would you be in a porno or adult video??

D_vtfyjndtlk

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Posts
6
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
36
so how many girls out there would be in a porn if you were offered a job? dose it make you a whore getting paid for sex? or is it ok because its a job with a company?? HELP!! need some input please
 

Endued

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Posts
1,858
Media
0
Likes
29
Points
133
Sexuality
No Response
whore as in prostitute? yes, it does.
you sleep with people for money.

Sorry, but you don't understand the words you're using. Maybe look them up?

LoveThemBigTX, what dolfette and AE are unintentionally telling you, is that there is still a big old stigma attached to being in porn, to the point where a lot of people can't seem to separate the exhibitionism of having sex in front of a lens with prostitution.

So there's nothing inherently wrong with being involved in porn, but you might have to deal with with people who can't make that distinction.
 

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,175
Media
37
Likes
26,237
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
Sorry, but you don't understand the words you're using. Maybe look them up?

LoveThemBigTX, what dolfette and AE are unintentionally telling you, is that there is still a big old stigma attached to being in porn, to the point where a lot of people can't seem to separate the exhibitionism of having sex in front of a lens with prostitution.

So there's nothing inherently wrong with being involved in porn, but you might have to deal with with people who can't make that distinction.
Is she planning on doing it for free? I attach no stigma to prostitution. Prostitution is totally legit in my book. Anything a person wants to sell of his or her own that other people will pay for is A-ok. I have known a few prostitutes. They were bright, articulate, worldly, and just overall awesome women. One of them seemed to make more money than I could even figure out how to spend if it were mine. But I wouldn't do the work. It's not for me. I would not feel safe at all. On the other hand, I would have sex in front of people, and have had sex on camera.

Professional pornographic performers are prostitutes. It is you who require the dictionary, and perhaps other means of education as well, since I certainly have never said there was anything wrong with being in porn, or being a whore.
 
Last edited:

dolfette

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Posts
11,303
Media
0
Likes
110
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
Sorry, but you don't understand the words you're using. Maybe look them up?

LoveThemBigTX, what dolfette and AE are unintentionally telling you, is that there is still a big old stigma attached to being in porn, to the point where a lot of people can't seem to separate the exhibitionism of having sex in front of a lens with prostitution.

So there's nothing inherently wrong with being involved in porn, but you might have to deal with with people who can't make that distinction.
why are you judging prostitution more harshly than porn?
two people have sex for money.
one has a camera, so they're ok.
one does not, so they're just a whore?
double standards.

people create these shitty double standards to suit themselves.
two consenting adults having sex...or three, or four.

if people want to watch porn then they should quit being so shitty to prostitutes. the moral hypocrisy is ludicrous!
 

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
I think Endued thinks we mean 'whore' the way he means 'whore'. We don't - it isn't our problem he has such negative emotions about prostitutes. I lived in the same building as a few whores for a while in my college years - they were great women, I loved them and admired them.

I wouldn't ever do the job they did. But I didn't judge them negatively for having a different stance on that from me.
 
Last edited:

dolfette

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Posts
11,303
Media
0
Likes
110
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
I think Endued thinks we mean 'whore' the way he means 'whore'. We don't - it isn't our problem he has such negative emotions about prostitutes. I lived in the same building as a few whores for a while in my college years - they were great women, I loved them and admired them.

I wouldn't ever do the job they did. But I didn't judge them negatively for having a different stance on that from me.
nail on the head.
 

Endued

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Posts
1,858
Media
0
Likes
29
Points
133
Sexuality
No Response
Um, the negative implication of prostitution/being a whore came from the op who asked whether perfoming in a porno gives that impression, which is a reflection of the general implications most people would associate with the terms.

My view, though irrelevant, is that I don't think any less/more of people who hump on camera to those who hump clients, but let's be honest, I am in the minority.

What I'm trying to say, is that whore/prostitute are loaded terms that shouldn't be associated with shagging in front of a lens, because you're tarring two groups of people with the same brush (in many people's eyes, not mine!!!). Just casually throwing around 'whore' and 'prostitue' in respect of things that don't really fall under the umbrella - regardless of whether you agree with the implications of the terms - is pretty reckless IMO.

But in terms of pure definitions, I don't know why you'd choose to not separate porn and vice. It just seems... odd.
 
Last edited:

dolfette

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Posts
11,303
Media
0
Likes
110
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
have you seen those garden makeover shows?the ones where this team goes into sombody's garden, digs, designs, plants shit? where they get paid to garden?

well they're not actually gardeners because it's done for the camera.
 

Endued

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2009
Posts
1,858
Media
0
Likes
29
Points
133
Sexuality
No Response
why would we think that having sex for money is the same as prostitution? lord knows!

FFS dolfette! Ugh.

The point is why would you deconstruct it down to this? What possible benefit can there be by the pointless breaking down of useful descriptors in general, but especially when you doing so just spreads so many implications?