Would you fuck, date, marry/ltr a size queen?

[Daisy]

Are you sure? Are you shallow because you have standards? Everyone draws a line in the sand somewhere. I draw several. One of mine is full lips. Men who don't appear to have lips, but rather a line where the mouth should go, freak me out. Oh, we can be friends, and I will make them laugh, trade secrets, love them, and even shower them with affection as I stare daily into their weird little face holes.
Fuck them? HELL NO! Let them fuck women who can find a face without lips attractive. That shit is not for me. That's my example. Everyone is entitled to limit who has sexual access to them. Size queens included. And who cares if they are promiscuous? I am no size queen, and I used to be quite promiscuous. It was fun. It was easy. (So was I! *giggle*) I played a lot, but I played safely. People who slut-shame should be ashamed. Maybe they're envious.

sar·casm noun \ˈsär-ˌka-zəm\
Definition of SARCASM

1
: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2
a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b : the use or language of sarcasm

Sarcasm, you see because I am a size queen

 

[AlteredEgo]

sar·casm noun \ˈsär-ˌka-zəm\
Definition of SARCASM

1
: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2
a : a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual
b : the use or language of sarcasm

Sarcasm, you see because I am a size queen

Sorry. My meter must need re-calibrating.

 

[Daisy]

Sorry. My meter must need re-calibrating.

LOL..thats OK

 

[Drifterwood]

There are some aspects of this which bother me (but they are not germane to the thread).

Similarly, I doubt your average size-queen (that's an odd turn of phrase, huh?) would have a big dick as his or her only selecting factor, even though it is a deal-breaker.

It is relevant. It is what I refer to as a do not pass go criteria.

I am not trying to tell people not to have these, however irrational they may be, I am just giving my personal opinion that basing a decision on a criteria is difficult because those criteria can change and then what are you left with?

Specifically regarding size needs of x by y to really be sexually satisfied, I accept that completely for some women, but being on the receiving end, I would just wonder whether the relationship was going to be as fulfilling in other areas that perhaps are more important to me than to her, in my case. Mostly though, I come back to changing needs, do you just wander off then when your needs change?

 

[B_subgirrl]

Carts and horses.

My definition of a size queen is someone (male or female) who wants you because you have a large cock, supplemented maybe by other things that they may like about you.

You and PB are talking about someone who likes many things about you including your cock. The cock isn't the priority or even a necessity though you may have limits.

It is an important distinction, isn't it? How would you feel for example if someone was primarily attracted to you because of your money? Afterall money problems are apparently the biggest cause of break ups in LTRs Marriages.

I really don't see a major problem if the big cock is a necessity for her, although my answer is most certainly conditional. If she's with you for your cock size BUT NOTHING ELSE then it's all wrong and I wouldn't be with her either if I were a guy (maybe just for a fuck).


If she was with you for many reasons, and your cock size just happened to be one of them, I just don't see where the problem lies. Okay, it may signal that she's a shallow bitch, or that she'll leave you for some guy with a bigger cock. But it might just mean that she's deeper than usual and that sex is important to her. Or it might be that she's inexplicitly aroused by large cocks and that she needs them to get off, but DOESN'T mean she's gonna run off with a bigger one. I just think there's so many reasons why women (and men) are size queens, and while all could come under your definition, it doesn't necessarily mean there's anything negative associated with it (except for small guys).

For the sake of disclosure (although I'm sure you've read this in my posts before), and to use myself as an example, I call myself a part time size queen. I have a 7" minimum for monogamous LTRs, although not for casual or FB sex. I am not particularly aroused by large penises psychologically, but I do need 7" to physically hit my deep spots. Sex with a big cock is better than sex with a small or average cock if all other sexual factors are equal. I don't want to give up deep spot orgasms forever, and good sex is important to me, so it's a NECESSITY that I have a cock that can hit my deep spots if it's the only cock I'm getting. I feel bad about discriminating against smaller guys, but it's the way my body is built. I am not going to run off and leave (general) you because some other guy has a bigger dick. If you've got 7", it's enough. If you haven't, we wouldn't have gotten as far as a LTR anyway, or it would have been done on the condition that the relationship is open.

For LTRs I also require that a guy has a personality I think is fantastic, and that he can be a good Dom. Would I run off and leave you because I found a guy with a better personality or who is a better Dom for me? It's entirely possible.

