This reminds me of a TV interview I saw with Britain's tallest man many years ago. The presenter asked "Is everything thing, erm, in proportion?", he answered "Listen, if everything was in proportion I'd be Ten foot Eight"
 

blackbottom2

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2006
Posts
1,476
Media
2
Likes
202
Points
283
There is some established factual evidence that confirms penis to body size mainly that the bigger your body the more likely it is that you will have a bigger penis, not always but just more likely, hence we have the age old comparisons and racial stereotypes where body size does often have a bearing

SO DO SMALL WOMEN HAVE TIGHTER PUSSIES?
 

rickygNOLA

Superior Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Posts
4,983
Media
6
Likes
5,126
Points
343
Location
New Orleans (Louisiana, United States)
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I see, I see...so it just happens that every other organ in his body (heart, liver, intestines) did not grow exponentally therefor giving him the funcyional organs of a body that averages 5'10". he would be dead! Sheesh is your roommate an M.D. or a PhD. in English???

you quoted someone else, but I'M the one whose partner is a doctor. an orthopedist actually.


you ignorant dickhead.
 

pepinogrande

Cherished Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2009
Posts
311
Media
12
Likes
436
Points
218
Location
New Orleans / The Land of Big Cucumbers
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I am an MD. There is NO correlation between physical height and penis size that is established in properly conducted and accepted medical literature.
......................

I'm a shrink, I agree with samhung: though it's not my part of the body!

Our sexuality seems to have to do with chromosomes 8,9,10 and 56 genes; it does not --unfortunately-- always follow that tall=big / short=small.

There is the irony about Frank Sinatra, "his weight was only 120 lbs: 100 of which was dick".

However, without any scientific proof, I have noticed that the very tall --are sometimes: if not longer-- do seem to have thicker dicks to make up for their radically accentuated height; this may be to increase the probability of orgasm and conception in some way with smaller women to "even" things out......whereas, long would just produce pain.

Again, my idea is NOT science, just an observation and passing thought.
 

tommiet

Legendary Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Posts
1,007
Media
0
Likes
1,033
Points
343
Location
BOSTON
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Um yeah, a distinguished MD, who has studied long and hard to become a healer...and you're browsing a bidick porn site? Really adult!
 

gaybriel

Sexy Member
Joined
May 27, 2009
Posts
132
Media
0
Likes
91
Points
103
Location
UK
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male

samhung

Sexy Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
160
Media
0
Likes
29
Points
248
Gender
Male
Your misperception. Since you claim to have the data, I would like to see it.

The lack of evidence is NOT evidence in medical research.

You have an idea, you form a hypothesis and then test it. Whatever you are testing (type of data being studied) determines how you analyze it.

Do your own research.

You are engaging in a non-sequitur, meaning the conclusion does not flow from the premises.

While you are at it, grow up.
 

dmmd247

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2009
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
91
Location
USA
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
I am not a doctor, nor do I have a relative or a partner or a neighbor as a doctor. However, I have no reason to disbelieve the posts of the member who says his partner is one.
What I am is a male member of society in the US (I say this because I am only speaking of what I know here and do not want to speak for others who may be from some other country-although I suspect it is not much different). As such I have had the opportunity to observe the nude male form in such places as the High School and College locker rooms, the sports facilities of local teams when given access to their locker rooms, the occassional theme water park where you can use the facilties to change and shower after being in the water all day, etc. While many instances it became obviously apparent that height and general size of the guy, for the most part, did play a role in the size of one's penis, many times there also was the exception.
As a good example was a good friend of mine who as a freshman was only 5'-3" tall and was maybe 110 lbs soaking wet at best, yet he had a 7" penis when soft ( I never got to see it hard). Even though he only grew an inch taller in height and added maybe 5 pounds by his senior year, he gained about another 1/2-1" in flacid length on his penis. This was in the day before the sagging and baggy pants trend. It actually was during the somewhat tight polyester pants days and he showed quite a bit when walking in the halls. He actually used to get teased by the school bully/idiot ( a junior. at the time) that he was stuffing to try to impress the ladies because he couldn't make up for it in his height/weight. For the most part he just ignored the guy. We in his class already knew he was not faking it in any way. One day towards the end of his freshman year, he called the guy out and told him to follow him into the boy's restroom. He proceeded to drop his pants and stand there completely exposed for all to see that followed into the room. The bully/idiot (after picking up his jaw off the floor) turned the deepest shade of red and bolted out of the restroom and was silent for the rest of the year. (Oh to have a cell phone with photo capabilities back then).
I also had the opportunity to play intramural sports while in college (at a major university/Div. 1 school with sports players a little on the larger size) and had the pleasure of sharing the same locker rooms as some guys on the basketball team who also played intramural sports as a means of practice. I became friends with one guy who was 6'-10" tall and average build for his height and being a starter on the basketball team. He was very well porportined except for his penis. This guy actually had a 2" penis when flacid which looked even smaller due to his physical size. I gave him credit because it didn't seem to bother him at all when he was in the locker room (maybe he was a grower and not a shower or maybe he just could care less).
I give these as personal examples of people I have known and seen, but by no means were they the only guys I have seen with such diversity. Both of these were a little extreme, but several other came close with similar measurements as well as those with small penises on small bodies and large penises on larger/taller bodies. So for that reason I have to agree that body height does not dictate penis length (also using someone of African ancestory as a standard of large penises and a Vietnamese as the standard for small penises is a stereotype proven wrong many times over-I have actually personally seen more African-Americans with 'normal' to less than 'normal' size penises than I have seen with larger ones and have seen enough Asian porn to know there are may of those guys with above average sized penises). That is enough evidence for me without even having seen what I am sure is valid info from the studies on the matter being talked about.
Unless you have never particiapted in these adolescent and young adult 'rituals' while growing up or are not now member of a gym, there is no reason for you to think otherwise nor should you question the validity of those studies.
 
Last edited:

B_dxjnorto

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2006
Posts
6,876
Media
0
Likes
206
Points
193
Location
Southwest U.S.
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
The lack of evidence is NOT evidence in medical research.
You claim to have evidence. That is not a non-sequitur. I think you are just too used to being a doctor and falling back on, "because I said so." You oughta be able to pull up where ever you got your assertion below:
I am an MD. There is NO correlation between physical height and penis size that is established in properly conducted and accepted medical literature.
So no correlation means no research. So there's your non-sequitur.