KennF
Legendary Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2010
- Posts
- 2,185
- Media
- 9
- Likes
- 1,964
- Points
- 258
- Location
- Florida (United States)
- Sexuality
- 100% Gay, 0% Straight
- Gender
- Male
I think a lot of you are reading the question and thinking that might want to push the button. You've realized that you value a big dick more than human life and that frightens you. So you want to come up with another reason why you can't push the button. Interestingly enough the reason to not push the button becomes just as selfish as pushing the button.
Now you're twisting the answers to fit a predetermined answer. Again, changing your open discussion into a leading question.
Nowhere in @Mercurygirl 's comment did she reflect, intimate, suggest, imply or associate a fear. She acknowledged consequences and the belief in karma, retribution and the age old adage that you should do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
That philosophy, "The Golden Rule", is part of most of the western cultures. You should not read it as a deflection or avoidance, but rather as a cultural norm.
Now, you asked a simple question "the valuation of a human life in exchange for a big dick", and people have responded that it is seems puerile or presents no ethical dilemma.
If you want to create cognitive dissonance or an ethical dilemma, you are going to have to either reduce the negative or raise the positive... "give someone your smaller dick and you get their larger dick"; "loss $100,000 over your lifetime and you get a larger dick"; "impoverish a random person and you get a larger dick"; "give up 5 years of your life and get a larger dick". All different questions, but since your results are clearly lopsided, you either have to adjust your poll, or revise your premise.