In short form:

Does he have a good personality? If no, it's a no. If yes, I may fuck him.

After fucking:
If even halfway decent, he may become a FB regardless of other criteria. If not, I don't fuck him again, no matter how big his cock was or how good a Dom he is.

Was his cock bigger than 7"? If yes, he may become a LTR if he's ALSO a good Dom AND has my other criteria. If no, he remains a FB.

Is he a good Dom? If yes, he may become a LTR, if he ALSO has a cock 7" or bigger AND has my other criteria. If no, he remains a FB.


So really, my part time size queen status has less effect than either my need for a good personality or my need for a Dom (Although it seems to have the same weight as the Dom factor, it actually has less, because my need for size is finite and I won't look for someone else if you have enough. My need for a good Dom is potentially infinite and if I find someone better, I may leave you).

 

[B_subgirrl]

Mostly though, I come back to changing needs, do you just wander off then when your needs change?

I could understand someone being concerned about this. For me, all I can say is that I am 7" deep (although stretchable). I guess this could change as a result of pregnancy. Other than that, it ain't changing, so I ain't leaving based on cock size.

And really, this could apply to just about any relationship or sexual need. What happens when he decides he needs an open relationship but she still wants to be monogamous? What happens if he decides he is just so OVER being with an overweight woman and now he needs a slim one? Etc, etc.

 

[AlteredEgo]

It is relevant. It is what I refer to as a do not pass go criteria.

I am not trying to tell people not to have these, however irrational they may be, I am just giving my personal opinion that basing a decision on a criteria is difficult because those criteria can change and then what are you left with?

Specifically regarding size needs of x by y to really be sexually satisfied, I accept that completely for some women, but being on the receiving end, I would just wonder whether the relationship was going to be as fulfilling in other areas that perhaps are more important to me than to her, in my case. Mostly though, I come back to changing needs, do you just wander off then when your needs change?

I'm not sure the aspects which bother me are really material to this discussion, but I'll share so you can know what I mean. I feel there is a certain level of self-loathing associated with people that adamant about avoiding "their own kind". His children will be Puerto Ricans just as much as they will be blacks, and because of this I will insist that they get immersion in criolla and borinquen culture, and that they be fluent in Spanish so they can communicate effectively with our extended family. Extrapolating that this self-loathing might be inadvertently extended to our children as a result of his utter rejection of his own heritage, had I known the full extent of his feelings on this matter, had I understood that this was a serious requirement, not a preference, we'd have had a very long chat over the matter, and I might have returned his engagement ring. We are married; I will not divorce him over this.

It's not his exclusion that bothers me, but rather my suspicions about the reasons behind this particular exclusion. Similarly, if he'd been adamant that a partner have/make a certain amount of money, that might not bother me, depending on the reason why.

Sure, we humans are constantly changing and growing or decaying. Because of this, needs may change. Perhaps a partner's ability to fulfill those needs might change. Perhaps as our needs change, our partners will bend and stretch to accommodate. And perhaps not. Some relationships are not permanent, merely long-term. For some, that may be best. Does one just wander off? I'd guess sometimes one does. Where's the thrill and challenge of a guaranteed thing?

I love my Puerto Rican supremacist in-laws almost as much as my anti-Rican husband. Hopefully, I always will, and hopefully he'll always love me back.

 

[Drifterwood]

If she was with you for many reasons, and your cock size just happened to be one of them, I just don't see where the problem lies.

There is no problem here. It is one of many and in an LTR the priorities of needs fulfilled by what you have found attracted you change all the time.

TBH I have never been in a situation in which I have dropped my pants and the woman has said "Oh thank God for that, if it was small/average I wouldn't have had sex with you." I have been "stud gripped" a few times before fucking someone, but then I don't have any problem having sex with or dating full-time Size Queens. In fact, I enjoy it immensely.

I have a few DNPG criteria, maybe I should add them to Bbucko's thread.

 

[B_subgirrl]

There is no problem here. It is one of many and in an LTR the priorities of needs fulfilled by what you have found attracted you change all the time.

Oh. We're in agreement then (I think?)? I never quite know what to think when you're around. One second I'll be arguing my point at top speed thinking I'm disagreeing with you, the next you say you agree with me. :tongue:

I have a few DNPG criteria, maybe I should add them to Bbucko's thread.

