If you like, we could dig up some quills and parchment, and you could practice your Spencerian script.I'm glad to see that there is still support for the antiquated technology known as handwriting.
If you like, we could dig up some quills and parchment, and you could practice your Spencerian script.I'm glad to see that there is still support for the antiquated technology known as handwriting.
If you like, we could dig up some quills and parchment, and you could practice your Spencerian script.
Evidently more than some other things.
Do birds get sore when they soar?
Does a wife tell lies when she lies down with her husband?
Is someone with a tan sun kissed or sun kist?
A reel of real important questions that need answers.
While wearing your tee shirts, I imagine.We decided to have afternoon tea
Missed one:
While wearing your tee shirts, I imagine.
Damn! I never thought of that!
I've always thought of it as T-shirt anyway - I don't know if that's correct or not. TBH, I can't recall ever having to write it out until now so I've never really considered the spelling.....
What is wrong with "a hundred and some years"?
What is wrong with "a hundred and some years"?
To my UK ear, it smacks of affectation and pretension.
What is wrong with "a hundred and some years"?
In a thread about proper grammar usage? How is that possible?To my UK ear, it smacks of affectation and pretension.
In my initial reply to your charge that my choice of expression was "affected and pretentious," I held off condemning your ignorance and, by laying the facts of the matter before you, gave you the chance to redeem yourself. You just failed it.To my UK ear, there are expressions and a style that some people sometimes use that reminds me of a George Washington address. I do not know what people in the US think about that, but as a foreigner, I find it affected and pretentious, ten score and some years later.
Here, here! I cannot bare misappropriated homophones.
Does that mean I'm homophoniphobic?
In my initial reply to your charge that my choice of expression was "affected and pretentious," I held off condemning your ignorance and, by laying the facts of the matter before you, gave you the chance to redeem yourself. You just failed it.
How so? You didn't address my queries, rather you again called Cal's syntax, "affected and pretentious".I was eplying to Max.
What do you think? :wink:Wait were you kidding, or do you not know that it's "Hear! Hear!"?
How so? You didn't address my queries, rather you again called Cal's And what is the meaning of "eplying"? Is that your invented word for "replying electronically"?
I don't understand the connection of that thread to this one, or the relevance.I suppose it reflects the level of my interest is this type of thread now.
Why don't you go and sneer at this guy's thread......http://www.lpsg.org/245642-too-all-the-moms.html