I look forward to it. I love that thread!

 

[Pitbull]

Would you fuck, date, marry/ltr a size queen?



I did not see anything attached to the original question which indicated that the answers were based only on the fact that she was a size queen and not taking anything else into account.

Isn't that exactly what the question is? and the definition is quite specific.

Sorry.
I don't know any one dimensional people.
She is a size queen.
Just a size queen.
No brain
No heart
Just a vagina
Needing a big cock.

Well given those restrictions
I guess maybe maybe and no.
Since I am more than just a big dick.

However, you don't say in your definition that your size is the ONLY reason she is with you, only that she has a necessity or need for size. The two do not necessarily go hand in hand.

If it was ONLY for that reason? Nope. But if any of those were ONE OF the things they found appealing about me, I don't see where the problem lies. And I think that was the point that Pitbull was trying to make - she is a human with many different interests, desires, etc. Chances are that she likes you because YOU are a human with many different interests, desires, etc. Plus you have a big cock.


Pitbull, apologies for speaking for you. Please correct me if I was wrong on any given point.

Pretty much you hit the nail. :smile:
No apology necessary.

 

[Drifterwood]

I am more than just a big dick.

This is the point PB. You are more than just a big cock, so why would you want an LTR with someone who prioritised that aspect of your physicality above everything, especiallly your character?

If character and physical were equal priorities then I wouldn't personally have a problem, but by my definition and what hardcore size queens have told me, they are not. My opinion (and experience) is simply that that is not the basis of an LTR that I would enter into.

 

[Wrat]

My partner can't get off having sex with a guy that has an average dick. She needs a big dick to have an orgasm during vaginal sex. Does coming to that physiological conclusion make her a size queen? Does it make her shallow or unreliable? Does it make her promiscuous? The answer to all of those is no. So I am life partnered (married) to a woman who needs my big dick in order to have satisfying vaginal sex, and she doesn't mind that I know that she needs my big dick to satisfy her.
I'm cool with that.

 

[SpiceFromIndia]

Fuck yest,, marriage no, ltr, no.

I do not trust size queens. I have been around block and I have seen many. For practical reasons, sky has no limit and someone who loves height he wants to go higher, that I have seen in real life.

One example: I was approached by one of my friend's wife and one time one gal I was with was so much into my cock that she wanted to date me. The problem with later was she also loved to look at big cocks and bulges in the public. You might say it does not mean that she is shallow or she is gonna betray you and I would say I spent time with her I know her better than you. We do not live in an ideal society. Lets be practical.

Size queen a big no for marriage and ltr both

 

[SpiceFromIndia]

My partner can't get off having sex with a guy that has an average dick. She needs a big dick to have an orgasm during vaginal sex. Does coming to that physiological conclusion make her a size queen? Does it make her shallow or unreliable? Does it make her promiscuous? The answer to all of those is no. So I am life partnered (married) to a woman who needs my big dick in order to have satisfying vaginal sex, and she doesn't mind that I know that she needs my big dick to satisfy her.
I'm cool with that.

yeah right sir. I always thought sex is mental and best of luck with:smile: that and we all know you are not the sky and curiosity kills the cat.

 

[AlteredEgo]

Fuck yest,, marriage no, ltr, no.

I do not trust size queens. I have been around block and I have seen many. For practical reasons, sky has no limit and someone who loves height he wants to go higher, that I have seen in real life.

One example: I was approached by one of my friend's wife and one time one gal I was with was so much into my cock that she wanted to date me. The problem with later was she also loved to look at big cocks and bulges in the public. You might say it does not mean that she is shallow or she is gonna betray you and I would say I spent time with her I know her better than you. We do not live in an ideal society. Lets be practical.

Size queen a big no for marriage and ltr both

So... you know that girl you dated better than anyone, but Wrat doesn't know his wife better than you do? Interesting.

 

[Drifterwood]

Does it make her shallow or unreliable? Does it make her promiscuous? The answer to all of those is no.

No one is saying that SQs are shallow, unreliable or promiscuous.

 

[SpiceFromIndia]

So... you know that girl you dated better than anyone, but Wrat doesn't know his wife better than you do? Interesting.

I said I know that girl better than LPSG members:tongue: and did not claim that I knew her better than anyone so it is my opinion:biggrin1:. Wrat must be knowing his wife better thats why he said size is a requirement for his wife. What is interesting there ?

Google is amazing isnt ?

Yes, I had a boyfriend at Grad school who I didn't really care for except that he had a huge cock and balls. I suppose I just used him as a boy toy or sex object, all I know is that I could get enough of his big cock.

We, at some point, had a threesome with a girlfriend of mine and I watched him fuck her until she couldn't stand it anymore. She was screaming, cumming, crying and begging him to stop. I found it very sexy. Funnily enough, after we split up she became his girlfriend for the very same reason I did.

Yeah right some better time is certainly waiting for you with some better(bigger) men.

Yes, I've been with men based on their size. I was spoiled this year by having amazing sex with guys who are well endowed. Now that I've had that...having sex with average sized guys just doesn't do it for me. I do not orgasm from intercourse with average sized guys. It's a waste of time. I have tried a few times...and it's just disappointing. I love big cocks! Say it loud! Say it PROUD!

thats right ..

I prefer a bigger guy because it is what turns me on. I would rather not say the size here. I settled once before and had a ltr with someone average, the entire relationship I craved a larger cock and I do not think it was being true to myself for settling for less than what I like

cool

Well, there is more to sex than purely a cock in a vagina. (The right pressure on a womans clit alone can make her see stars).
BUT, my husband of 8 yrs is quite small and whilst enjoyable, the sex isn't as good as it was with someone larger...

tell him please ..

I was lucky enough to work my way up the size chain- my first boyfriend was small, my 2nd was above average, and every guy I dated after him was larger. I found that I definitely couldn't go back after I got used to a guy's size. I'm pretty much hooked on big ones, lol.

Sure the luck gets betters and better as we move and get luckier ...and who does not wanna be lucky ?

Never go back. Bigger is better. Size matters. Etc, etc.

Thats right .. but we have not seen the best yet ...

I might eat all the chocolate straight away bummer...



Perhaps "More girthy, please..."

exactly its challenging isnt it ?

Getting back on topic...no, I could not go back to average now. I started with a guy who was almost 8 inches, then went directly to a guy that was about 4 inches...condoms fell off of him while he was hard. The next guy was at least 7. I've played around with a few dozen cocks, and I have to say...to me, at least...size matters.

Now, to clarify, I'm a girth girl more than length. I don't really need anything over 7 inches. It's the width I can't get enough of.



At this point in my life, I'm looking for the monster cocks, mainly in girth. I want to see what my upper limit is, but I have a feeling I might not have one. I'm a masochist...I love feeling sore the next day. It reminds me of how I got sore to begin with. Average cocks can't do that, they can't hit my cervix (which I like) and they can't make me feel used. I like all the soft lovey dovey stuff, too, but I think both are equally important.

Exactly quest for upper limit. is there any ?

Small to average disappoints, for me. I've been spoilt, and plan to be further spoilt in the future.

thats right ... you are on a mission ..

 

[BiMaleHungWV]

YES. Husband is a SIZE QUEEN and deep throat it all with no complaints. Now anal is a different story.

 

[B_subgirrl]

Google is amazing isnt ?

We all know that there are plenty of size queens here. We certainly didn't need you to tell us that. And that's all that most of the posts you selected DO illustrate. What most of them do NOT illustrate is that:

For practical reasons, sky has no limit and someone who loves height he wants to go higher,

Even if EVERY SINGLE post you selected HAD illustrated that the 'sky has no limit', it still wouldn't show that ALL or even MOST size queens only want to go bigger.

I think you have some serious self esteem issues. Or maybe you're just a misogynist?

 

[SpiceFromIndia]

We all know that there are plenty of size queens here. We certainly didn't need you to tell us that. And that's all that most of the posts you selected DO illustrate. What most of them do NOT illustrate is that:





Even if EVERY SINGLE post you selected HAD illustrated that the 'sky has no limit', it still wouldn't show that ALL or even MOST size queens only want to go bigger.

I think you have some serious self esteem issues. Or maybe you're just a misogynist?

STOP CALLING NAMES, I can type too and it will be never ending game between us so lets not get into it. ..... so I am not mysogynist a'ght ?...... I dont have self esteem issues and I have spent enough time to have some idea how things work in this world. On an average I dont trust size queens and that is the end of the story and there are some good women in this world who are not size queens, why do I have to be with one on the first place ?